journal article·2025-12-03Open access

In Situ Permeability Measurements and Impedance Spectroscopy for Assessing Separation Performance and Nano-Structure in CO2-Selective Polymeric Mixed-Matrix Membrane

Dionysios S. Karousos, George Maistros, George V. Theodorakopoulos, Anastasios Gotzias, Andreas A. Sapalidis, Stéphan Barbe, Evangelos P. Favvas

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

A hollow fiber-supported polymeric mixed-matrix membrane, consisting of a Pebax-1657 matrix and graphene nanoplatelet (GNP) fillers as the selective layer, was tested for CO2/CH4 gas separation at transmembrane pressures up to 30 bar(a). Using a custom, novel, membrane module, we simultaneously performed permeability/selectivity and in situ electric impedance spectroscopy measurements. This in situ technique is proposed here for the first time. Furthermore, stable mixed-gas selectivities, for 10% CO2 in CH4 gas, reaching up to 61.4 (M0) and 68.5 after heat treatment (M2) were observed at 20–30 bar(a), whereas the stressed state (M1) dropped to ~22. Throughout the whole procedure of the three (initial, degraded, and restored) membrane testing assessments, a gradual decline in gas permeability coupled with a corresponding increase in the membrane’s AC resistance, due to membrane compaction, was evident. More specific, the membrane’s AC resistance, R1, increased from ~96–147 ΜΩ (M0) to ~402–435 ΜΩ (M1) and ~5390–5700 ΜΩ (M2), while the peak-phase frequency fp decreased from ~1.25 kHz (M0) to ~340 Hz (M1) and ~115 Hz (M2). Overall, this work proposes a new tool/method for connecting membrane’s deterioration phenomena with AC resistance and demonstrates that a facile heat treatment can restore selectivity following compaction, despite the absence of full permeance recovery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Catalysts for Methane Reforming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Aghia Paraskevi, 15341 Athens, Greece

ADVISE, 17 Gymnasiarchou Madia St., 82100 Chios, Greece

Faculty of Applied Natural Sciences, Technische Hochschule Köln, Campus Leverkusen, Campusplatz 1, 51379 Leverkusen, Germany

Funding

General Secretariat for Research and Innovation · German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Rahimpour, M.R., Farsi, M., and Makarem, M.A. (2020). CO2 removal from natural gas. Advances in Carbon Capture, Woodhead Publishing.
2. Kadirkhan, F., Goh, P.S., Ismail, A.F., Wan Mustapa, W.N.F., Halim, M.H.M., Soh, W.K., and Yeo, S.Y. (2022). Recent Advances of Polymeric Membranes in Tackling Plasticization and Aging for Practical Industrial CO2/CH4 Applications—A Review. Membranes, 12.10.3390/membranes12010071 ↗
3. Mazumder, M.A.J., Sheardown, H., and Al-Ahmed, A. (2019). Polymeric Membranes for Natural Gas Processing: Polymer Synthesis and Membrane Gas Transport Properties. Functional Polymers, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-95987-0 ↗
4. Drioli, E., and Giorno, L. (2016). Membranes for Natural Gas Sweetening. Encyclopedia of Membranes, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4 ↗
5. Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading10.1039/C5RA00666J ↗
6. Membrane-based technologies for biogas upgrading: A review10.1007/s10311-020-01036-3 ↗
7. Long-term performance of highly selective carbon hollow fiber membranes for biogas upgrading in the presence of H2S and water vapor10.1016/j.cej.2022.137615 ↗
8. Mirza, N., and Kearns, D. (2022). State of the Art: CCS Technologies, Global CCS Institute.
9. Monitoring the CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Process at the Nanoscale: An In-Situ Neutron Scattering Study10.1039/D1YA00058F ↗
10. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019). Sequestration of Supercritical CO2 in Deep Sedimentary Geological Formations. Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda, The National Academies Press.
11. Karousos, D.S., Theodorakopoulos, G.V., He, X., Romanos, G.E., Brunetti, A., and Favvas, E.P. (2025). A comprehensive review of pristine Pebax-1657 membranes for CO2 gas separations. Chem. Eng. J., 170938.10.1016/j.cej.2025.170938 ↗
12. Possart, W., and Brede, M. (2019). Ageing Phenomena in Polymers: A Short Survey. Adhesive Joints: Ageing and Durability of Epoxies and Polyurethanes, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. [1st ed.].10.1002/9783527803743 ↗
13. Domininghaus, H. (2012). Kunststoffe: Eigenschaften und Anwendungen, Springer. [8th ed.].10.1007/978-3-642-16173-5 ↗
14. Drioli, E., and Giorno, L. (2014). Membrane Compaction. Encyclopedia of Membranes, Springer.
15. Improved operational stability of Pebax-based gas separation membranes with ZIF-8: A comparative study of flat sheet and composite hollow fibre membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.048 ↗
16. Polymer Additives with Gas Barrier and Anti-Aging Properties Made from Asphaltenes via Supercritical Ethanol10.1002/advs.202307619 ↗
17. Enhanced CO2-selective behavior of Pebax-1657: A comparative study between the influence of graphene-based fillers10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106264 ↗
18. Graphene nanoplatelets based polyimide/Pebax dual-layer mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes for CO2/CH4 and He/N2 separations10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103588 ↗
19. Improving CO2/CH4 separation efficiency of Pebax-1657 membrane by adding Al2O3 nanoparticles in its matrix10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103019 ↗
20. Materials dependence of mixed gas plasticization behavior in asymmetric membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.048 ↗
21. Pebax–PEG–MWCNT hybrid membranes with enhanced CO2 capture properties10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.036 ↗
22. Pebax®/polyethylene glycol blend thin film composite membranes for CO2 separation: Performance with mixed gases10.1016/j.seppur.2008.01.001 ↗
23. Poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(dimethyl siloxane): Combining their advantages into efficient CO2 gas separation membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.008 ↗
24. Composite amine mixed matrix membranes for high- pressure CO2–CH4 separation: Synthesis, characterization and performance evaluation10.1098/rsos.200795 ↗
25. Synthesis and Gas Transport Properties of Hydroxyl-Functionalized Polyimides with Intrinsic Microporosity10.1021/ma300549m ↗
26. Functionalized copolyimide membranes for the separation of gaseous and liquid mixtures10.3762/bjoc.6.86 ↗
27. In-situ monitoring techniques for membrane fouling and local filtration characteristics in hollow fiber membrane processes: A critical review10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.030 ↗
28. A review of in situ real-time monitoring techniques for membrane fouling in the biotechnology, biorefinery and food sectors10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117221 ↗
29. Bakhtin, D.S., Sokolov, S.E., Borisov, I.L., Volkov, V.V., Volkov, A.V., and Samoilov, V.O. (2023). Mitigation of Physical Aging of Polymeric Membrane Materials for Gas Separation: A Review. Membranes, 13.10.3390/membranes13050519 ↗
30. In situ monitoring of nonlinear physical aging and anti-aging in polymer-based separation membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124054 ↗
31. Pairing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy with conducting membranes for the in situ characterization of membrane fouling10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118680 ↗
32. Onset, rate, and depth of wetting front progression in membrane distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123253 ↗
33. Noninvasive monitoring of fouling in membrane processes by optical coherence tomography: A review10.1016/j.memsci.2023.122291 ↗
34. Critical flux of colloidal foulant in microfiltration: Effect of organic solvent10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118531 ↗
35. Biofouling in reverse osmosis processes: The roles of flux, crossflow velocity and concentration polarization in biofilm development10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.052 ↗
36. Organic composition in feed solution of forward osmosis membrane systems has no impact on the boron and water flux but reduces scaling10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118306 ↗
37. Joens, M.S., Huynh, C., Kasuboski, J.M., Ferranti, D., Sigal, Y.J., Zeitvogel, F., Obst, M., Burkhardt, C.J., Curran, K.P., and Chalasani, S.H. (2013). Helium Ion Microscopy (HIM) for the imaging of biological samples at sub-nanometer resolution. Sci. Rep., 3.10.1038/srep03514 ↗
38. In-situ measurements of gas permeability in fuel cell membranes using a cylindrical microelectrode10.1016/S0022-0728(01)00698-2 ↗
39. Membrane Based Measurement Technology for in situ Monitoring of Gases in Soil10.3390/s90200756 ↗
40. Craster, B., and Jones, T.G.J. (2019). Permeation of a Range of Species through Polymer Layers under Varying Conditions of Temperature and Pressure: In Situ Measurement Methods. Polymers, 11.10.3390/polym11061056 ↗
41. Flexible PEBAX/graphene electromagnetic shielding composite films with a negative pressure effect of resistance for pressure sensors applications10.1039/C9RA08679J ↗
42. Polymer nanocomposites based on Graphite Nanoplatelets and amphiphilic graphene platelets10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110223 ↗
43. A review on the mechanics of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced structures10.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.103831 ↗
44. Investigation on the use of graphene oxide as novel surfactant to stabilize weakly charged graphene nanoplatelets10.1186/s11671-015-0882-7 ↗
45. Cataldi, P., Athanassiou, A., and Bayer, I.S. (2018). Graphene Nanoplatelets-Based Advanced Materials and Recent Progress in Sustainable Applications. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8091438 ↗
46. Effects of adding graphene nanoplatelets and nanocarbon aerogels to epoxy resins and their carbon fiber composites10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107869 ↗
47. Well-established carbon nanomaterials: Modification, characterization and dispersion study at different solvents10.1007/s10853-024-09413-x ↗
48. Vasileiou, A.N., Theodorakopoulos, G.V., Karousos, D.S., Bouroushian, M., Sapalidis, A.A., and Favvas, E.P. (2023). Nanocarbon-Based Mixed Matrix Pebax-1657 Flat Sheet Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation. Membranes, 13.10.3390/membranes13050470 ↗
49. Cellulose-based carbon hollow fiber membranes for high-pressure mixed gas separation of CO2/CH4 and CO2/N210.1016/j.seppur.2020.117473 ↗
50. Analysis of Impedance and Admittance Data for Solids and Liquids10.1149/1.2133473 ↗
51. Poly(ether–amide) vs. poly(ether–imide) copolymers for post-combustion membrane separation processes10.1039/C5RA01328C ↗
52. The effects of air gap length on the internal and external morphology of hollow fiber membranes10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00186-6 ↗
53. High-performance composite hollow fiber membrane for flue gas and air separations10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.014 ↗
54. Thin poly(ether-block-amide)/attapulgite composite membranes with improved CO2 permeance and selectivity for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH410.1016/j.ces.2016.11.037 ↗
55. Membrane gas separation: A review/state of the art10.1021/ie8019032 ↗
56. A pragmatic thermal treatment strategy for improved gas separation in 2D zeolite-based mixed matrix membranes10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133246 ↗
57. Mogbojuri, G., Abtahi, S., Hendeniya, N., and Chang, B. (2025). The Effects of Chain Conformation and Nanostructure on the Dielectric Properties of Polymers. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18010198 ↗
58. Smart conducting polymer composites having zero temperature coefficient of resistance10.1039/C4NR04489D ↗
59. Lightweight and conductive carbon black/chlorinated poly(propylene carbonate) foams with a remarkable negative temperature coefficient effect of resistance for temperature sensor applications10.1039/C8TC02123F ↗
60. Low percolation threshold in highly conducting graphene nanoplatelets/glass composite coatings10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.030 ↗
61. Membrane dehydration with increasing current density at high inlet gas relative humidity in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.001 ↗