Deep-Learning Dose-Driven Approach to Optimize Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Program in Radiotherapy
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone of cancer treatment, with patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) being essential for patient safety. However, PSQA can be time-consuming, particularly in high-throughput centers. Machine learning and deep learning (DL) offer tools to efficiently analyze large datasets and support data-driven workflows. Methods: DL was applied to predict PSQA outcomes for clinical RT plans delivered with 6 MV and 6 FFF MV. A retrospective dataset of 839 VMAT plans was used to extract 4470 dosiomic features from five automatic isodose contours. The dataset was split into training and test subsets. Two hybrid models were developed to identify plans with γ-passing rates below the median QA value (97%). A prospective dataset of 201 PSQA measurements was used for validation. Results: Both models demonstrated strong predictive performance. In the test set, Hybrid-1 achieved 0.74 specificity and 0.64 sensitivity, while Hybrid-2 reached 0.72 specificity and 0.52 sensitivity. Similar results were observed in the prospective validation cohort. Conclusion: Applying deep learning to dose distributions with carefully engineered features allows accurate identification of RT plans that require PSQA. This approach facilitates more efficient allocation of both personnel and linear accelerator time, thereby supporting safer and more streamlined PSQA workflows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2024). Global cancer burden growing, amidst mounting need for services. Saudi Med. J., 45, 326–327.
2. The Evolution of Radiation Therapy in Treating Cancer10.1016/j.soncn.2018.03.006 ↗
3. Clinical Radiation Oncology10.1006/gyno.2001.6126 ↗
4. Estimating the demand for radiotherapy from the evidence: A review of changes from 2003 to 201210.1016/j.radonc.2014.03.024 ↗
5. Zwanenburg, A., Leger, S., Vallières, M., and Löck, S. (2016). Image biomarker standardisation initiative. arXiv.
6. Dosimetric characteristics of the novel 2D ionization chamber array OCTAVIUS Detector 150010.1118/1.4914151 ↗
7. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 21810.1002/mp.12810 ↗
8. Technical Note: Plastimatch mabs, an open source tool for automatic image segmentation10.1118/1.4961121 ↗
9. Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339 ↗
10. Van Rossum, G., and Drake, F.L. (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual, CreateSpace.
11. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015, January 6–11). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
12. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., and Isard, M. (2016, January 2–4). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Savannah, GA, USA.
13. Multicentric evaluation of a machine learning model to streamline the radiotherapy patient specific quality assurance process10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102593 ↗
14. Huang, Y., Pi, Y., Ma, K., Miao, X., Fu, S., Chen, H., Wang, H., Gu, H., Shao, Y., and Duan, Y. (2021). Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: Classification, Gamma Passing Rates Prediction, and Dose Difference Prediction. Front. Oncol., 11.10.3389/fonc.2021.700343 ↗
15. Miao, J., Xu, Y., Men, K., and Dai, J. (2025). A feasibility study of deep learning prediction model for VMAT patient-specific QA. Front. Oncol., 15.10.3389/fonc.2025.1509449 ↗
16. Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: Prediction accuracy and cost-sensitive classification performance10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104500 ↗
17. Commissioning and clinical implementation of an Autoencoder based Classification-Regression model for VMAT patient-specific QA in a multi-institution scenario10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.024 ↗
18. A StarGAN and transformer-based hybrid classification-regression model for multi-institution VMAT patient-specific quality assurance10.1002/mp.17485 ↗