A Physiologically Explainable Classifier for Labour Prediction Based on Electrohysterographical Signals
Source abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Managing women in pregnancy or labour is becoming a serious challenge because of delayed conception age and higher morbidity. The main negative factor is increasing numbers of overweight and obese women. Fatty tissue significantly biases the detection of uterine contractions by tocography, which is routinely used in obstetrical wards. Thus, the FDA approved an alternative method called electrohysterography (EHG) and recommended it for women with an over-normal BMI. However, almost all published methods of labour prediction based on EHG signals use a “black-box model” approach, i.e., increasingly numerically complex signal features and classification algorithms that are chosen a priori, without any physiological rationale behind them. This makes using these algorithms difficult in obstetrical practice. AIM. The aim of the study was to show that a simple classifier based on a single and physiologically interpretable parameter can predict uterine contractions during labour with an accuracy comparable to advanced classifiers. METHODS. An obstetrical interpretable EHG parameter was introduced called the uterine activity index. To avoid the influence of confounding factors associated with preterm labour and imbalanced signal sets, this classifier was evaluated using the private, retrospective database of EHG signals registered for 45 women in the third trimester of a pregnancy, and 31 women in the second stage of labour with a normal BMI. The classifier, based on the logistic regression model, was tested using the bootstrap method. RESULTS. The bootstrapping mean (95% confidence interval) of the AUC ROC estimated for the 200 bootstrap samples was 0.96 (0.91–0.99). This accuracy was slightly better for EHG signals in comparison to predictions based on classical tocography. CONCLUSIONS. The obtained results confirm that a simple physiologically explained classifier can be considered in commercial applications of electrohysterography. However, its clinical significance should be evaluated through properly designed randomised clinical trials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis · Neonatal and fetal brain pathology · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Radioelectronics and Multimedia Techniques, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland
RadDarMed, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
Independent Researcher, 02-001 Warsaw, Poland
Innovation Centre for Digital Medicine, National Information Processing Institute, 00-608 Warsaw, Poland
Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
Department of Health Science, Academy of Applied Sciences Mazovia, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Taniguchi, K., Watari, T., and Nagoshi, K. (2023). Characteristics and trends of medical malpractice claims in Japan between 2006 and 2021. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0296155 ↗
2. Klemann, D., Rijkx, M., Mertens, H., van Merode, F., and Klein, D. (2023). Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Healthcare, 11.10.3390/healthcare11111636 ↗
3. Risk management and provider liabilities in infantile cerebral palsy based on malpractice litigation cases10.1016/j.jflm.2018.11.010 ↗
4. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Cognitive bias and medical error in obstetrics-challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.033 ↗
5. Short-term and Long-Term Effects of Caesarean Section on the Health of Women and Children10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5 ↗
6. Electrohysterography in the diagnosis of preterm birth: A review10.1088/1361-6579/aaad56 ↗
7. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215 ↗
8. A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups10.1007/s11517-008-0350-y ↗
9. The Icelandic 16-electrode electrohysterogram database10.1038/sdata.2015.17 ↗
10. Diab, A., Boudaoud, S., Karlsson, B., and Marque, C. (2021). Performance comparison of coupling-evaluation methods in discriminating between pregnancy and labour EHG signals. Comput. Biol. Med., 132.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104308 ↗
11. An open dataset with electrohysterogram records of pregnancies ending in induced and cesarean section delivery10.1038/s41597-023-02581-6 ↗
12. Critical analysis of electrohysterographic methods for continuous monitoring of intrauterine pressure10.3934/mbe.2020171 ↗
13. Prats-Boluda, G., Pastor-Tronch, J., Garcia-Casado, J., Monfort-Ortíz, R., Perales Marín, A., Diago, V., Roca Prats, A., and Ye-Lin, Y. (2021). Optimization of Imminent Labour Prediction Systems in Women with Threatened Preterm Labour Based on Electrohysterography. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21072496 ↗
14. Comparison of different EHG feature selection methods for the detection of preterm labour10.1155/2013/485684 ↗
15. A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.10.005 ↗
16. Interactions between Uterine EMG at Different Sites Investigated Using Wavelet Analysis: Comparison of Pregnancy and Labour Contractions10.1155/2010/918012 ↗
17. Zhang, Y., Hao, D., Yang, L., Zhou, X., Ye-Lin, Y., and Yang, Y. (2022). Assessment of Features between Multichannel Electrohysterogram for Differentiation of Labours. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093352 ↗
18. Identification of Contractions from Electrohysterography for Prediction of Prolonged Labour10.2478/joeb-2022-0002 ↗
19. Noninvasive electromyometrial imaging of human uterine maturation during term labour10.1038/s41467-023-36440-0 ↗
20. Application of decision tree in determining the importance of surface electrohysterography signal characteristics for recognizing uterine contractions10.1016/j.bbe.2019.06.008 ↗
21. Novel Multichannel Entropy Features and Machine Learning for Early Assessment of Pregnancy Progression Using Electrohysterography10.1109/TBME.2022.3176668 ↗
22. Fergus, P., Cheung, P., Hussain, A., Al-Jumeily, D., Dobbins, C., and Iram, S. (2013). Prediction of preterm deliveries from EHG signals using machine learning. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0077154 ↗
23. New electrohysterogram-based estimators of intrauterine pressure signal, tonus and contraction peak for non-invasive labour monitoring10.1088/1361-6579/ab37db ↗
24. Daskalakis, G., Psarris, A., Koutras, A., Fasoulakis, Z., Prokopakis, I., Varthaliti, A., Karasmani, C., Ntounis, T., Domali, E., and Theodora, M. (2023). Maternal Infection and Preterm Birth: From Molecular Basis to Clinical Implications. Children, 10.10.3390/children10050907 ↗
25. Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach10.1088/0967-3334/26/5/014 ↗
26. Computational physiology of uterine smooth muscle10.1177/0036850419850431 ↗
27. Young, R.C., and Barendse, P. (2014). Linking myometrial physiology to intrauterine pressure; how tissue-level contractions create uterine contractions of labour. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003850 ↗
28. Dedicated entropy measures for early assessment of pregnancy progression from single-channel electrohysterography10.1109/TBME.2017.2723933 ↗
29. Computerized analysis of normal fetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation10.1002/uog.6365 ↗
30. An Integrated Review of Uterine Activity Monitoring for Evaluating Labour Dystocia10.1111/jmwh.13119 ↗
31. Nieto-del-Amor, F., Prats-Boluda, G., Martinez-De-Juan, J.L., Diaz-Martinez, A., Monfort-Ortiz, R., Diago-Almela, V.J., and Ye-Lin, Y. (2021). Optimized Feature Subset Selection Using Genetic Algorithm for Preterm Labour Prediction Based on Elec trohysterography. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21103350 ↗
32. Zhou, X.X., Obuchowski, N.A., and McClish, D.K. (2002). Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine, Willey.10.1002/9780470317082 ↗
33. Non-obstetrical indications for cesarean section: A state-of-the-art review10.1007/s00404-018-4742-4 ↗
34. White, N., Parsons, R., Collins, G., and Barnett, A. (2023). Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models. BMC Med., 21.10.1186/s12916-023-03048-6 ↗
35. Overly optimistic prediction results on imbalanced data: A case study of flaws and benefits when applying over-sampling10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101987 ↗
36. Interpretable, not black-box, artificial intelligence should be used for embryo selection10.1093/hropen/hoab040 ↗
37. How are decisions made in cancer care? A qualitative study using participant observation of current practice10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016360 ↗
38. Towards an Explainable AI-Based Tool to Predict Preterm Birth
39. Markus, A.F., Kors, J.A., and Rijnbeek, P.R. (2021). The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: A comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies. J. Biomed. Inform., 113.10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655 ↗
40. Pirnar, Ž., Jager, F., and Geršak, K. (2024). Peak amplitude of the normalized power spectrum of the electromyogram of the uterus in the low frequency band is an effective predictor of premature birth. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0308797 ↗
41. Qualitative assessment of interpretability and observer agreement of three uterine monitoring techniques10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.008 ↗
42. Simultaneous Recording and Analysis of Uterine and Abdominal Muscle Electromyographic Activity in Nulliparous Women During Labour10.1177/1933719116658704 ↗
43. Method for Simultaneous Monitoring of Uterine Contractions and Abdominal Pushing in a Childbirth