Cross-Validated Neural Network Optimization for Explainable Energy Prediction in Industrial Mobile Robots
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate energy prediction is essential for energy-aware planning and navigation of autonomous mobile robots (AMRs). This study investigates whether a compact feed-forward neural network (FFNN) can predict relative energy consumption from operational variables with high accuracy and interpretability. Using a curated dataset of controlled translation and rotation trials on a KUKA KMP 1500P, energy demand is expressed as the per-trial reduction in battery state of charge (SoC), defined as N1%. For unit-free reporting, it is also considered the normalized SoC consumed per trial, defined as E=1/N1%. Model development followed a two-stage optimization pipeline, (i) systematic feature-subset screening and (ii) cross-validated architecture and regularization search with early stopping, assessed by a composite of MSE, MAE, R2, and the 68th-percentile absolute error (∆X68) as the prediction precision index. The selected FFNN (ReLU multilayer perceptron with L2 weight decay) achieved strong generalization on the independent test set (MAE = 0.9954, MSE = 4.5512, R2 = 0.9795, ∆X68 = 0.0193). Post hoc explainability methods (SHAP and input perturbation) identified angular velocity and linear acceleration as the dominant predictors, with payload mass exerting secondary effects. These results demonstrate that a compact, regularized FFNN provides accurate, repeatable, and interpretable energy predictions suitable for integration into digital twin platforms and downstream industrial scheduling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Systems and Automatic Control, Faculty of Engineering of Vitoria-Gasteiz, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Nieves Cano, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
Research & Development Department, Aldakin, 31800 Altsasu, Spain
Electrical Department, Faculty of Engineering of Vitoria-Gasteiz, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), C/Nieves Cano 12, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
Funding
Government of the Basque Country through the research program
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis and Simulation of an Urban-Industrial Sustainable Energy Community: A Use Case in San Juan de Mozarrifar Using Photovoltaic Energy10.1016/j.egyr.2022.12.059 ↗
2. The Role of Energy Use in Testing N—Shaped Relation between Industrial Development and Environmental Quality for Chinese Economy10.1016/j.esr.2022.100905 ↗
3. Industrial Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation10.1007/s12053-008-9032-8 ↗
4. Industrial Robots and Air Environment: A Moderated Mediation Model of Population Density and Energy Consumption10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.015 ↗
5. The Impact of Industrial Robots Application on Air Pollution in China: Mechanisms of Energy Use Efficiency and Green Technological Innovation10.1177/00368504221144093 ↗
6. Popescu, C.A., Olteanu, S.C., Ifrim, A.M., Petcu, C., Silvestru, C.I., and Ilie, D.M. (2024). The Influence of Energy Consumption and the Environmental Impact of Electronic Components on the Structures of Mobile Robots Used in Logistics. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16198396 ↗
7. A Review on Energy Efficiency in Autonomous Mobile Robots
8. Jaiem, L., Druon, S., Lapierre, L., and Crestani, D. (2016). A Step toward Mobile Robots Autonomy: Energy Estimation Models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Proceedings of the Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (TAROS 2016), Sheffield, UK, 1–26 June 2016, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-40379-3_18 ↗
9. ISO 50001 Standard-Based Energy Management Maturity Model—Proposal and Validation in Industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.023 ↗
10. Robotics in Greenhouses. Scoping Review10.1016/j.compag.2024.108750 ↗
11. Bagagiolo, G., Matranga, G., Cavallo, E., and Pampuro, N. (2022). Greenhouse Robots: Ultimate Solutions to Improve Automation in Protected Cropping Systems—A Review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14116436 ↗
12. Automation in the Greenhouse: Challenges, Opportunities, and a Robotics Case Study10.21273/HORTTECH.2.2.231 ↗
13. Liu, L., Brocanelli, M., Chen, J., and Shi, W. (2019, January 7–9). E2M: An Energy-Efficient Middleware for Computer Vision Applications on Autonomous Mobile Robots. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC 2019), Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/3318216.3363302 ↗
14. Optimization of Energy Consumption in Industrial Robots, a Review10.1016/j.cogr.2023.05.003 ↗
15. A Novel Energy Consumption Model for Autonomous Mobile Robot10.3906/elk-2103-15 ↗
16. Structural Decomposition-Based Energy Consumption Modeling of Robot Laser Processing Systems and Energy-Efficient Analysis10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102327 ↗
17. A Digital Twin Framework for Improving Energy Efficiency and Occupant Comfort in Public and Commercial Buildings10.1186/s42162-021-00153-9 ↗
18. Hou, L., Zhang, L., and Kim, J. (2018). Energy Modeling and Power Measurement for Mobile Robots. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12010027 ↗
19. Zhang, L., Kim, J., and Sun, J. (2019). Energy Modeling and Experimental Validation of Four-Wheel Mecanum Mobile Robots for Energy-Optimal Motion Control. Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11111372 ↗
20. Mei, Y., Lu, Y.H., Hu, Y.C., and Lee, C.S.G. (2005, January 18–20). A Case Study of Mobile Robot’s Energy Consumption and Conservation Techniques. Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Advanced Robotics, ICAR ’05, Seattle, WA, USA.
21. Hou, L., Zhou, F., Kim, K., and Zhang, L. (2021). Practical Model for Energy Consumption Analysis of Omnidirectional Mobile Robot. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051800 ↗
22. Energy Estimation for Differential Drive Mobile Robots on Straight and Rotational Trajectories
23. Aliev, K., Traini, E., Asranov, M., Awouda, A., and Chiabert, P. (2021, January 22–24). Prediction and Estimation Model of Energy Demand of the AMR with Cobot for the Designed Path in Automated Logistics Systems. Proceedings of the Procedia CIRP, Athens, Greece.10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.036 ↗
24. Wallace, N.D., Kong, H., Hill, A.J., and Sukkarieh, S. (2019, January 18–20). Motion Cost Characterisation of an Omnidirectional WMR on Uneven Terrains. Proceedings of the IFAC-PapersOnLine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.043 ↗
25. Patil, S., Desai, S., Patil, A., Phalle, V.M., Handikherkar, V., and Kazi, F.S. (2018, January 9–15). Remaining Useful Life (ruL) Prediction of Rolling Element Bearing Using Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Technique. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.1115/IMECE2018-87623 ↗
26. Deb, S., Goswami, A.K., Chetri, R.L., and Roy, R. (2020, January 16–19). Prediction of Plug-in Electric Vehicle’s State-of-Charge Using Gradient Boosting Method and Random Forest Method. Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES 2020), Jaipur, India.10.1109/PEDES49360.2020.9379906 ↗
27. Energy-Efficient SVM Learning Control System for Biped Walking Robots10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2242486 ↗
28. Nguyen-Tuong, D., Schölkopf, B., and Peters, J. (2009, January 11–15). Sparse Online Model Learning for Robot Control with Support Vector Regression. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), St. Louis, MO, USA.10.1109/IROS.2009.5354609 ↗
29. Multi-Layer Feed-Forward Neural Network Deep Learning Control with Hybrid Position and Virtual-Force Algorithm for Mobile Robot Obstacle Avoidance10.1007/s12555-018-0140-8 ↗
30. BN-LSTM-Based Energy Consumption Modeling Approach for an Industrial Robot Manipulator10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102629 ↗
31. Topić, J., Škugor, B., and Deur, J. (2019). Neural Network-Based Modeling of Electric Vehicle Energy Demand and All Electric Range. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12071396 ↗
32. Caponetto, R., Fortuna, L., and Rizzo, A. (2005, January 19–22). Neural Network Modelling of Fuel Cell Systems for Vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA 2005), Catania, Italy.
33. Examining the Application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for Advancing Energy Efficiency in Building: A Comprehensive Reviews
34. Michailidis, P., Michailidis, I., Gkelios, S., and Kosmatopoulos, E. (2024). Artificial Neural Network Applications for Energy Management in Buildings: Current Trends and Future Directions. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17030570 ↗
35. A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithms
36. Neuman, S.M., Plancher, B., Duisterhof, B.P., Krishnan, S., Banbury, C., Mazumder, M., Prakash, S., Jabbour, J., Faust, A., and Croon, G.C.H.E.D. (2022, January 13–15). Tiny Robot Learning: Challenges and Directions for Machine Learning in Resource-Constrained Robots. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS 2022), Incheon, Republic of Korea.10.1109/AICAS54282.2022.9870000 ↗
37. Machine Learning-Based Movement Scheduling and Management for Autonomous Mobile Robot Navigation
38. Vodovozov, V., Lehtla, M., Raud, Z., Semjonova, N., and Petlenkov, E. (2024). Managing Energy Consumption of Linear Delta Robots Using Neural Network Models. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17164081 ↗
39. Petrichenko, V., Lokstein, L., Thiele, G., and Haninger, K. (2024). Energy Consumption in Robotics: A Simplified Modeling Approach. arXiv.
40. Aggarwal, C.C. (2023). Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-29642-0 ↗
41. Cross-Validation: What Does It Estimate and How Well Does It Do It?10.1080/01621459.2023.2197686 ↗
42. A Survey of Cross-Validation Procedures for Model Selection10.1214/09-SS054 ↗
43. Trustworthy AI and Robotics: Implications for the AEC Industry10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104298 ↗
44. Bound-Guided Hybrid Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Energy-Efficient Robotic Assembly Line Balancing10.1016/j.cie.2020.106604 ↗
45. A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Approach With a Spiking Actor Network for Efficient Robotic Arm Target Reaching10.1109/LRA.2023.3264836 ↗
46. State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938 ↗
47. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.