Development and Evaluation of Frequency Sensitivity Models in Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing of Ferritic-Pearlitic Steels
Source abstract
Abstract
The increased test frequency inherent in Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing (UFT) is commonly observed to result in an increased fatigue resistance for ferritic, low-carbon steels. In this investigation, the fatigue response of S275J2 ferritic structural steel is evaluated at both 20 kHz and 50 Hz. At the ultrasonic frequency, an increase in the fatigue limit of 136 MPa and an increase in the finite life region of 150 MPa was observed, alongside a reduction in the slope of the S-N curve. By combining the S275J2 results with additional data from the literature, generalised versions of previously proposed frequency sensitivity models are produced by evaluating the model coefficients as a function of different combinations of the material properties. Additionally, a new frequency sensitivity model was proposed by evaluating the empirical change in the S-N curve coefficients as a function of these material properties. For all of the models, it was found that the best correlation was against the ferrite content divided by the tensile strength. The generalised forms of these models were rearranged to produce correction factors, which allow the conventional frequency fatigue response to be estimated based on the UFT test. The most reliable correction method was found to be using the empirical change in the S-N curve exponent.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK
Funding
Weir Group PLC
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. There is no infinite fatigue life in metallic materials10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00183.x ↗
2. Bathias, C., and Paris, P. (2004). Gigacycle Fatigue in Mechanical Practice, CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/9780203020609 ↗
3. Standardization of an ultrasonic fatigue testing method in Japan10.1111/ffe.13727 ↗
4. Comparison of high- and low-frequency fatigue properties of structural steels S355J0 and S355J210.1111/ffe.13580 ↗
5. Christ, H.-J. (2018). Fatigue of low alloyed carbon steels in the HCF/VHCF-regimes. Fatigue of Materials at Very High Numbers of Loading Cycles: Experimental Techniques, Mechanisms, Modeling and Fatigue Life Assessment, Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-24531-3 ↗
6. Effect of test frequency on fatigue strength of low carbon steel10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01350.x ↗
7. Effect of load frequency on high cycle fatigue strength of bullet train axle steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.020 ↗
8. Gorash, Y., Comlekci, T., Styger, G., Kelly, J., Brownlie, F., and Milne, L. (2023). Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing of Structural Steel S275JR+AR with Insights into Corrosion, Mean Stress and Frequency Effects. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16051799 ↗
9. Comparative Fatigue Analysis of Structural Steels Considering Welding and Surface Effects10.1111/str.70003 ↗
10. Cyclic deformation and fatigue behaviour of α-iron mono-and polycrystals10.1007/BF00053520 ↗
11. Correlation of the high and very high cycle fatigue response of ferrite based steels with strain rate-temperature conditions10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.064 ↗
12. Loading frequency effect on the fatigue endurance of structural carbon steels: Estimation based on dislocation motion theory and experimental verification of the model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107634 ↗
13. Theory of the tensile test10.1016/0001-6160(67)90211-8 ↗
14. Deformation mechanisms and strain rate sensitivity of bimodal and ultrafine-grained copper10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.044 ↗
15. Application of finite-life frequency sensitivity evaluation methods to UFT of ferritic structural steels
16. (2019). Hot Rolled Products of Structural Steels—Part 2: Technical Delivery Conditions for Non-Alloy Structural Steels (Standard No. EN 10025-2).
17. (2022). Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (Standard No. ASTM A370-22).
18. (2022). Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials (Standard No. ASTM E384-22).
19. (2020). Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count (Standard No. ASTM E562-19).
20. (2017). Standard Test Method for Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing of Metallic Materials (Standard No. SWES-1112).
21. Fitzka, M., Schönbauer, B.M., Rhein, R.K., Sanaei, N., Zekriardehani, S., Tekalur, S.A., Carroll, J.W., and Mayer, H. (2021). Usability of Ultrasonic Frequency Testing for Rapid Generation of High and Very High Cycle Fatigue Data. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14092245 ↗
22. (2017). Metallic Materials—Fatigue Testing—Axial Force-Controlled Method (Standard No. ISO-1099).
23. Strain rate behaviour in tension of S355 steel: Base for progressive collapse analysis10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.013 ↗
24. Constitutive model of Q345 steel at different intermediate strain rates10.1007/s13296-016-0122-8 ↗
25. Very high cycle fatigue tests of high strength steels S355 J0 and S355 J2
26. Effect of the loading frequency on fatigue properties of JIS S15C low carbon steel and some discussions based on micro-plasticity behavior10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.005 ↗
27. High-Cycle Fatigue and Thermal Dissipation Investigations for Low Carbon Steel Q34510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.664.305 ↗
28. High/very high cycle fatigue behaviors of medium carbon pearlitic wheel steels and the effects of microstructure and non-metallic inclusions10.1016/j.msea.2019.138208 ↗
29. Failure mechanisms of automotive metallic alloys in very high cycle fatigue range10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.09.019 ↗
30. Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode
31. Size-effect in Very High Cycle Fatigue: A review10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106462 ↗
32. Influence of the Loading Frequency on Very High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Structural Steels10.1111/ffe.14483 ↗