Data-Driven Framework for Dimensional Quality Control in Automotive Assembly: Integration of PCA-BP Neural Network with Traceable Deviation Source Identification
Source abstract
Abstract
The intelligent transformation in the manufacturing industry poses challenges to traditional quality control methods, particularly in handling redundant data and ensuring model interpretability within high-dimensional, multivariate assembly processes. This study presents an integrated approach combining Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Back Propagation neural network (BP neural network), and permutation importance to improve quality prediction and traceability in the automotive body-in-white rear panel dimensional chain. The data for this study originates from the actual production process of an automotive manufacturer. It comprises direct geometric measurements from the rear panel of a specific vehicle model’s Body-in-White (BIW). The measurement points from key coordinates that influence rear panel matching serve as the numerical input variables. The corresponding measurement result from the Skeleton Assembly is utilised as the output variable, which represents the final assembly quality and is treated as a numerical variable in this model. PCA is first applied to reduce dimensionality and eliminate data redundancy. Then, two types of neural networks—single and sequential—are constructed to model nonlinear relationships, with the single neural network exhibiting superior performance in accuracy (average R2 > 95%) and generalisability (RMSE < 0.1). To address the lack of interpretability in conventional neural networks, the permutation importance of variables is assessed to pinpoint the primary sources of bias and to clarify the mechanisms of variable interactions. The automotive company’s practical validation demonstrates the model’s capability to predictively assess the effects of abrupt alterations in bodyside dimensions on rear panel matching quality. The close agreement between predicted (e.g., 1.053693) and actual (e.g., 1.01) values confirms model accuracy, diminishing the reliance on supplementary quality control resources. This study provides a traceable, data-driven framework for enhancing quality control in complex manufacturing assemblies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Shibata, H., Cheldelin, B., and Ishii, K. (2003, January 15–21). Assembly Quality Methodology: A New Method for Evaluating Assembly Complexity in Globally Distributed Manufacturing. Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Washington, DC, USA.
2. Quality Prediction Modelling for Multistage Manufacturing Based on Classification and Association Rule Mining10.1051/matecconf/201712300029 ↗
3. The Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Industry 4.0: A Taxonomy, Approaches, and Future Directions10.1016/j.cie.2023.109662 ↗
4. Structural Damage Prediction under Seismic Sequence Using Neural Networks
5. Regional-scale nonlinear structural seismic response prediction by neural network10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107707 ↗
6. Xiao, N.Y., Wen, K., Qu, Y.J., Mao, Y.X., and Yang, P. (2025). Surface-Roughness Prediction Based on Small-Batch Workpieces for Smart Manufacturing: An Aerospace Robotic Grinding Case Study. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15031349 ↗
7. Jiao, A., Zhang, G., Liu, B., and Liu, W. (2020). Prediction of Manufacturing Quality of Holes Based on a BP Neural Network. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10062108 ↗
8. Quality Assurance Model in Mechanical Assembly10.1007/s00170-010-2679-2 ↗
9. A Methodology for Data-Driven Adjustment of Variation Propagation Models in Multistage Manufacturing Processes10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.02.005 ↗
10. A New Assembly Precision Prediction Method of Aeroengine High-Pressure Rotor System Considering Manufacturing Error and Deformation of Parts10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.08.010 ↗
11. A General Mathematic Model Framework for Assembly Process Driven Digital Twin of Assembly Precision10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.09.007 ↗
12. An Interactive Clothing Design and Personalized Virtual Display System10.1007/s11042-018-5912-x ↗
13. Zheng, Y., Huang, X., Wang, M., and Hu, P. (2023). Source and Accumulation Analysis of Deviation during Multi-Level Assembly of an Aircraft Rear Fuselage Frame. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13179914 ↗
14. Genetic Algorithm Optimization Based on Manufacturing Prediction for an Efficient Tolerance Allocation Approach10.1007/s10845-023-02132-1 ↗
15. Concurrent Optimization of Parameter and Tolerance Design Based on the Two-Stage Bayesian Sampling Method10.1080/16843703.2023.2165290 ↗
16. A Study on Machining Error Prediction Model of Precision Vertical Grinding Machine Based on the Tolerance of Key Components10.1007/s00170-024-13278-4 ↗
17. A Data-Driven Methodology to Improve Tolerance Allocation Using Product Usage Data10.1115/1.4050400 ↗
18. A Systematic Quality-Integrated Diagnostic Method for Complex Product Assembly Using Multi-Task Spatial–Temporal Transfer Learning10.1007/s00170-024-14433-7 ↗
19. Manufacturing Quality Assessment in the Industry 4.0 Era: A Review10.1080/14783363.2023.2194524 ↗
20. Overview of PSO for Optimizing Process Parameters of Machining10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.064 ↗
21. Quarto, M., D’Urso, G., Giardini, C., Maccarini, G., and Carminati, M. (2021). A Comparison between Finite Element Model (FEM) Simulation and an Integrated Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Approach to Forecast Performances of Micro Electro Discharge Machining (Micro-EDM) Drilling. Micromachines, 12.10.3390/mi12060667 ↗
22. A Research on the Prediction of Machining Accuracy by the Deterministic Grey Dynamic Model DGDM (1,1,1)
23. Vibration-Based Tool Condition Monitoring in Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Using an Optimization Model of GM(1,N) and SVM10.1007/s00170-021-07280-3 ↗
24. A Particle Swarm-Optimized Support Vector Machine for Reliability Prediction10.1002/qre.1221 ↗
25. Prediction of Surface Quality in End Milling Based on Modified Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network10.2478/amns.2021.2.00213 ↗
26. Quality Prediction of Continuous Casting Slabs Based on Weighted Extreme Learning Machine10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3192541 ↗
27. Using Machine Learning Prediction Models for Quality Control: A Case Study from the Automotive Industry10.1007/s10287-023-00448-0 ↗
28. Quality-Integrated Diagnostic Platform for Aerospace Complex Product Assembly Processes10.1016/j.cie.2023.109796 ↗
29. Xi, Y., Gao, Z., Chen, K., Dai, H., and Liu, Z. (2022). Error Propagation Model Using Jacobian-Torsor Model Weighting for Assembly Quality Analysis on Complex Product. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10193534 ↗
30. Hybrid Mechanism and Data-Driven Digital Twin Model for Assembly Quality Traceability and Optimization of Complex Products10.1016/j.aei.2024.102707 ↗
31. A Digital Twin-Based Method for Assembly Deviations Analysis10.1115/1.4065882 ↗
32. An Intelligent Control Model Based on Digital Twin Technology and Optimized Least-Squares Support Vector Regression for Predicting Electromagnetic Brake Assembly Quality10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3331734 ↗
33. Quality Monitoring in Multistage Manufacturing Systems by Using Machine Learning Techniques10.1007/s10845-021-01792-1 ↗
34. Layer-Wise Residual-Guided Feature Learning with Deep Learning Networks for Industrial Quality Prediction10.1109/TIM.2022.3214611 ↗
35. Improving audit opinion prediction accuracy using metaheuristics-tuned XGBoost algorithm with interpretable results through SHAP value analysis10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110955 ↗
36. Prediction of Deviation Range of Gear Autonomous Machining Relying on Failure Sign Algorithm of Firefly Neural Network
37. Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Improve Process Quality: Evidence from Semiconductor Manufacturing10.1287/mnsc.2021.4190 ↗
38. Multi-Layer Parallel Transformer Model for Detecting Product Quality Issues and Locating Anomalies Based on Multiple Time-series Process Data in Industry 4.010.1016/j.jmsy.2023.08.013 ↗
39. Wang, X.C., Cui, J.R., and Xu, M.M. (2024). A Chlorophyll-a Concentration Inversion Model Based on Backpropagation Neural Network Optimized by an Improved Metaheuristic Algorithm. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16091503 ↗
40. Performances of regression model and artificial neural network in monitoring welding quality based on power signal10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.050 ↗
41. Qu, D., Liang, W., Zhang, Y., Gu, C., and Zhan, Y. (2024). Research on Machining Quality Prediction Method Based on Machining Error Transfer Network and Grey Neural Network. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 8.10.3390/jmmp8050203 ↗
42. A Multiphase Dual Attention-Based LSTM Neural Network for Industrial Product Quality Prediction10.1109/TII.2024.3383054 ↗
43. Wang, S., She, J., Kawata, S., Wang, F., Zhao, J., and Chen, Q. (2024, January 18–21). Improved BP neural network utilizing Bayesian optimization algorithm for iron-making process control. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ISIE54533.2024.10595790 ↗
44. Zou, L., Zhang, J., Han, Y., Zeng, F., Li, Q., and Liu, Q. (2021). Internal Crack Prediction of Continuous Casting Billet Based on Principal Component Analysis and Deep Neural Network. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11121976 ↗
45. Wang, W.L., Shi, H.X., Cheng, X.H., Ding, R.D., Sun, J.W., Yuan, L., Wang, X.J., Hao, S.Z., Jing, Y., and Han, Q.G. (2025). A Machine Learning-Optimized Robot-Assisted Driving System for Efficient Flexible Forming of Composite Curved Components. Eng, 6.10.3390/eng6120356 ↗
46. Selecting inputs for modeling using normalized higher order statistics and independent component analysis10.1109/72.925564 ↗
47. Civil aviation safety evaluation based on deep belief network and principal component analysis10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.012 ↗
48. Wang, F.Y., Xu, H.Y., Ye, H.F., Yan, L., and Wang, Y.B. (2025). Predicting Earthquake Casualties and Emergency Supplies Needs Based on PCA-BO-SVM. Systems, 13.10.3390/systems13010024 ↗
49. Backpropagation neural network prediction model of arc additive manufacturing weld size based on particle swarm optimization algorithm10.3901/JME.2012.21.097 ↗
50. Predicting the durability and strength of fiber-reinforced concrete exposed to salt and freezing conditions