journal article·2025-12-10Open access

Mechanical Characterisation of Carbonised Plant Scaffolds as Potential Bone Graft Substitutes

Kamil Joszko, Grzegorz Dulęba, Ilona Łysy, Justyna Majewska, Bożena Gzik-Zroska, Wojciech Wolański, Saeid Ghavami, Arkadiusz Szarek, Marek Łos

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 24

Abstract

This article presents an assessment of the mechanical properties of biochars in the context of their potential application as bone graft substitutes. The samples were obtained from selected hardwood species and subjected to pyrolysis at temperatures of 400 °C, 600 °C, 800 °C and 1000 °C. To assess the mechanical properties, a classical three-point bending test was employed alongside Digital Image Correlation (DIC), which enabled analysis of displacement and strain distribution. The results indicate that biochars derived from hornbeam pyrolysed (carbonised) at 800 °C achieve Young’s modulus values of up to 5.69 ± 0.76 GPa and those, carbonised at 1000 °C, reached flexural (bend) strength values of up to 0.01897 ± 0.00211 GPa. These parameters fall within the range of cancellous bone properties and the lower range of cortical bone properties of the mandible, suggesting their potential suitability for reconstructing load-bearing bone structures with limited mechanical demand, including the mandible. The results highlight the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the material and indicate the need for further studies on biocompatibility and surface functionalisation. Plant-derived biochars, owing to their natural porosity and properties comparable to bone tissue, may represent a promising alternative to currently used biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: activated carbon and charcoal · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomechatronics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

Department of Medical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

Department of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

Manitoba Center for Proteomics and Systems Biology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P4, Canada

Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6, Canada

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland

Biotechnology Centre, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Funding

National Science Center · Silesian University of Technology

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. (2017). Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on Medical Devices, Amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. OJ L, 117, 1–175. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj/eng.
2. Programmable Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101296 ↗
3. Ethier, C.R., and Simmons, C.A. (2007). Introductory Biomechanics: From Cells to Organisms, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Texts in Biomedical Engineering.10.1017/CBO9780511809217 ↗
4. Bioinspired Structural Materials10.1038/nmat4089 ↗
5. Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121139 ↗
6. Biological Basis of Bone Strength: Anatomy, Physiology and Measurement
7. Lieberman, J.R., and Friedlaender, G.E. (2005). Bone Regeneration and Repair: Biology and Clinical Applications, Humana Press.10.1385/1592598633 ↗
8. Bone Strength and Its Determinants10.1007/s00198-002-1345-4 ↗
9. Regenerating Bone with Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: A Review of in Vivo Studies in Bone Defect Models10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030 ↗
10. Biomechanical and Molecular Regulation of Bone Remodeling10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095721 ↗
11. Mechanical Properties and the Hierarchical Structure of Bone10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-1 ↗
12. Reis, R.L., and Weiner, S. (2003, January 13–24). Learning from Nature How to Design New Implantable Biomaterialsis: From Biomineralization Fundamentals to Biomimetic Materials and Processing Routes. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Alvor, Algarve, Portugal. NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry.
13. Herman, I.P. (2016). Mechanical Properties of the Body. Physics of the Human Body, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-23932-3_4 ↗
14. Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the Art and Future Trends10.1002/mabi.200400026 ↗
15. Autograft versus Allograft for Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review10.1055/s-0036-1580610 ↗
16. Bone Graft Prefabrication Following the In Vivo Bioreactor Principle10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.09.016 ↗
17. Bioactive and Biodegradable Nanocomposites and Hybrid Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration10.3390/jfb3020432 ↗
18. A Review on the Recent Applications of Synthetic Biopolymers in 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications10.1007/s10856-023-06765-9 ↗
19. Bone Graft Substitutes10.1007/s00256-007-0377-4 ↗
20. Wood Elasticity and Compressible Wood-Based Materials: Functional Design and Applications10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101354 ↗
21. Evolutions, Revolutions and Trends in Biomaterials Science—A Perspective10.1002/adem.200700284 ↗
22. Breish, F., Hamm, C., and Andresen, S. (2024). Nature’s Load-Bearing Design Principles and Their Application in Engineering: A Review. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9090545 ↗
23. Bioresorbability, Porosity and Mechanical Strength of Bone Substitutes: What Is Optimal for Bone Regeneration?10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008 ↗
24. Porosity of 3D Biomaterial Scaffolds and Osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
25. Experimental Assessment of Biomechanical Properties in Human Male Elbow Bone Subjected to Bending and Compression Loads
26. The Role of Matrix Composition in the Mechanical Behavior of Bone10.1007/s11914-018-0433-0 ↗
27. Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing Technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-Based Biomaterials for Bone Substitution10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.037 ↗
28. Nefjodovs, V., Andze, L., Andzs, M., Filipova, I., Tupciauskas, R., Vecbiskena, L., and Kapickis, M. (2023). Wood as Possible Renewable Material for Bone Implants—Literature Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14050266 ↗
29. Glenske, K., Donkiewicz, P., Köwitsch, A., Milosevic-Oljaca, N., Rider, P., Rofall, S., Franke, J., Jung, O., Smeets, R., and Schnettler, R. (2018). Applications of Metals for Bone Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.20944/preprints201802.0051.v1 ↗
30. Shmulsky, R., and Jones, P.D. (2019). Forest Products and Wood Science: Hardwood Structure, Wiley. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781119426400 ↗
31. Shmulsky, R., and Jones, P.D. (2019). Forest Products and Wood Science: Softwood Structure, Wiley. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781119426400 ↗
32. Ansell, M.P. (2015). Wood Microstructure–A Cellular Composite. Wood Composites, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-1-78242-454-3.10000-9 ↗
33. Chen, H., Bahmani, M., Humar, M., and Cheng, D. (2020). Properties of Wood Ceramics Prepared from Thermo-Modified Poplar. Forests, 11.10.3390/f11111204 ↗
34. Carbonization of Wood for Advanced Materials Applications10.1016/S0008-6223(96)00136-4 ↗
35. Preparation of Biomorphic SiC Ceramic by Carbothermal Reduction of Oak Wood Charcoal10.1016/j.msea.2003.11.051 ↗
36. Biomorphic Ceramics from Wood-Derived Precursors10.1080/09506608.2017.1354429 ↗
37. Design, Structure and Properties of Organomorphic Composites as New Materials10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.310 ↗
38. Comprehensive Investigation on Fast Pyrolysis of Waste Lotus Shells to Produce Valuable Products: Pyrolysis Characteristics, Reaction Mechanism and Economic Analysis10.1016/j.jece.2023.111172 ↗
39. Basu, P. (2010). Pyrolysis and Torrefaction. Biomass Gasification Design Handbook, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-374988-8.00003-9 ↗
40. Properties of Biochar10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054 ↗
41. Wood-Inspired Highly Anisotropic Scaffold Activated with in Situ Mineralized Collagen for Advanced Bone Regeneration10.1016/j.cej.2024.153297 ↗
42. Comparative Characterization of Biogenic and Chemical Synthesized Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Potential Biomedical Application10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.02.021 ↗
43. Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.007 ↗
44. Young’s Modulus, Bending Strength, and Tissue Physical Properties of Human Compact Bone10.1002/jor.1100080416 ↗
45. Factors Affecting the Determination of the Physical Properties of Femoral Cortical Bone10.3109/17453676608989401 ↗
46. Jiang, C.-P., Wibisono, A.T., and Pasang, T. (2021). Selective Laser Melting of Stainless Steel 316L with Face-Centered-Cubic-Based Lattice Structures to Produce Rib Implants. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14205962 ↗
47. The Mechanical Properties of Human Ribs in Young Adult
48. Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in the Human Mandible: Implications for Dental Implant Treatment Planning and Surgical Placement10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90437-8 ↗