Augmented Reality-Assisted Micro-Invasive Apicectomy with Markerless Visual–Inertial Odometry: An In Vivo Pilot Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Apicectomy is an endodontic surgical procedure prescribed for persistent periapical pathologies when conventional root canal therapy or retreatment have failed. Accurate intraoperative visualization of the root apex and surrounding structures remains challenging and subject to possible errors. Augmented reality (AR) allows for the addition of real-time digital overlays of the anatomical region, thus potentially improving surgical precision and reducing invasiveness. The purpose of this pilot study is to describe the application of an AR method in cases requiring apicectomy. Materials and Methods: Patients presenting with chronic persistent apical radio-translucency associated with pain underwent AR-assisted apicectomy. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained preoperatively for segmentation of the target root apex and adjacent anatomical structures. A custom visual–inertial odometry (VIO) algorithm was used to map and stabilize the segmented digital 3D models on a portable device in real time, enabling an overlay of digital guides onto the operative field. The duration of preoperative procedures, was recorded. Postoperative pain measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and periapical healing assessed with radiographic evaluations, were recorded at baseline (T0) and at 6 weeks and 6 months (T1–T2) after surgery. Results: AR-assisted apicectomies were successfully performed in all three patients without intraoperative complications. The digital overlap procedure required an average of [1.49 ± 0.34] minutes. VAS scores decreased significantly from T0 to T2, and patients showed radiographic evidence of progressive periapical healing. No patient reported persistent discomfort at follow-up. Conclusion: This preliminary pilot study indicates that AR-assisted apicectomy is feasible and may improve intraoperative visualization with low additional surgical time. Future larger-scale studies with control groups are needed to validate the method proposed and to quantify the outcomes. Clinical Significance: By integrating real-time digital images of bony structures and root morphology, AR guidance during apicectomy may offer enhanced precision for apical resection and may decrease the risk of iatrogenic damage. The use of a visual–inertial odometry-based AR method is a novel technique that demonstrated promising results in terms of VAS and final outcomes, especially in anatomically challenging cases in this preliminary pilot study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Surgical Simulation and Training
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, UOC Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Dentistry Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, 20122 Milan, Italy
Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation, School of Dentistry, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
Independent Researcher, 29121 Parma, Italy
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Farronato, M., Maspero, C., Lanteri, V., Fama, A., Ferrati, F., Pettenuzzo, A., and Farronato, D. (2019). Current state of the art in the use of augmented reality in dentistry: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Oral. Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0808-3 ↗
2. Artificial intelligence and augmented reality for guided implant surgery planning: A proof of concept10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104485 ↗
3. TMJ Pericapsular Guided Injection with Visual-Inertial Odometry (Augmented/Mixed Reality): A Novel Pilot Clinical Approach for Joint Osteoarthrosis Drug Delivery10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105659 ↗
4. Novel method for augmented reality guided endodontics: An in vitro study10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104476 ↗
5. Farronato, M. (2024). System and Method for Dynamic Augmented Reality Imaging of an Anatomical Site. (No. 11,890,148), U.S. Patent.
6. Dental implant placement with immersive technologies: A preliminary clinical report of augmented and mixed reality applications10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.017 ↗
7. Taxonomic discordance of immersive realities in dentistry: A systematic scoping review10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105058 ↗
8. Pellegrino, G., Mangano, C., Mangano, R., Ferri, A., Taraschi, V., and Marchetti, C. (2019). Augmented reality for dental implantology: A pilot clinical report of two cases. BMC Oral. Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0853-y ↗
9. Clinical outcome of guided endodontics versus freehand drilling: A controlled clinical trial, single arm with external control group10.1111/iej.14157 ↗
10. In vitro study on the accuracy of sleeveless guided endodontics and treatment of a complex upper lateral incisor10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104466 ↗
11. Clinical applications, accuracy and limitations of guided endodontics: A systematic review10.1111/iej.13216 ↗
12. Locating a Calcified Root Canal with Robotic Assistance: A Case Report10.1016/j.joen.2025.01.019 ↗
13. Endodontic Microsurgery With an Autonomous Robotic System: A Clinical Report10.1016/j.joen.2024.02.005 ↗
14. Contemporary Applications and Future Perspectives of Robots in Endodontics: A Scoping Review10.1002/rcs.70001 ↗
15. Dioguardi, M., Stellacci, C., La Femina, L., Spirito, F., Sovereto, D., Laneve, E., Manfredonia, M.F., D′Alessandro, A., Ballini, A., and Cantore, S. (2022). Comparison of Endodontic Failures between Nonsurgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. Medicina, 58.10.3390/medicina58070894 ↗
16. Maggiordomo, A., Farronato, M., Tartaglia, G., and Tarini, M. (2022). A method based on 3D affine alignment for the quantification of palatal expansion. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0278301 ↗
17. Apicoectomy of Perforated Root Canal Using Bioceramic Cement and Photodynamic Therapy
18. Microguided Endodontics: A case report of a maxillary lateral incisor with pulp canal obliteration and apical periodontitis10.1111/iej.13031 ↗
19. Tamayo-Estebaranz, N., Viñas, M.J., Arrieta-Blanco, P., Zubizarreta-Macho, Á., and Aragoneses-Lamas, J.M. (2024). Is Augmented Reality Technology Effective in Locating the Apex of Teeth Undergoing Apicoectomy Procedures?. J. Pers. Med., 14.10.3390/jpm14010073 ↗
20. Accuracy of augmented reality-assisted vs template-guided apicoectomy-an ex vivo comparative study
21. Approaches in apical microsurgery: Conventional vs. guided. A systematic review10.1007/s10006-025-01372-0 ↗
22. A new minimally invasive guided endodontic microsurgery by cone beam computed tomography and 3-dimensional printing technology10.5395/rde.2019.44.e29 ↗