journal article·2025-11-28Open access

A Component-Oriented Model for Risk Assessment in the Design of High-Tech Products

Roman Trishch, Liudmyla Lutai, Eduard Khomiak, Zbigniew Krzysiak, Waldemar Samociuk, Edvin Hevorkian, Paweł Stączek, Miroslaw Rucki

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

This study proposes a component-based model for assessing risks in the design of high-tech products. The model took into account the novelty of components, which affected the risk level in the development process. The risk assessment was based on fuzzy set theory, which allowed determination of the degree of importance of risk-generating factors, such as technical, economic, and organizational risks. The components were divided into “old” ones with the possibility of adaptation and “new” ones being implemented for the first time. The structure of the project included adaptation, acquisition, and development of new components. The component-oriented approach allowed for a reduction in the negative impact of risks in the early stages of development while optimizing decision-making on further product development. A case study involving the development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) was conducted to demonstrate the model’s applicability. The assessed aggregated project risk varied from 0.0992 for projects based primarily on reusable components to 0.1902 for those involving a high proportion of newly developed components. The model’s sensitivity to component novelty made it possible to differentiate between low- and moderate-risk design scenarios. This is especially valuable for early-stage project selection and risk-informed “go/no-go” decisions in the design of complex systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Product Development and Customization · Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications · Technology Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechatronics and Electrical Engineering, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”, 17 V.Manko Str., 61070 Kharkiv, Ukraine

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Casimir Pulaski Radom University, 54 Stasieckiego, 26-600 Radom, Poland

Department of Automation, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

Institute of Mechanical Science, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 11 Sauletekio al., LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Assessing risk of AR and organizational changes factors in socio-technical robotic manufacturing10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102731 ↗
2. Comparison of risk assessment approaches and analyzes used in technical transport systems10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.176 ↗
3. Review on design, development, and implementation of an unmanned aerial vehicle for various applications10.1007/s41315-024-00359-6 ↗
4. Mechanical Verification of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Extended Detection Device
5. Enhancing Longitudinal Flight Stability of Electric-powered Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Fuzzy Proportional-integral-derivative Control10.1007/s12555-024-0930-0 ↗
6. A Comprehensive Review on Advancements in Noise Reduction for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)10.1007/s42417-024-01480-3 ↗
7. The Creation of an Optimisation Component-Oriented Model for the Formation of the Architecture of Science-Based Products
8. Affiliation of Optimum Risk Engineering Tools to Technical Facility Management Main Targets Achievement
9. A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.106 ↗
10. Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.005 ↗
11. An interval probability-based FMEA model for risk assessment: A real-world case10.1002/qre.2563 ↗
12. Applications of machine learning methods for engineering risk assessment—A review10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.015 ↗
13. Risk management in construction projects10.3846/20294913.2014.994582 ↗
14. Fine-Kinney method based on fuzzy logic for natural gas pipeline project risk assessment10.1007/s00500-023-09108-6 ↗
15. Supply chain risk management by monte carlo method
16. Pratiwi, A.A., Wessiani, N., Dzakiyah, H., and Nurhalizah, U. (2021, January 2–5). Aircraft redelivery project risk assessment: A case study in maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) company. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rome, Italy.10.46254/SA02.20210682 ↗
17. Ilczuk, P., and Kycko, M. (2023). Risk Assessment in the Design of Railroad Control Command and Signaling Devices Using Fuzzy Sets. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132212460 ↗
18. Mediouni, B.L., Dragomir, I., Nouri, A., and Bensalem, S. (2025, September 12). Quantitative Risk Assessment in the Design of Resilient Systems. Verimag Research Report No. TR-2018-10. Available online: https://www-verimag.imag.fr/TR/TR-2018-10.pdf.
19. Risk Areas Determination for Autonomous- and Semi-autonomous Aerial Systems Considering Run-Time Technical Reliability Assessment10.1007/s10846-019-01056-4 ↗
20. Attribute reduction methods in fuzzy rough set theory: An overview, comparative experiments, and new directions10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107353 ↗
21. A risk evaluation method to prioritize failure modes based on failure data and a combination of fuzzy sets theory and grey theory10.1016/j.engappai.2019.03.023 ↗
22. Output feedback fault-tolerant control by a set-theoretic description of T–S fuzzy systems
23. Risk Assessment Using the PFDA-FMEA Integrated Method10.12776/qip.v26i3.1772 ↗
24. A Novel Project Risk Assessment Method Development via AHP-TOPSIS Hybrid Algorithm10.28991/esj-2020-01239 ↗
25. Tonkonogyi, V., Ivanov, V., Trojanowska, J., Oborskyi, G., and Pavlenko, I. (2022). A general approach for tolerance control in Quality Assessment for Technology Quality Analysis. Advanced Manufacturing Processes IV. InterPartner 2022, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-031-16651-8 ↗
26. Tonkonogyi, V., Ivanov, V., Trojanowska, J., Oborskyi, G., and Pavlenko, I. (2021). Mathematic model of the general approach to tolerance control in Quality Assessment. Advanced Manufacturing Processes III. InterPartner 2021, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-030-91327-4 ↗
27. Trishch, R., Nechuiviter, O., Hrinchenko, H., Bubela, T., Riabchykov, M., and Pandova, I. (2023). Assessment of safety risks using qualimetric methods. MM Sci. J., 6668–6674.10.17973/MMSJ.2023_10_2023021 ↗
28. TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021 ↗
29. Product development methodology “scalability”10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.125 ↗
30. Complex Evaluation of the Negative Variations in the Development of Lithuanian Municipalities
31. Risk assessment of complex engineering project based on fuzzy Petri net under the perspective of vulnerability10.3846/jcem.2023.19517 ↗
32. Mansor, M.A., and Flayyih, S.S. (2025). Risk assessment of prefabricated construction in Iraq using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15101622 ↗
33. Zhong, C., and Peng, J. (2024). Quality risk assessment of prefabricated steel structural components during production using fuzzy Bayesian networks. Buildings, 14.10.21203/rs.3.rs-4346784/v1 ↗
34. An extended SECA-GDM method considering flexible linguistic scale optimization and its application in occupational health and safety risk assessment10.1016/j.aej.2024.01.026 ↗
35. Basics on Categorizing Travel-Time-Based Degrees of Satisfaction Using Triangular Fuzzy-Membership Functions10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.198 ↗
36. A proposed model for measuring the aggregative risk degree of implementing an RFID digital campus system with the consistent fuzzy preference relations10.1016/j.apm.2012.06.029 ↗
37. The Impact of Alternative Data on Default Probability: Analyzing the Italian E-commerce Sector with NLP and Network Structures10.1007/s43069-025-00442-z ↗
38. Risk of catastrophic failure of the reactor for urea synthesis
39. Selection of appropriate defuzzification methods: Application to the assessment of dam performance10.1016/j.eswa.2016.09.004 ↗
40. (2018). Risk Management—Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 31000:2018).
41. (2019). Risk Management—Risk Assessment Techniques (Standard No. IEC 31010:2019).
42. (2021). Systems and Software Engineering—Life Cycle Processes—Risk Management (Standard No. ISO/IEC 16085).
43. Fuzzy dissimilarities and the fuzzy Choquet integral of triangular fuzzy numbers on [0, 1]10.1016/j.fss.2025.109277 ↗
44. Possibilistic mean based defuzzification for fuzzy expert systems and fuzzy control—LSD for general fuzzy sets10.1016/j.cam.2023.115663 ↗
45. A dual circular strategies hierarchy as a guiding framework for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction: Focus on Ukraine10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146478 ↗