A GIS-Based Multicriteria Approach to Identifying Suitable Forest Depot Sites: A Case Study from Northern Türkiye
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural disasters, particularly floods and landslides, can cause severe losses; however, their impacts can be significantly mitigated through proactive planning. In August 2021, a devastating flood in northern Türkiye resulted in major damage, including the displacement of logs from the Ayancık Forest Management Directorate’s depot, which exacerbated the disaster’s effects. This study aims to identify the most suitable location for a new forest depot in Ayancık, considering disaster risk, logistical needs, and environmental factors. A hybrid geospatial approach was employed by integrating Logistic Regression (LR)-based landslide susceptibility modeling and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Key conditioning factors such as altitude, slope, aspect, lithology, land cover, plan and profile curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), distance to drainage networks, roads, and faults were used to produce the LSM. The AHP weights of the factors used in selecting a suitable depot location were determined based on expert opinions. The integration of physical, logistical, and risk-based parameters allowed for a spatial prioritization of suitable areas. Results indicate that approximately 10.69% of the study area is classified as class 1 (very high suitability), 16.59% as class 2 (high), 20.71% as class 3 (moderate), 23.34% as class 4 (low), and 28.67% as class 5 (very low), corresponding to 27.28% of the area in classes 1–2 and 52.01% in classes 4–5. These results indicate that the study area is predominantly characterized by medium-low suitability conditions. Notably, these areas show significantly lower flood and landslide susceptibility compared to the current depot sites. By aligning forest infrastructure planning with disaster resilience principles, this study offers a replicable model for sustainable forest depot site selection. The findings provide valuable guidance for forest managers and policymakers to enhance the safety, functionality, and long-term viability of forestry operations in hazard-prone regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soil and Land Suitability Analysis · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Fire effects on ecosystems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Forest Engineering, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37150, Türkiye
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Smart Management of Emergencies in the Agricultural, Forestry, and Animal Production Domain: Tackling Evolving Risks in the Climate Change Era10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105015 ↗
2. Towards a Sustainable World through Human Factors and Ergonomics: It Is All about Values10.1080/00140139.2014.945495 ↗
3. Sustainable Forestry and Environmental Impacts: Assessing the Economic, Environmental, and Social Benefits of Adopting Sustainable Agricultural Practices10.1016/j.ecofro.2024.05.009 ↗
4. Sustainability in Wood Products: A New Perspective for Handling Natural Diversity10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00360 ↗
5. Climate Change and Soil Resilience: A Critical Appraisal on Innovative Techniques for Sustainable Ground Improvement and Ecosystem Protection10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1465 ↗
6. Teku, D., and Derbib, T. (2025). Uncovering the Drivers, Impacts, and Urgent Solutions to Soil Erosion in the Ethiopian Highlands: A Global Perspective on Local Challenges. Front. Environ. Sci., 12.10.3389/fenvs.2024.1521611 ↗
7. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Al-Khawabi River Basin, Tartous, Syria: An Integrated Approach of Bivariate-Statistical Modelling and Geospatial Technology10.1016/j.envc.2025.101327 ↗
8. Orman Varlığı ve Orman Yangınlarının Etkisi
9. Perspectives and Attitudes of Forest Products Industry Companies on the Chain of Custody Certification: A Case Study from Turkey10.3390/su6020857 ↗
10. Yıldırım, H.T. (2019). Raw Material Demand–Supply and Policy Recommendations of Turkish Wood-Based Panel Industry. Timber Buildings and Sustainability, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.82627 ↗
11. GDF (2024). İşletme Pazarlama Şube Müdürlüğü Kayıtları [Business Marketing Branch Directorate Records], GDF. (In Turkish).
12. Orman İşletme Depolarında İş Kazalarının Önlenmesi: Teknik ve Yönetsel Çözümler [Prevention of Occupational Accidents in Forest Management Warehouses: Technical and Managerial Solutions]10.33439/ergonomi.1174518 ↗
13. Restoration of Urban Forests to Reduce Flood Susceptibility: A Starting Point10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102944 ↗
14. Agnoletti, M. (2025). The Timber Forests in the Eastern Alps. History of the Italian Forest Landscape, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-81631-4 ↗
15. Orman İşletme Depoları ve Depolama Teknikleri [Forest Management Warehouses and Storage Techniques]
16. Şahin, C., and Sipahioğlu, Ş. (2003). Doğal Afetler ve Türkiye [Natural Disasters and Türkiye], Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık. (In Turkish).
17. Özşahin, E. (2013, January 25–27). Türkiye’de Yaşanmış (1970–2012) Doğal Afetler Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme [An Evaluation of Natural Disasters Experienced in Türkiye (1970–2012)]. Proceedings of the 2. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, Hatay, Turkey.
18. Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study from the Tinau Watershed, West Nepal10.1016/j.cageo.2012.11.003 ↗
19. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Support Vector Machines, and Logistic Regression10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7 ↗
20. Comparison of Frequency Ratio Model and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods upon Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Geospatial Techniques
21. Height Above the Nearest Drainage–a hydrologically relevant new terrain model10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.051 ↗
22. Comparison of Information Value and Logistic Regression Models in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Using GIS10.1007/s12665-016-5317-y ↗
23. A multi-criteria approach for assessing the sustainability of small-scale cooking and sanitation technologies
24. A decision-making model for prioritizing low-carbon policies in climate change mitigation
25. The Use of Adaptive Artificial Intelligence (AI) Learning Models in Decision Support Systems for Smart Regions
26. Comparing Classical Statistical and Machine Learning Models in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey10.1007/s11069-021-04743-4 ↗
27. Application of Alternating Decision Tree with AdaBoost and Bagging Ensembles for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping10.1016/j.catena.2019.104396 ↗
28. Comparing Probabilistic and Statistical Methods in Landslide Susceptibility Modeling in Rwanda/Centre-Eastern Africa10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.248 ↗
29. Production of Landslide Susceptibility Map Using Bayesian Probability Model
30. A Novel Hybrid Approach for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Integrating Analytical Hierarchy Process and Normalized Frequency Ratio Methods with the Cloud Model10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.024 ↗
31. Assessment of the Effects of Training Data Selection on the Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)10.1080/19475705.2017.1407368 ↗
32. A Comparison of Landslide Susceptibility Maps Produced by Logistic Regression, Multi-Criteria Decision, and Likelihood Ratio Methods: A Case Study at İzmir, Turkey10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7 ↗
33. Assessing LNRF, FR, and AHP Models in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Index: A Comparative Study of Nojian Watershed in Lorestan Province, Iran10.1007/s12665-018-7524-1 ↗
34. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons. [3rd ed.].10.1002/9781118548387 ↗
35. Kleinbaum, D.G., and Klein, M. (2010). Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text, Springer. [3rd ed.].10.1007/978-1-4419-1742-3 ↗
36. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package10.18637/jss.v028.i05 ↗
37. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804 ↗
38. GIS-Based Solar Farms Site Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Karapinar Region, Konya/Turkey10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.042 ↗
39. Landfill Site Selection Using Spatial Information Technologies and AHP: A Case Study in Beijing, China10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.008 ↗
40. Analytic Hierarchy Process for Hospital Site Selection10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.02.005 ↗
41. Jozaghi, A., Alizadeh, B., Hatami, M., Flood, I., Khorrami, M., Khodaei, N., and Ghasemi Tousi, E. (2018). A Comparative Study of the AHP and TOPSIS Techniques for Dam Site Selection Using GIS: A Case Study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran. Geosciences, 8.10.20944/preprints201810.0773.v1 ↗
42. Application of an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the GIS Interface for Suitable Fire Site Selection: A Case Study from Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal10.1016/j.seps.2015.10.001 ↗
43. AHP with GIS for a Preliminary Site Selection of Wind Turbines in the North West of Jordan10.4236/ijg.2016.710090 ↗
44. Railway Station Site Selection Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Data Envelopment Analysis10.1016/j.cie.2010.03.006 ↗
45. Li, Z., Xue, Y., Qiu, D., Xu, Z., Zhang, X., Zhou, B., and Wang, X. (2017). AHP–Ideal Point Model for Large Underground Petroleum Storage Site Selection: An Engineering Application. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9122343 ↗
46. Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 ↗
47. Comparison of Diverse Machine Learning Algorithms for Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping in Antalya, Türkiye10.1016/j.asr.2024.04.018 ↗
48. Satellite-derived Digital Elevation Model (DEM) selection, preparation and correction for hydrodynamic modelling in large, low-gradient and data-sparse catchments10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.049 ↗
49. GeoFlood: Large-scale flood inundation mapping based on high-resolution terrain analysis10.1029/2018WR023457 ↗
50. A comparison of simplified conceptual models for rapid web-based flood inundation mapping10.1007/s11069-018-3331-y ↗
51. Modelling flood-prone area and vulnerability using integration of multi-criteria analysis and HAND model in the Ogun River Basin, Nigeria10.1080/02626667.2020.1764960 ↗
52. Landslide Preparation by Forestry Activity in a Region of High Erosion Rates: Waingake Landslide, Northeast New Zealand10.1080/00288306.2025.2464024 ↗
53. The Effects of Forests on Landslides10.18182/tjf.31067 ↗
54. Assessment of Forest Road Conditions in Terms of Landslide Susceptibility: A Case Study in Yığılca Forest Directorate (Turkey)10.3906/tar-1303-12 ↗
55. Risk Analysis of Forest Roads Using Landslide Susceptibility Maps and Generation of the Optimum Forest Road Route: A Case Study in Macka, Turkey10.1080/10106049.2019.1659424 ↗
56. Analyzing Landslide Susceptibility of Forest Roads by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a Forest Planning Unit of Turkiye10.1007/s11069-024-06882-w ↗
57. Chen, C., Shen, Z., Weng, Y., You, S., Lin, J., Li, S., and Wang, K. (2023). Modeling Landslide Susceptibility in Forest-Covered Areas in Lin’an, China, Using Logistic Regression, a Decision Tree, and Random Forests. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15184378 ↗
58. Asada, H., and Minagawa, T. (2023). Impact of Vegetation Differences on Shallow Landslides: A Case Study in Aso, Japan. Water, 15.10.3390/w15183193 ↗
59. Modeling of Landslide Susceptibility in a Part of Abay Basin, Northwestern Ethiopia10.1515/geo-2020-0206 ↗
60. Integrating Multicriteria Decision-Making Analysis for a GIS-Based Settlement Area in the District of Atakum, Samsun, Turkey10.1007/s00704-020-03439-2 ↗
61. Mondal, B.K., Mahata, S., Basu, T., Das, R., Patra, R., Abdelrahman, K., Fnais, M.S., and Praharaj, S. (2024). Analysis of the Post-Cyclonic Physical Flood Susceptibility and Changes of Mangrove Forest Area Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Process and Geospatial Analysis in Indian Sundarbans. Atmosphere, 15.10.3390/atmos15040432 ↗
62. A GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning and Alternative Forest Road Routes Assessment in Protection Forests10.31298/sl.146.3-4.4 ↗
63. GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using AHP, FMEA, and Pareto Systematic Analysis in Central Yalova, Türkiye
64. Integrating Geospatial Technologies and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Sustainable and Resilient Urban Planning
65. Technological Innovation in Digital Brand Management: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Immersive Experiences10.57017/jorit.v4.2(8).06 ↗
66. Strategies towards Evaluation beyond Scientific Impact. Pathways Not Only for Agricultural Research10.12924/of2015.01010003 ↗