Coordinated Allocation of Channel-Tugboat-Berth Resources Under Tidal Constraints at Liquid Terminal
Source abstract
Abstract
Driven by the surging global demand for crude oil and its byproducts, liquid tanker vessels have undergone a marked shift toward ultra-large dimensions. This growth, while enhancing transport capacity, has also intensified congestion across many liquid terminals. As the Dead Weight Tonnage (DWT) of vessels rises, so does their draft, often requiring tide-dependent navigation for safe entry into ports. To address the resulting operational complexities, this study investigates the coordinated scheduling of three critical resources—channels, tugboats, and berths—at liquid terminals. A novel optimization framework, termed the Channel-Tugboat-Berth-Tide (CUBT) model, is proposed. The primary objective is to minimize the total operational cost over a planning horizon, accounting for anchorage waiting time, channel occupancy, tugboat utilization, and penalties from delayed departures. To solve this model efficiently, we adopt an enhanced variant of the Logistic-Hybrid-Adaptive Black Widow Optimization Algorithm (LHA-BWOA), incorporating Logistic-Sine-Cosine Chaotic Map (LSC-CM) initialization, hybrid reproduction mechanisms, and dynamic parameter adaptation. A series of case studies involving varying planning cycles are conducted to validate the model’s practical viability. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses are performed to evaluate the impact of channel choice, tugboat allocation, and vessel waiting time. Results indicate that tugboat operations account for the largest portion of the total costs. Notably, while two-way channels result in lower direct channel costs, they do not always yield the lowest overall expenditure. Among the service strategies evaluated, the First-In–First-Out (FIFO) rule is found to be the most cost-efficient. The results offer practical guidance for port improving the operational efficiency of liquid terminals under complex tidal and resource constraints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Ports and Logistics · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Maritime Navigation and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 437000, China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Particle swarm optimization algorithm for the berth allocation problem10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.051 ↗
2. A collaborative agreement for berth allocation under excessive demand10.1016/j.engappai.2017.11.009 ↗
3. Priority control of berth allocation problem in container terminals10.1007/s10479-015-1912-7 ↗
4. Vessel transportation scheduling optimization based on channel–berth coordination10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.011 ↗
5. A two-stage robust optimization approach for the berth allocation problem under uncertainty10.1007/s10696-019-09343-w ↗
6. A set-partitioning-based model for the berth allocation problem under time-dependent limitations10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.021 ↗
7. The waterway ship scheduling problem10.1016/j.trd.2016.09.013 ↗
8. The berth allocation optimisation with the consideration of time varying water depths10.1080/00207543.2018.1449975 ↗
9. Evaluating the solution performance of IP and CP for berth allocation with time-varying water depth10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.007 ↗
10. Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control10.1016/j.trb.2017.10.008 ↗
11. Managing navigation channel traffic and anchorage area utilization of a container port10.1287/trsc.2018.0879 ↗
12. Chu, L., Zhang, J., Chen, X., and Yu, Q. (2024). Optimization of integrated tugboat–berth–quay crane scheduling in container ports considering uncertainty in vessel arrival times and berthing preferences. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12091541 ↗
13. A probabilistic model for accidental cargo oil outflow from product tankers in a ship–ship collision10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.026 ↗
14. Operational thresholds of moored ships at the oil terminal of inner port of A Coruña (Spain)10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.031 ↗
15. Port management and multiple-criteria decision making under uncertainty10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.007 ↗
16. Black Widow Optimization Algorithm: A novel meta-heuristic approach for solving engineering optimization problems10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103249 ↗
17. A multistrategy fusion–improved black widow optimization algorithm for structural damage identification10.1155/stc/2939779 ↗
18. An improved black widow optimization algorithm for engineering constrained optimization problems10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3262600 ↗
19. Wan, C., He, B., Fan, Y., Tan, W., Qin, T., and Yang, J. (2022). Improved black widow spider optimization algorithm integrating multiple strategies. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24111640 ↗
20. An improved black widow optimization (IBWO) algorithm for solving global optimization problems
21. An enhanced black widow optimization algorithm for feature selection10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107638 ↗
22. Lei, W., Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., Lin, Y., Hou, J., and Sun, Y. (2022, January 25). An improved jaya optimization algorithm with hybrid logistic-sine-cosine chaotic map. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI), Wuhan, China.10.1109/ICACI55529.2022.9837758 ↗
23. Enhanced differential evolution with hierarchical selection mutation and distance-based selection strategy10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110124 ↗
24. An adaptive differential evolution algorithm based on adaptive evolution strategy and diversity enhancement10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106551 ↗