Credit Evaluation Through Integration of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning: Empirical Improvement and Unsupervised Component Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
In the financial sector, machine learning has become essential for credit risk assessment, often outperforming traditional statistical approaches, such as linear regression, discriminant analysis, or model-based expert judgment. Although machine learning technologies are increasingly being used, further research is needed to understand how they can be effectively combined and how different models interact during credit evaluation. This study proposes a technique that integrates hierarchical clustering, namely Agglomerative clustering and Balanced Iterative Reducing and Clustering using Hierarchies, along with individual supervised models and a self organizing map-based consensus model. This approach helps to better understand how different clustering algorithms influence model performance. To support this approach, we performed a detailed unsupervised component analysis using metrics such as the silhouette score and Adjusted Rand Index to assess cluster quality and its relationship with the classification results. The study was applied to multiple datasets, including a Taiwanese credit dataset. It was also extended to a multiclass classification scenario to evaluate its generalization ability. The results show that the quality metrics of the cluster correlate with the performance, highlighting the importance of combining unsupervised clustering and self organizing map consensus methods for improving credit evaluation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction · Credit Risk and Financial Regulations · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Science and Technology (GSST), Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning methods application for consumer banking
2. Machine learning powered financial credit scoring: A systematic literature review10.1007/s10462-025-11416-2 ↗
3. Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Credit Card Fraud Detection Using SMOTE and AdaBoost10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3134330 ↗
4. Chang, V., Sivakulasingam, S., Wang, H., Wong, S.T., Ganatra, M.A., and Luo, J. (2024). Credit Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Study on Credit Card Customers. Risks, 12.10.3390/risks12110174 ↗
5. Noriega, J.P., Rivera, L.A., and Herrera, J.A. (2023). Machine Learning for Credit Risk Prediction: A Systematic Literature Review. Data, 8.10.20944/preprints202308.0947.v1 ↗
6. Statistical and machine learning models in credit scoring: A systematic literature survey10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106263 ↗
7. An explainable AI decision-support-system to automate loan underwriting10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113100 ↗
8. Statistical Classification Methods in Consumer Credit Scoring: A Review10.1111/j.1467-985X.1997.00078.x ↗
9. A comparative study on base classifiers in ensemble methods for credit scoring10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.020 ↗
10. Integration of unsupervised and supervised machine learning algorithms for credit risk assessment10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.033 ↗
11. Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-Organizing Maps, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2 ↗
12. A Survey of Recent Advances in Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms10.1093/comjnl/26.4.354 ↗
13. BIRCH: A New Data Clustering Algorithm and Its Applications10.1023/A:1009783824328 ↗
14. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 ↗
15. Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions10.1080/01969727408546059 ↗
16. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
17. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R.E. (1996, January 3–6). Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, USA.
18. Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy10.1023/A:1022859003006 ↗
19. Muniappan, M., and Paruvachi Subramanian, N.D. (2025). A Majority Voting Mechanism-Based Ensemble Learning Approach for Financial Distress Prediction in Indian Automobile Industry. J. Risk Financ. Manag., 18.10.3390/jrfm18040197 ↗
20. The self-organizing map10.1109/5.58325 ↗
21. Smoothed self-organizing map for robust clustering10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.038 ↗
22. Drobics, M., Winiwater, W., and Bodenhofer, U. (2000, January 13–15). Interpretation of self-organizing maps with fuzzy rules. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Internationals Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
23. Ryzhikov, I., Huovinen, M., and Hiltunen, Y. (2022, January 21–23). Increasing interpretability and prediction rate by combining self-organizing maps with modeling algorithms. Proceedings of the First SIMS EUROSIM Conference on Modelling and Simulation, SIMS EUROSIM 2021, and 62nd International Conference of Scandinavian Simulation Society, SIMS 2021, Virtual Conference, Oulu, Finland.10.3384/ecp2118592 ↗
24. Hybrid mining approach in the design of credit scoring models10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.022 ↗
25. Assessment of Probability Defaults Using K-Means Based Multinomial Logistic Regression10.7763/IJCTE.2022.V14.1314 ↗
26. Yu, T., Huang, W., Tang, X., and Zheng, D. (2025). A hybrid unsupervised machine learning model with spectral clustering and semi-supervised support vector machine for credit risk assessment. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0316557 ↗
27. Deep reinforcement learning based on balanced stratified prioritized experience replay for customer credit scoring in peer-to-peer lending10.1007/s10462-023-10697-9 ↗
28. Construction of Credit Risk Assessment System Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning and Machine Learning–Taking P2p Lending Platform as An Example10.1051/itmconf/20257801017 ↗
29. Sutton, R.S., and Barto, A.G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press.10.1109/TNN.1998.712192 ↗
30. ReG-Rules: An Explainable Rule-Based Ensemble Learner for Classification10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062763 ↗
31. Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd wave10.1007/s10462-023-10448-w ↗
32. Chapter 1. Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretation
33. Neuromorphic engineering—A paradigm shift for future IM technologies10.1109/MIM.2019.8674627 ↗
34. Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications10.1038/s43588-021-00184-y ↗
35. Creditworthiness Criteria According to the 5Cs Model and Credit Decision: The Moderating Role of Intellectual Capital
36. Evaluation Strategies of Credit Risk used by Commercial Banks Listed in Palestine Stock Exchange (PSE)
37. On Clustering Validation Techniques10.1023/A:1012801612483 ↗
38. (2020, June 19). South German Credit. Available online: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/573/south+german+credit+update.
39. (2020, June 19). Statlog (Australian Credit Approval). Available online: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/143/statlog+australian+credit+approval.
40. (2016, January 25). Default of Credit Card Clients. Available online: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/350/default+of+credit+card+customers.
41. Muntasir, F., Anower, M.S., and Nahiduzzaman, M. (2023, January 23–25). Majority Voting Ensemble Approach for Predicting Diabetes Mellitus in Female Patients from Unbalanced Dataset. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE), Chittagong, Bangladesh.10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101629 ↗
42. Dietterich, T.G. (2000). Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning. International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, Springer.10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 ↗
43. Wiewer, A. (2024, November 25). Credit_Score_Classification. Available online: https://www.openml.org/search?type=data&status=any&id=46441.