journal article·2025-12-03Open access

A Physics-Constrained Method for the Precise Spatiotemporal Prediction of Rock-Damage Evolution

Shaohong Yan, Zikun Tian, Yanbo Zhang, Xulong Yao, Zhigang Tao, Shuai Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Accurately predicting the spatiotemporal evolution of rock-damage zones is vital for underground engineering safety. Using three-dimensional data obtained from uniaxial compression–acoustic emission tests, this study addresses the key limitations of existing data-driven methods, which struggle with spatial heterogeneity and often yield predictions that deviate from fundamental fracture-mechanics principles. To overcome these challenges, we propose a physics-constrained spatiotemporal STConvLSTM framework that integrates a density-adaptive point cloud–voxel conversion mechanism for improved 3D representation, a composite loss incorporating structural and physics-based constraints, and a multi-level encoder–processor–decoder architecture enhanced by 3D convolutions, attention modules, and residual connections. Experimental results demonstrate superior accuracy and physical consistency, achieving 92.6% accuracy and an F1-score of 0.947, outperforming ConvLSTM and UNet3D baselines. The physics-aware constraints effectively suppress non-physical divergence and yield damage morphologies that better align with expected fracture-mechanics behavior. These findings show that coupling data-driven learning with physics-based regularization substantially enhances model reliability and interpretability. Overall, the proposed framework offers a robust and practical paradigm for 3D damage-evolution modeling, supporting more-dependable early-warning, stability assessment, and intelligent support-design applications in underground engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mining Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China

Green Intelligent Mining Technology Innovation Center of Hebei Province, Tangshan 063210, China

School of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China

State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, Beijing 100083, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. In-situ micro-CT damage analysis of carbon and carbon/glass hybrid laminates under tensile loading by image reconstruction and DVC technology10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107844 ↗
2. Gravity Gradient Inversion of Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer Satellite Data for the Lithospheric Density Structure in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Region and the Surrounding Regions10.1029/2020JB021291 ↗
3. Progressive damage visualization and tensile failure analysis of three-dimensional braided composites by acoustic emission and micro-CT10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106881 ↗
4. Yang, Z., Cheng, Z., and Wu, D. (2025). Deep learning driven prediction and comparative study of surrounding rock deformation in high speed railway tunnels. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-09791-5 ↗
5. Long-term and short-term constitutive model of rock based on deep learning and deformation prediction of sandy limestone
6. Research on rock fracture evolution prediction model based on Adam-ConvLSTM and transfer learning10.1007/s42452-025-06661-7 ↗
7. Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Jiao, S., Zhao, Y., Deng, W., Xue, B., and Wen, X. (2025). Prediction Method for Surface Settlement during Underground Mining in Mines Based on LSTM-DCNN and Transfer Learning. Min. Res. Dev., 1–9.
8. Rockburst Intensity Prediction Model Based on Newton–Raphson Algorithm and BP Neural Network
9. CNN-LSTM Rockburst Intensity Grade Prediction Model Based on Fusion Optimization Algorithm under Unbalanced Data
10. Zhou, Y., and Tuzel, O. (2018, January 18–22). VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud-Based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00472 ↗
11. Qi, C.R., Yi, L., Su, H., and Guibas, L.J. (2017, January 4–9). PointNet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Long Beach, CA, USA.
12. PVLF: Point–Voxel Local Feature Fusion for 3D Detection10.1007/s44163-025-00299-5 ↗
13. Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Survey10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3005434 ↗
14. Liu, Z., Tang, H., Lin, Y., and Han, S. (2019, January 8–14). Point–Voxel CNN for Efficient 3D Deep Learning. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
15. Graham, B., and van der Maaten, L. (2018, January 18–22). Submanifold Sparse Convolutional Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
16. Choy, C., Gwak, J., and Savarese, S. (2019, January 15–20). 4D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00319 ↗
17. Physics-informed neural networks10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
18. Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data
19. Phase-field modeling of fracture with physics-informed deep learning10.1016/j.cma.2024.117104 ↗
20. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
21. 3D U-Net: Learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotationn
22. Zhang, L., Lu, L., Wang, X., Zhu, R.M., Bagheri, M., Summers, R.M., and Yao, J. (2019). Spatio-Temporal ConvLSTMs for Tumor Growth Prediction by Learning 4D Longitudinal Patient Data. arXiv.10.1109/TMI.2019.2943841 ↗
23. Research on Rock Damage Acoustic Emission Detection and Imaging Method Based on Regional Correlation
24. Yao, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Tao, Z., Liang, P., and Zhao, J. (2024). Effect of regionalized structures on rock fracture process. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-60849-2 ↗
25. Cheng, Y., Hagan, P., Mitra, R., Wang, S., and Yang, H.-W. (2021). Experimental investigation of progressive failure using 3D acoustic emission tomography. Front. Earth Sci., 9.10.3389/feart.2021.765030 ↗
26. Three-Dimensional AE Source Localization for Layered Rock Considering Anisotropic P-Wave Velocity10.1007/s10064-024-03692-z ↗
27. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., and Kweon, I.S. (2018, January 8–14). CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗
28. Wang, J., Yu, Z., Luan, Z., Ren, J., Zhao, Y., and Yu, G. (2022). RDAU-Net: Residual CNN with DFP and CBAM for Brain Tumor Segmentation. Front. Oncol., 12.10.3389/fonc.2022.805263 ↗
29. 3D convolutional neural networks for human action recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2012.59 ↗
30. Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-K., and Woo, W.-C. (2015, January 7–12). Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (NeurIPS 2015, Montreal, QC, Canada.
31. Yu, X., Wu, Y., Bai, Y., Han, H., Chen, L., Gao, H., Wei, H., and Wang, M. (2022). A lightweight 3D UNet model for glioma grading. Phys. Med. Biol., 67.10.1088/1361-6560/ac7d33 ↗
32. Comprehensive early warning of rockburst from MS–AE–EMR signals via deep learning10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105519 ↗
33. Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation10.1016/j.media.2020.101851 ↗