Rock Mass Strength Characterisation from Field and Laboratory: A Comparative Study on Carbonate Rocks from the Larzac Plateau
Source abstract
Abstract
The southern edge of the Larzac carbonate plateau in Occitanie (France) is subject to various landslide processes from rock falls, toppling, and roto-translational slides to rock spreading. To constrain the strength of the carbonate rock mass involved, field and laboratory approaches have been employed. The first approach involves field investigations using the Rock Mass Rating method and the Geological Strength Index, as well as estimations of uniaxial compressive strength conducted with the Schmidt hammer. The second approach consists of various laboratory tests under uniaxial compressive and triaxial stress. A comparison of mechanical parameters obtained from the field and laboratory approaches for characterising the rock mass (cohesion, friction angle and Young’s modulus) illustrates that laboratory measurements provide much higher (70%) cohesion values than field measurements. The friction angles derived from the field investigations are also weaker (20%). Such differences are considered the result of a scale effect, which is less evident for the Young’s modulus. The field approach appears to be more representative of the in situ rock mass strength as it characterises the rock mass by considering both the intact rock and discontinuities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut des Sciences de la Terre de Paris (ISTeP), Sorbonne Université, CNRS-INSU, 75005 Paris, France
GéoCod, Cerema Méditerranée, 13593 Aix-en-Provence, France
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. Wyllie, D.C., and Norrish, N.I. (1996). Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation. Chapter 14—Rock Strength Properties and Their Measurement. Transportation Research Board Special Report, Transportation Research Board.
2. Estimating the Deformation Modulus of Rock Masses: A Comparative Study10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00112-0 ↗
3. A Critical Review of Rock Slope Failure Mechanisms: The Importance of Structural Geology10.1016/j.jsg.2015.02.002 ↗
4. Developments in the Characterization of Complex Rock Slope Deformation and Failure Using Numerical Modelling Techniques10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.033 ↗
5. The Role of Tectonic Damage and Brittle Rock Fracture in the Development of Large Rock Slope Failures10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.010 ↗
6. Bi, R., Xu, C., Xuan, Z., Zhou, J., and Du, K. (2025). Joint Characterization and Stability Analysis: Measurement Techniques and Engineering Implications. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.10.1007/s00603-025-04885-y ↗
7. Presidential Address: Rock Engineering—Good Design or Good Judgement?
8. He, J. (1993). A Case Review of the Deformation Modulus of Rock Mass: Scale Effect. Scale Effects in Rock Masses 93, CRC Press.
9. Engineering Classification of Jointed Rock Masses
10. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1976). Rock Mass Classification in Rock Engineering, Symposium Proceedings of Exploration for Rock Engineering, A. A. Balkema.
11. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1993). Classification of Rock Masses for Engineering: The RMR System and Future Trends. Rock Testing and Site Characterization, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-042066-0.50028-8 ↗
12. Strength of Rock and Rock Masses
13. Hoek, E., Kaiser, P.K., and Bawden, W.F. (1995). Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock, A.A. Balkema.
14. Practical Estimates of Rock Mass Strength10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X ↗
15. Brady, B.H.G., and Brown, E.T. (2006). Rock Strength and Deformability, Springer. [3rd ed.].
16. Rock Slope Stability Assessment through Rock Mass Classification Systems10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.06.003 ↗
17. Application of Rock Mass Characterization for Determining the Mechanical Properties of Rock Mass: A Comparative Study10.1007/s00603-009-0048-y ↗
18. Porous Media Equivalents for Networks of Discontinuous Fractures10.1029/WR018i003p00645 ↗
19. Numerical Determination of the Equivalent Elastic Compliance Tensor for Fractured Rock Masses Using the Distinct Element Method10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00038-8 ↗
20. Determination of Representative Elementary Volume (REV) for Jointed Rock Masses Exhibiting Scale-Dependent Behavior: A Numerical Investigation10.1186/s40703-021-00164-1 ↗
21. The Significance of in Situ Tests on Large Rock Specimens10.1016/0148-9062(75)90004-2 ↗
22. Goodman, R.E. (1989). Introduction to Rock Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. [2nd ed.].
23. Experimental Studies of Scale Effects on the Shear Behaviour of Rock Joints10.1016/0148-9062(81)90262-X ↗
24. Bandis, S.C. (1990, January 7–8). Scale Effects in the Strength and Deformability of Rocks and Rock Joints. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Scale Effects, in Rock Masses, Loen, Norway.
25. Barton, N. (1990, January 7–8). Scale Effects or Sampling Bias. In Proceeding of the First International Workshop on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Loen, Norway.
26. Fadeev, A.B. (1990, January 7–8). Scale Effect of Rock Strength. In Proceeding of the First International Workshop on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Loen, Norway.
27. Practical Determination of Mechanical Design Parameters of Intact Rock Considering Scale Effect10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.008 ↗
28. Empirical Strength Criterion for Rock Masses10.1061/AJGEB6.0001029 ↗
29. Tani, K. (2001, January 11–13). Scale Effect on Shear Strength of Sedimentary Soft Rocks Observed in Triaxial Compression Test (Influence of Potential Joints). Proceedings of the 36th National Conference of the Japanese Geotechnical Society, Kumamoto, Japan.
30. Mouzannar, H. (2016). Caractérisation de La Résistance Au Cisaillement et Comportement Des Interfaces Entre Béton et Fondation Rocheuse Des Structures Hydrauliques. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lyon].
31. Numerical Modelling of the Gravity-Induced Destabilization of a Slope: The Example of the La Clapière Landslide, Southern France10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.025 ↗
32. Assessment of the Influence of Natural Thermal Cycles on Dolomitic Limestone Rock Columns: A 10-Year Monitoring Study10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109353 ↗
33. Paleo-Landslides on the Meridional Border of the Larzac Plateau (France): Recognition and Predisposing/Triggering Factors10.1007/s10346-024-02422-6 ↗
34. Study Cases of Complex Paleo-Landslides in the South of France10.1007/s10346-024-02329-2 ↗
35. The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice10.1007/BF01261801 ↗
36. Alabouvette, B., Arrondeau, J.P., Aubague, M., Bodeur, Y., Dubois, P., Mattei, J., Paloc, J., and Rançon, J.P. (1988). Notice Explicative de la Feuille le Caylar à 1/50000, BRGM.
37. Karstification Des Plateaux et Encaissement Des Vallées Au Cours Du Néogène et Du Quaternaire Dans Les Grands Causses Méridionaux (Larzac, Blandas)
38. Microstructures of Bedding-Parallel Faults under Multistage Deformation: Examples from the Southeast Basin of France10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104138 ↗
39. Aydin, A. (2009). The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007–2014, Springer International Publishing.
40. The Schmidt Hammer in Rock Material Characterization10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.006 ↗
41. Evaluation of Mechanical Rock Properties Using a Schmidt Hammer10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00004-6 ↗
42. Evaluation of Simple Methods for Assessing the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-9 ↗
43. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classification, John Wiley & Sons.
44. Singh, B., and Goel, R.K. (1999). Chapter-6—Rock Mass Rating (RMR). Rock Mass Classification, Elsevier Science Ltd.10.1016/B978-008043013-3/50006-7 ↗
45. Deere, D.U., Hendron, A.J., Patton, F.D., and Cording, E.J. (1966, January 15–17). Design of Surface and near Surface Construction in Rock. Proceedings of the the 8th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
46. Measurements of and Correlations between Block Size and Rock Quality Designation (RQD)10.1016/j.tust.2005.01.005 ↗
47. The Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion and GSI—2018 Edition10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001 ↗
48. Estimation of Rock Mass Deformation Modulus and Strength of Jointed Hard Rock Masses Using the GSI System10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00025-X ↗
49. Comparison of Quantified and Chart GSI for Four Rock Masses10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.01.002 ↗
50. Alternative Quantification of the Geological Strength Index Chart for Jointed Rocks10.1007/s10706-017-0279-8 ↗
51. Hoek, E., Carter, T.G., and Diederichs, M.S. (2013, January 23–26). Quantification of the Geological Strength Index Chart. Proceedings of the 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA.
52. The Geological Strength Index: Applications and Limitations10.1007/s10064-004-0270-5 ↗
53. A General Analytical Solution for Mohr’s Envelope
54. Estimating Mohr-Coulomb Friction and Cohesion Values from the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion10.1016/0148-9062(90)94333-O ↗
55. Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C., and Corkum, B. (2002). Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion—2002 Edition, Proceedings of the Narms-Tac Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7–10 July 2002, University of Toronto Press.
56. Gasc Barbier, M., and Wassermann, J. (2013). Etude En Laboratoire de l’anisotropie Des Roches Par Méthode Ultrasonique: Application Au Gneiss de Valabres (Alpes-Maritimes). Bull. Lab. Ponts Chaussées, 139–153.
57. (2008). Standard Practices for Preparing Rock Core as Cylindrical Test Specimens and Verifying Conformance to Dimensional and Shape Tolerances (Standard No. ASTM D4543-08).
58. (2008). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens Under Varying States of Stress and Temperatures (Standard No. ASTM D7012-10).
59. The Influence of Crystal Size of Dolomite on Engineering Properties: A Case Study from the Rus Formation, Dammam Dome, Eastern Saudi Arabia10.1007/s10064-024-03549-5 ↗
60. Experimental and Analytical Interpretation of the Behaviour of Laboratory Tests on Composite Specimens10.1016/0148-9062(93)90153-5 ↗
61. Estimating the Geotechnical Properties of Heterogeneous Rock Masses Such as Flysch10.1007/s100640000090 ↗
62. Scale Effects in the Determination of Rock Mass Strength and Deformability10.1007/BF01251024 ↗
63. Evaluation of Rock Mass Deformability Using Empirical Methods—A Review10.1016/j.undsp.2017.03.003 ↗
64. Comparative Study of the Deformation Modulus of Rock Mass10.1007/s10064-016-0974-3 ↗
65. Predicting the Deformation Moduli of Rock Masses10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00062-5 ↗
66. Determining Rock Mass Deformability: Experience from Case Histories10.1016/0148-9062(78)90956-7 ↗
67. Serafim, J.L., and Pereira, J.P. (1983, January 5–8). Considerations on the Geomechanical Classification of Bieniawski. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Geology and Underground Openings, Lisbon, Portugual.
68. Galera, J.M., Alvarez, M., and Bieniawski, Z.T. (2005, January 22–24). Evaluation of the Deformation Modulus of Rock Masses: Comparison of Pressuremeter and Dilatometer Tests with RMR Prediction. Proceedings of the ISP5-PRESSIO 2005 International Symposium, Paris, France.
69. Microstructure Effects on Microcracking and Brittle Failure of Dolomites10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00073-5 ↗