Safety-Constrained Disturbance-Compensated Model Predictive Control for Flexible-Joint Robots
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible-joint robots (FJRs) offer safety and energy efficiency in collaborative tasks, yet achieving high-precision tracking remains challenging under strict state and safety constraints due to elastic coupling, model mismatch, and external disturbances. To address this issue, this paper proposes a safe and disturbance-compensated model predictive control (SDC-MPC) method that integrates model predictive control (MPC) with a disturbance observer (DOB) to estimate and compensate lumped uncertainties and disturbances in real time. To enforce safety, a control barrier function (CBF) is incorporated as an online inequality to maintain forward-invariance safety constraints. The method adapts safety margins to disturbances and allows soft relaxations of constraints when necessary, thereby ensuring feasibility under strong disturbances. A discrete-time implementation makes the approach suitable for real-time applications. Experiments on a single-joint platform demonstrate improved tracking performance and robustness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems · Iterative Learning Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics of CAS, Xi’an 710119, China
School of Optoelectronics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Key Laboratory of Space Precision Measurement Technology of CAS, Xi’an 710119, China
Funding
the National Science and Technology Major Project
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. A Unified Passivity-Based Control Framework for Position, Torque and Impedance Control of Flexible Joint Robots10.1177/0278364907073776 ↗
2. On the Passivity-Based Impedance Control of Flexible Joint Robots10.1109/TRO.2008.915438 ↗
3. Speed Gain in Elastic Joint Robots: An Energy Conversion-Based Approach10.1109/LRA.2021.3068698 ↗
4. Stable Flexible-Joint Floating-Base Robot Balancing and Locomotion via Variable Impedance Control10.1109/TIE.2022.3169848 ↗
5. Model-Free Robust Adaptive Control of Humanoid Robots With Flexible Joints10.1109/TIE.2016.2588461 ↗
6. Input-output robust tracking control design for flexible joint robots10.1109/9.362898 ↗
7. Adaptive sliding control for single-link flexible-joint robot with mismatched uncertainties10.1109/TCST.2004.826968 ↗
8. Design of Robust Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Underactuated Flexible Joint Robot10.1109/TSMC.2021.3096835 ↗
9. Adaptive Control of Flexible Joint Manipulators: Comments on Two Papers10.1016/0005-1098(95)98487-Q ↗
10. Predefined-Time Composite Fuzzy Adaptive Control for Flexible-Joint Manipulator System With High-Order Fully Actuated Control Approach10.1109/TIE.2024.3515255 ↗
11. Command-Filtered Backstepping Control for Flexible Joint Manipulator Systems with Full-State Constraints10.1007/s12555-020-0810-1 ↗
12. Doina, Z.M. (2012, January 25–27). LQG/LQR optimal control for flexible joint manipulator. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering, Iasi, Romania.10.1109/ICEPE.2012.6463601 ↗
13. Linear offset-free Model Predictive Control10.1016/j.automatica.2009.06.005 ↗
14. Hasan, M.N., Haris, M., Pirzada, S.J.H., and Qin, S. (2019, January 13–14). Adaptive Model Predictive Control for a Class of Nonlinear Single-Link Flexible Joint Manipulator. Proceedings of the 2019 Second International Conference on Latest Trends in Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (INTELLECT), Karachi, Pakistan.10.1109/INTELLECT47034.2019.8955464 ↗
15. A novel MPC-NNSMC composite control method for robotic manipulators considering uncertainties and constraints10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106238 ↗
16. Nonlinear Adaptive Model Predictive Controller for a Flexible Manipulator: An Experimental Study10.1109/TCST.2013.2294545 ↗
17. Constrained Model Predictive Control: Stability and Optimality10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00214-9 ↗
18. Disturbance-Observer-Based PD Control of Flexible Joint Robots for Asymptotic Convergence10.1109/TRO.2015.2477957 ↗
19. Disturbance-observer-based tracking controller for a flexible-joint robotic manipulator with full-state constraints
20. Workspace Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for Robust Position Control of Flexible Joint Robots10.1109/LRA.2024.3375292 ↗
21. Design of a Prediction-Accuracy-Enhanced Continuous-Time MPC for Disturbed Systems via a Disturbance Observer10.1109/TIE.2015.2450736 ↗
22. Non-linear-disturbance-observer-enhanced MPC for motion control systems with multiple disturbances10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5821 ↗
23. Ames, A.D., Coogan, S., Egerstedt, M., Notomista, G., Sreenath, K., and Tabuada, P. (2019, January 25–28). Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applications. Proceedings of the 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC), Naples, Italy.10.23919/ECC.2019.8796030 ↗
24. Kurtz, V., Wensing, P.M., and Lin, H. (2021, January 14–17). Control Barrier Functions for Singularity Avoidance in Passivity-Based Manipulator Control. Proceedings of the 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9683597 ↗
25. Control barrier function based visual servoing for Mobile Manipulator Systems under functional limitations10.1016/j.robot.2024.104813 ↗
26. Flexible Active Safety Motion Control for Robotic Obstacle Avoidance: A CBF-Guided MPC Approach10.1109/LRA.2025.3534519 ↗
27. An Experimental Study on MPC-Based Joint Torque Control for Flexible Joint Robots
28. Chen, W.H., Yang, J., Guo, L., and Li, S. (2014, January 24–29). A general nonlinear MPC framework for disturbances rejection. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress the International Federation of Automatic Control, Cape Town, South Africa.
29. Zeng, J., Zhang, B., and Sreenath, K. (2021, January 25–28). Safety-Critical Model Predictive Control with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functions. Proceedings of the 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9483029 ↗
30. Singletary, A., and Ames, A.D. (October, January 27). Comparative Analysis of Control Barrier Functions and Artificial Potential Fields for Obstacle Avoidance. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic.10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636670 ↗