Identifying Biodiversity-Based Indicators for Regulating Ecosystem Services in Constructed Wetlands
Source abstract
Abstract
Constructed wetlands (CWs) are nature-based solutions that integrate ecological processes for water purification, climate regulation, and biodiversity enhancement. However, biodiversity monitoring in CWs has often been underprioritized, limiting its recognition as a functional driver of ecosystem service performance. This study first developed the Biodiversity-based Ecosystem Service Index (BBESI), a hierarchical framework for evaluating biodiversity contributions to regulating services, and then systematically identified representative indicators from the literature to operationalize this framework. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 39 studies spanning tropical, temperate, and arid climatic regions were reviewed across six ecosystem functions: pollutant removal, nutrient retention, biological uptake, carbon storage, greenhouse gas regulation, and microclimate control. Indicators were considered representative when they demonstrated clear functional relevance to CW ecosystem processes and were repeatedly supported across the reviewed studies. These included microbial diversity metrics, nutrient-cycling functional genes, plant–microbe functional complementarity, and vegetation structural attributes. Each indicator was mapped to the Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBV) framework, spanning Genetic Composition, Species Traits, Community Composition, Ecosystem Structure, and Ecosystem Function to provide a standardized basis for biodiversity assessment, using a rule-based assignment that prioritized the biological signal of each indicator rather than its functional category. Although all EBV classes were represented, this pattern reflects the available literature and is influenced by uneven reporting across microbial and plant indicators and across climatic regions, which limits broad generalization of indicator strength. The BBESI offers a transferable framework because its EBV-aligned structure and commonly measured indicators allow application across diverse CW designs and environmental contexts provided that multiple EBV co-signals are present rather than reliance on single-indicator measurements, with flexibility for future integration of various quantitative weighting approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment · Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology · Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 1223-24, Chungnamdo, Republic of Korea
References (95)
Show source-provided references
1. Mancuso, G., Bencresciuto, G.F., Lavrnić, S., and Toscano, A. (2021). Diffuse water pollution from agriculture: A review of nature-based solutions for nitrogen removal and recovery. Water, 13.10.3390/w13141893 ↗
2. Nature-based Solutions to tackle climate change and restore biodiversity10.1111/1365-2664.14059 ↗
3. Knowledge gaps and future research needs for assessing the non-market benefits of Nature-Based Solutions and Nature-Based Solution-like strategies10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156636 ↗
4. Spieles, D.J. (2022). Wetland Construction, Restoration, and Integration: A Comparative Review. Land, 11.10.3390/land11040554 ↗
5. The Use of Constructed Wetlands in Sequestrating Carbon: An Overview
6. Gorgoglione, A., and Torretta, V. (2018). Sustainable management and successful application of constructed wetlands: A critical review. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10113910 ↗
7. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Five decades of experience10.1021/es101403q ↗
8. Biswal, B.K., and Balasubramanian, R. (2022). Constructed Wetlands for Reclamation and Reuse of Wastewater and Urban Stormwater: A Review. Front. Environ. Sci., 10.10.3389/fenvs.2022.836289 ↗
9. To What Extent Can Constructed Wetlands Enhance Biodiversity?10.18178/ijesd.2017.8.8.1016 ↗
10. Ecological, recreational and educational potential of a small artificial wetland in an urban environment10.2989/16085914.2019.1663721 ↗
11. Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011 ↗
12. Waly, M.M., Mickovski, S.B., Thomson, C., and Amadi, K. (2022). Impact of Implementing Constructed Wetlands on Supporting the Sustainable Development Goals. Land, 11.10.3390/land11111963 ↗
13. Masoud, A.M.N., Alfarra, A., and Sorlini, S. (2022). Constructed Wetlands as a Solution for Sustainable Sanitation: A Comprehensive Review on Integrating Climate Change Resilience and Circular Economy. Water, 14.10.3390/w14203232 ↗
14. Stefanakis, A.I. (2019). The Role of Constructed Wetlands as Green Infrastructure for Sustainable Urban Water Management. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11246981 ↗
15. Wetlands as large-scale nature-based solutions: Status and challenges for research, engineering and management10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.012 ↗
16. Cooke, S.J., Harrison, I., Thieme, M.L., Landsman, S.J., Birnie-Gauvin, K., Raghavan, R., Creed, I.F., Pritchard, G., Ricciardi, A., and Hanna, D.E.L. (2023). Is it a new day for freshwater biodiversity? Reflections on outcomes of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. PLoS Sustain. Transform., 2.10.1371/journal.pstr.0000065 ↗
17. Pereira, L., and Bina, O. (2020). The IPBES Conceptual Framework: Enhancing the Space for Plurality of Knowledge Systems and Paradigms. Non-Human Nature in World Politics, Spinger.10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_15 ↗
18. Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between mother earth and ecosystem services10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009 ↗
19. Assessing nature’s contributions to people10.1126/science.aap8826 ↗
20. Wetlands as nature-based solutions for water management in different environments10.1016/j.coesh.2023.100476 ↗
21. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2019). The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policy Makers, IPBES Secretariat. Available online: www.ipbes.net.
22. Uy, M.J., Robles, M.E., Oh, Y., Haque, M.T., Mueca, C.C., and Kim, L.H. (2025). Biodiversity Monitoring in Constructed Wetlands: A Systematic Review of Assessment Methods and Ecosystem Functions. Diversity, 17.10.3390/d17050367 ↗
23. Biodiversity monitoring, ecological integrity, and the design of the New Zealand Biodiversity Assessment Framework10.20417/nzjecol.44.17 ↗
24. Essential biodiversity variables10.1126/science.1229931 ↗
25. An operational definition of essential biodiversity variables10.1007/s10531-017-1386-9 ↗
26. Test study of the optimal design for hydraulic performance and treatment performance of free water surface flow constructed wetland10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.163 ↗
27. Constructed wetlands in Flanders: A performance analysis10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.08.001 ↗
28. Rahman, M.E., Bin Halmi, M.I.E., Bin Abd Samad, M.Y., Uddin, M.K., Mahmud, K., Abd Shukor, M.Y., Sheikh Abdullah, S.R., and Shamsuzzaman, S.M. (2020). Design, operation and optimization of constructed wetland for removal of pollutant. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17228339 ↗
29. Kadlec, R.H., and Wallace, S. (2008). Treatment Wetlands, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420012514 ↗
30. A constructed treatment wetland as an opportunity to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.042 ↗
31. Role of Redox Reactions and AI-Driven Approaches in Enhancing Nutrient Availability for Plants10.62486/latia202586 ↗
32. Removal of organic carbon, nitrogen, emerging contaminants and fluorescing organic matter in different constructed wetland configurations10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.122 ↗
33. Reddy, K.R., DeLaune, R.D., and Inglett, P.W. (2022). Biogeochemistry of Wetlands, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429155833 ↗
34. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009 ↗
35. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process
36. The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 ↗
37. Chapter Six—Multi-criteria analysis10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.07.001 ↗
38. Wetlands In a Changing Climate: Science, Policy and Management10.1007/s13157-018-1023-8 ↗
39. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
40. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 ↗
41. Building essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale10.1111/brv.12359 ↗
42. Toward the development of microbial indicators for wetland assessment10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.023 ↗
43. What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.09.009 ↗
44. A review on the removal of heavy metals and metalloids by constructed wetlands: Bibliometric, removal pathways, and key factors10.1007/s11274-021-03123-1 ↗
45. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010 ↗
46. Ecosystem services by paddy fields as substitutes of natural wetlands in Japan10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.026 ↗
47. A suite of essential biodiversity variables for detecting critical biodiversity change10.1111/brv.12332 ↗
48. Bridging the gap between biodiversity data and policy reporting needs: An Essential Biodiversity Variables perspective10.1111/1365-2664.12417 ↗
49. Global biodiversity monitoring: From data sources to Essential Biodiversity Variables10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.014 ↗
50. How to increase microbial degradation in constructed wetlands: Influencing factors and improvement measures10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.095 ↗
51. Microbial community structure in a constructed wetland based on a recirculating aquaculture system: Exploring spatio-temporal variations and assembly mechanisms10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106413 ↗
52. Wang, J., Long, Y., Yu, G., Wang, G., Zhou, Z., Li, P., Zhang, Y., Yang, K., and Wang, S. (2022). A Review on Microorganisms in Constructed Wetlands for Typical Pollutant Removal: Species, Function, and Diversity. Front. Microbiol., 13.10.3389/fmicb.2022.845725 ↗
53. Microbiological dimensions and functions in constructed wetlands: A review
54. Seth, N., Vats, S., Lakhanpaul, S., Arafat, Y., Mazumdar-Leighton, S., Bansal, M., and Babu, C.R. (2024). Microbial community diversity of an integrated constructed wetland used for treatment of sewage. Front. Microbiol., 15.10.3389/fmicb.2024.1355718 ↗
55. Qualitative variability in microbial community of constructed wetlands used for purifying wastewater contaminated with pharmaceutical substances10.18388/abp.2015_1165 ↗
56. CW-MFC for efficient degradation of ofloxacin-containing wastewater and dynamic analysis of microbial communities10.1016/j.isci.2025.112516 ↗
57. Wang, X., Xue, M., Wang, Z., Xia, W., and Zhang, C. (2024). Integrated Constructed Wetland–Microbial Fuel Cell Systems Using Activated Carbon: Structure-Activity Relationship of Activated Carbon, Removal Performance of Organics and Nitrogen. Water, 16.10.3390/w16020278 ↗
58. Responses of bacterial community structure and denitrifying bacteria in biofilm to submerged macrophytes and nitrate10.1038/srep36178 ↗
59. Roy, S.G., Wimpee, C.F., McGuire, S.A., and Ehlinger, T.J. (2022). Responses of Bacterial Taxonomical Diversity Indicators to Pollutant Loadings in Experimental Wetland Microcosms. Water, 14.10.3390/w14020251 ↗
60. Enhancing total nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands: A Comparative study of iron ore and biochar amendments10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121873 ↗
61. Purification effect and microorganisms diversity in an Acorus calamus constructed wetland on petroleum-containing wastewater10.1080/26395940.2019.1711200 ↗
62. Greywater treatment using lab-scale systems combining trickling filters and constructed wetlands with recycled foam glass and water spinach10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101915 ↗
63. Wang, L., Pang, Q., Peng, F., Zhang, A., Zhou, Y., Lian, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., Zhu, Y., and Ding, C. (2020). Response Characteristics of Nitrifying Bacteria and Archaea Community Involved in Nitrogen Removal and Bioelectricity Generation in Integrated Tidal Flow Constructed Wetland-Microbial Fuel Cell. Front. Microbiol., 11.10.3389/fmicb.2020.01385 ↗
64. Deciphering diversity indices for a better understanding of microbial communities10.4014/jmb.1709.09027 ↗
65. Measuring biological diversity10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.049 ↗
66. Estimation of river ecosystem biodiversity based on the Chao estimator10.1007/s10531-017-1429-2 ↗
67. Structural and metabolic responses of microbial community to sewage-borne chlorpyrifos in constructed wetlands10.1016/j.jes.2015.07.020 ↗
68. Carbon Storage and Sequestration in Constructed Wetlands: A Systematic Review
69. Assessing organic matter and organic carbon contents in soils of created mitigation Wetlands in Virginia10.4491/eer.2013.18.3.151 ↗
70. The below-ground biomass contributes more to wetland soil carbon pools than the above-ground biomass—A survey based on global wetlands10.1093/jpe/rtae017 ↗
71. Surface water sanitation and biomass production in a large constructed wetland in the Netherlands10.1007/s11273-010-9179-x ↗
72. Plant species diversity impacts nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide emissions as much as carbon addition in constructed wetland microcosms10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.030 ↗
73. Yang, R., Li, K., Fang, J., Quan, Q., Zhang, C., and Liu, J. (2020). The Invasion of Alternanthera philoxeroides Increased Soil Organic Carbon in a River and a Constructed Wetland With Different Mechanisms. Front. Ecol. Evol., 8.10.3389/fevo.2020.574528 ↗
74. Ecohydrology and ecosystem services of a natural and an artificial bofedal wetland in the central Andes10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155968 ↗
75. Evaluation of changes in the microbial community structure in the sediments of a constructed wetland over the years10.1007/s00203-022-03157-5 ↗
76. Microbial Community Changes across Time and Space in a Constructed Wetland10.1021/acsenvironau.4c00021 ↗
77. Oberholzer, M.M., Oberholster, P.J., Ndlela, L.L., Botha, A.M., and Truter, J.C. (2022). Assessing Alternative Supporting Organic Materials for the Enhancement of Water Reuse in Subsurface Constructed Wetlands Receiving Acid Mine Drainage. Recycling, 7.10.3390/recycling7030041 ↗
78. Long-term monitoring of constructed wetlands in distilleries in Scotland—Evaluating treatment performance and seasonal microbial dynamics10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124279 ↗
79. Differences in Denitrifying Community Structure of the Nitrous Oxide Reductase (Nosz I) Type Gene in a Multi-Stage Surface Constructed Wetland10.15666/aeer/2002_15511569 ↗
80. Liu, X., Zhang, H., Yao, M., Li, L., and Qin, Y. (2023). Assessment of Carbon Reduction Benefits of A/O-Gradient Constructed Wetland Renovation for Rural Wastewater Treatment in the Southeast Coastal Areas of China Based on Life Cycle Assessment: The Example of Xiamen Sanxiushan Village. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15108094 ↗
81. Effects of plant species diversity and density of Acorus calamus and Reineckea carnea on nitrogen removal and plant growth in constructed wetlands during the cold season10.4491/eer.2022.297 ↗
82. Plant species traits regulate methane production in freshwater wetland soils10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.009 ↗
83. Compositions of sequestrated soil carbon in constructed wetlands of Taiwan10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150290 ↗
84. Drivers of Vegetation Development, Biomass Production and the Initiation of Peat Formation in a Newly Constructed Wetland10.1007/s10021-019-00454-x ↗
85. Anaerobic respiration pathways and response to increased substrate availability of Arctic wetland soils10.1039/D0EM00124D ↗
86. Sulfate availability affect sulfate reduction pathways and methane consumption in freshwater wetland sediments10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106215 ↗
87. Effects of three years of soil warming and shading on the rate of soil respiration: Substrate availability and not thermal acclimation mediates observed response10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01373.x ↗
88. Micro-climate influence on reference evapotranspiration estimates in wetlands
89. Microclimate in forests with varying leaf area index and soil moisture: Potential implications for seedling establishment in a changing climate10.1111/1365-2745.12121 ↗
90. Niu, X., Chen, B., Sun, W., Feng, T., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Liu, W., and Fu, B. (2024). Estimation of Coastal Wetland Vegetation Aboveground Biomass by Integrating UAV and Satellite Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16152760 ↗
91. An improved NDVI-based method to predict actual evapotranspiration of irrigated grasses and crops10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106077 ↗
92. How Essential Biodiversity Variables and remote sensing can help national biodiversity monitoring
93. Lock, M., van Duren, I., Skidmore, A.K., and Saintilan, N. (2022). Harmonizing Forest Conservation Policies with Essential Biodiversity Variables Incorporating Remote Sensing and Environmental DNA Technologies. Forests, 13.10.3390/f13030445 ↗
94. National-Scale Terrestrial Biodiversity and Ecosystem Monitoring with Essential Biodiversity Variables in Japan and Finland10.1111/1440-1703.70011 ↗
95. Moersberger, H., Martin, J.G.C., Junker, J., Georgieva, I., Bauer, S., Beja, P., Breeze, T., Brotons, L., Bruelheide, H., and Fernández, N. (2022). Europa Biodiversity Observation Network: User and Policy Needs Assessment. ARPHA Prepr.10.3897/arphapreprints.e84517 ↗