journal article·2025-12-08Open access

Physics-Guided Random Forest Classification of Marine Sediments Using Frequency-Dependent Acoustic Reflection Spectra

Moshe Greenberg, Vladimir Frid

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 24

Abstract

Traditional acoustic seabed classification methods, which are often sensitive to survey geometry and environmental conditions, have limitations in reliability and reproducibility. This study presents a novel physics-guided machine learning framework for automated sediment classification that leverages frequency-dependent acoustic reflection spectra. The framework, tested on two representative sediment types of poorly graded sand (SP) and poorly graded gravel (GP) in controlled laboratory conditions across a frequency range of 100–400 kHz, corrects water-column attenuation and isolates intrinsic sediment responses. Unlike earlier studies that focused solely on attenuation modeling or demonstrated spectral separability without statistical validation, this study embeds physics-guided corrections into a machine-learning pipeline, enabling automated, statistically validated sediment discrimination. Reflection spectra were acquired from 200 samples (100 per class) at 31 frequencies, forming a dataset for classifier evaluation. Random Forest (RF) and Logistic Regression (LR) were benchmarked under identical protocols. RF outperformed LR, achieving peak accuracy of 90% in optimal frequency windows (180–220, 310–350, and 330–370 kHz) and 84% across the full spectrum, compared to LR’s maxima of 82% and 80%. Feature importance revealed that discriminative bands align with wavelengths approximating grain sizes, indicating resonance-like mechanisms. The physics-guided approach demonstrated in this study offers reliable discrimination of sediments with similar grain sizes but different gradations, overcoming a limitation of intensity-only methods. The improved accuracy and interpretability of the classification results have significant implications for future marine survey methods, suggesting that the proposed framework could be a valuable tool for enhancing the efficiency and reliability of seabed characterization. Looking ahead, the potential practical applications of this research are significant, including field trials with autonomous sonar platforms and integration into remote sensing workflows. These applications will be essential to validate the robustness of the approach under real-world variability, paving the way for scalable, real-time seabed classification with implications for a wide range of marine research and applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Underwater Acoustics Research · Coastal and Marine Dynamics · Marine and fisheries research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Department, Sami Shamoon College of Engineering, Jabotinsky 84, Ashdod 77245, Israel

Funding

SCE · Marie Sklodowska-Curie RISE project EffectFact

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Late-Pleistocene evolution of the continental shelf of central Israel, a case study from Hadera10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.008 ↗
2. Innovative method for optimizing Side-Scan Sonar mapping: The blind band unveiled10.1016/j.ecss.2017.05.016 ↗
3. Improving marine habitat mapping using high-resolution acoustic data, a predictive habitat map for the Firth of Lorn, Scotland10.1016/j.csr.2018.09.005 ↗
4. Shallow geophysical exploration at the ancient maritime Maya site of Vista Alegre, Yucatan Mexico
5. Seabed mapping in the Pelagie Islands Marine Protected Area (Sicily Channel, southern Mediterranean) using Remote Sensing Object Based Image Analysis 2 (RSOBIA)10.1007/s11001-018-9371-6 ↗
6. Retrieval of nearshore bathymetry from Sentinel-2A and 2B satellites in South Florida coastal waters10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106277 ↗
7. Measurement of Sounds Emitted by Certain High-Resolution Geophysical Survey Systems10.1109/JOE.2018.2829958 ↗
8. Tayber, Z., Meilijson, A., Ben-Avraham, Z., and Makovsky, Y. (2019). Methane hydrate stability and potential resource in the Levant Basin, southeastern Mediterranean Sea. Geosciences, 9.10.20944/preprints201904.0249.v1 ↗
9. Sun, K., Cui, W., and Chen, C. (2021). Review of underwater sensing technologies and applications. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21237849 ↗
10. Wu, Q., Ding, X., Zhang, Y., and Chen, Z. (2020). Comparative study on seismic response of pile group foundation in coral sand and Fujian sand. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8030189 ↗
11. Liu, B., Chang, S., Zhang, S., Li, Y., Yang, Z., Liu, Z., and Chen, Q. (2022). Seismic-Geological Integrated Study on Sedimentary Evolution and Peat Accumulation Regularity of the Shanxi Formation in Xinjing Mining Area, Qinshui Basin. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15051851 ↗
12. Hydrothermal metalliferous sediments in Red Sea deeps: Formation, characterization and properties10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106720 ↗
13. Picard, L., Baussard, A., Le Chenadec, G., and Quidu, I. (2016, January 19–23). Seafloor characterization for ATR applications using the monogenic signal and the intrinsic dimensionality. Proceedings of the OCEANS Conference, Monterey, CA, USA.10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761372 ↗
14. Spectral structure of surface waves and its influence on sediment dynamics10.1016/j.oceano.2018.07.003 ↗
15. Fonseca, L.E., and Calder, B.R. (2005). Geocoder: An Efficient Backscatter Map Constructor, University of New Hampshire. Available online: https://scholars.unh.edu/ccom/339/.
16. Sea-Bed Characterization and Classification from the Power Spectra of Side-Scan Sonar Data10.1007/BF01204151 ↗
17. Multi-angle backscatter classification and sub-bottom profiling for improved seafloor characterization10.1007/s11001-017-9325-4 ↗
18. Using Multibeam Backscatter Data to Investigate Sediment-Acoustic Relationships10.1029/2017JC013638 ↗
19. Wavelet analysis of bathymetric sidescan sonar data for the classification of seafloor sediments in Hopvågen Bay-Norway10.1023/B:MARI.0000018239.07561.76 ↗
20. Remote estimation of surficial seafloor properties through the application of Angular Range Analysis to multibeam sonar data10.1007/s11001-007-9019-4 ↗
21. Kushnir, U., and Frid, V. (2022). Spectral Acoustic Fingerprints of Sand and Sandstone Sea Bottoms. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10121923 ↗
22. Acoustic seabed classification: Current practice and future directions10.1093/icesjms/fsn061 ↗
23. Analysis of calibrated seafloor backscatter for habitat classification methodology and case study of 158 spots in the Bay of Biscay and Celtic Sea10.1007/s11001-018-9342-y ↗
24. Seafloor sediment classification from single beam echo sounder data using LVQ network10.1007/s11001-007-9016-7 ↗
25. A feedforward neural network for source range and ocean seabed classification using time-domain features10.1121/2.0001077 ↗
26. An automatic approach to the detection and extraction of mine features in sidescan sonar10.1109/JOE.2002.808199 ↗
27. Seabed characterization through a range of high-resolution acoustic systems—A case study offshore Oman10.1007/s11001-005-5999-0 ↗
28. Langner, F., Knauer, C., Jans, W., and Ebert, A. (2009, January 11–14). Side Scan Sonar Image Resolution and Automatic Object Detection, Classification and Identification. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2009—Europe Conference, Bremen, Germany.10.1109/OCEANSE.2009.5278183 ↗
29. Angular range analysis of acoustic themes from Stanton Banks Ireland: A link between visual interpretation and multibeam echosounder angular signatures10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.09.008 ↗
30. Integrated method for the detection and location of underwater pipelines10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.05.001 ↗
31. Nait-Chabane, A., Zerr, B., and Le Chenadec, G. (2013, January 10–14). Sidescan sonar imagery segmentation with a combination of texture and spectral analysis. Proceedings of the OCEANS-Bergen Conference, Bergen, Norway.10.1109/OCEANS-Bergen.2013.6608096 ↗
32. Kushnir, U., and Frid, V. (2023). Spectrum-based logistic regression modeling for the sea bottom soil categorization. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202305.1212.v1 ↗
33. Acoustic seabed segmentation from direct statistical clustering of entire multibeam sonar backscatter curves10.1016/j.csr.2010.12.002 ↗
34. Deep learning model for seabed sediment classification based on fuzzy ranking feature optimization10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106390 ↗
35. Seabed classification using physics-based modeling and machine learning10.1121/10.0001728 ↗
36. Gaida, T.C., Mohammadloo, T.H., Snellen, M., and Simons, D.G. (2020). Mapping the seabed and shallow subsurface with multi-frequency multibeam echosounders. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12010052 ↗
37. DNN-based seabed classification using differently weighted MBES multifeatures10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106519 ↗
38. Sea-floor classification using multibeam echo-sounding angular backscatter data: A real-time approach employing hybrid neural network architecture10.1109/JOE.2002.808211 ↗
39. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
40. A random forest guided tour10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 ↗
41. Variable selection using random forests10.1016/j.patrec.2010.03.014 ↗
42. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
43. Consistency of random forests10.1214/15-AOS1321 ↗
44. Consistency of random forests and other averaging classifiers
45. Random forests for classification in ecology10.1890/07-0539.1 ↗
46. Ma, H., Lai, X., Hu, T., Fu, X., Zhang, X., and Song, S. (2025). Seafloor sediment classification using small-sample multi-beam data based on convolutional neural networks. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.3390/jmse13040671 ↗
47. Seafloor classification by fusing AUV acoustic and magnetic data: Toward complex deep-sea environments
48. Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures10.1016/j.csda.2007.08.015 ↗
49. Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A.-L., Zeileis, A., and Hothorn, T. (2007). Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinform., 8.10.1186/1471-2105-8-25 ↗
50. Mehtaj, N., and Banerjee, S. (2025). Scientific machine learning for elastic and acoustic wave propagation: Neural operator and physics-guided neural network. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25123588 ↗
51. Louppe, G. (2015). Understanding Random Forests: From Theory to Practice. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liège].
52. Ensemble approach to deep learning seabed classification using multichannel ship noise10.1121/10.0036221 ↗
53. Greenberg, M., Kushnir, U., and Frid, V. (2025). Innovative regression model for frequency-dependent acoustic source strength in the aquatic environment: Bridging scientific insight and practical applications. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25051560 ↗
54. Greenberg, M., Kushnir, U., and Frid, V. (2025). Frequency-dependent acoustic reflection for soil classification in a controlled aquatic environment. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15094870 ↗
55. Machine Learning in Geosciences: A Review of Complex Environmental Monitoring Applications10.3390/make6020059 ↗