journal article·2025-11-26Open access

In Vitro Effect of Sequential Compressive Loading and Thermocycling on Marginal Microleakage of Digitally Fabricated Overlay Restorations Made from Five Materials

Xavier Gutiérrez-Ruiz, Jordi Cano-Batalla, Òscar Figueras-Álvarez, Francisco Real-Voltas, Elena Núñez-Bielsa, Josep Cabratosa-Termes

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Marginal microleakage compromises the longevity and biological seal of indirect restorations. Despite the growing adoption of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, limited evidence compares the marginal integrity of these materials under combined mechanical and thermal stresses. This study evaluated and compared the marginal microleakage of overlay restorations fabricated from five contemporary restorative materials, IPS e.max® ZirCAD Prime, BioHPP®, G-CAM, VarseoSmile CrownPlus, and IPS e.max® CAD, after sequential compressive loading and thermocycling. A total of 125 extracted human molars were prepared for standardized 1.5 mm-thick CAD/CAM overlay restorations and assigned to three experimental conditions: control, sequential compressive loading (3 × 500 N), and thermocycling (6000 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C) followed by loading. Microleakage was assessed using 2% methylene blue dye and stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and Fleiss’ Kappa (α = 0.05). G-CAM and IPS e.max® ZirCAD Prime exhibited the lowest microleakage across all testing conditions, while BioHPP® showed the highest values. Both sequential compressive loadings and thermocycling significantly increased microleakage in all materials (p < 0.001). The results indicate that material type significantly influences marginal sealing, with G-CAM and IPS e.max® ZirCAD Prime maintaining superior marginal integrity compared with other materials tested.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Research and COVID-19

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain

Head of the Adult Integrated Dentistry Area, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain

Primary Care Dental Service, Catalan Health Institute (ICS), 08017 Barcelona, Spain

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Microleakage after thermocycling of cemented crowns—A meta-analysis10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.002 ↗
2. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: 12-year follow-up10.1007/s00784-015-1669-z ↗
3. Longevity of ceramic onlays: A systematic review10.1111/jerd.12384 ↗
4. Ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays have a high survival rate and a low rate of complications10.1016/j.adaj.2016.11.025 ↗
5. Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies10.1111/joor.12695 ↗
6. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.036 ↗
7. Survival of ceramic onlays placed with and without metal reinforcement10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.011 ↗
8. Ferracane, J.L. (1995). Materials in Dentistry. Principles and Applications, J.B. Lippincott Company.
9. Review of microleakage evaluation tools10.4103/jioh.jioh_160_17 ↗
10. Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage and Depth of Penetration of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants: An In Vitro Study10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1742 ↗
11. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.004 ↗
12. In vitro dentinal penetration by tracers used in microleakage studies10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00132.x ↗
13. No correlation between two methodological approaches applied to evaluate cervical margin relocation10.4012/dmj.2018-410 ↗
14. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.006 ↗
15. Grzebieluch, W., Kowalewski, P., Grygier, D., Rutkowska-Gorczyca, M., Kozakiewicz, M., and Jurczyszyn, K. (2021). Printable and machinable dental restorative composites for cad/cam application—Comparison of mechanical properties, fractographic, texture and fractal dimension analysis. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14174919 ↗
16. Influence of Fabrication Settings on the In Vitro Performance of Subtractively Manufactured Resin-Based Molar Crowns
17. Precision of fit and clinical evaluation of all-ceramic full restorations followed between 0·5 and 5 years10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01374.x ↗
18. Influence of finish-line geometry on the fit of crowns
19. Fracture load of 3D printed PEEK inlays compared with milled ones, direct resin composite fillings, and sound teeth10.1007/s00784-020-03216-5 ↗
20. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: A clinical report10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.026 ↗
21. PEEK and fiberglass intra-radicular posts: Influence of resin cement and mechanical cycling on push-out bond strength10.1007/s00784-022-04645-0 ↗
22. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication—FEA10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.007 ↗
23. Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method
24. Al Fodeh, R.S., Al-Johi, O.S., Alibrahim, A.N., Al-Dwairi, Z.N., Husain, N.A.-H., and Özcan, M. (2023). Fracture strength of endocrown maxillary restorations using different preparation designs and materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 148.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106184 ↗
25. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.022 ↗
26. The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior
27. Microleakage: The effect of storage and cycling duration10.1016/0022-3913(87)90339-8 ↗
28. In vitro microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins of class II cavities of primary molars restored with a bulk-fill and a conventional composite10.1002/cre2.729 ↗
29. Accuracy of the intaglio surface of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic crowns, veneers and table-tops: An in vitro study10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104960 ↗
30. Fatigue Resistance and Microleakage of CAD/CAM Ceramic and Composite Molar Crowns10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00773.x ↗
31. Microleakage and penetration depth of different fissure sealant materials after cyclic thermo-mechanic and brushing simulation10.4012/dmj.2016-234 ↗
32. Microleakage and penetration capability of various pit and fissure sealants upon different sealant application techniques10.4317/jced.60577 ↗
33. A microleakage study of single-bottle adhesives applied to enamel and cementum and aged by both occlusal loading and thermocycling10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.010 ↗
34. Marginal Gap, Internal Fit, and Fracture Load of Leucite-Reinforced Ceramic Inlays Fabricated by CEREC inLab and Hot-Pressed Techniques10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x ↗
35. Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation10.1111/jerd.12949 ↗
36. Güleç, C., and Sarıkaya, I. (2022). The influence of aging on the fracture load of milled monolithic crowns. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02529-z ↗
37. Effects of thermal and mechanical cycling on the mechanical strength and surface properties of dental CAD-CAM restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.014 ↗
38. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.024 ↗
39. Nelson, S.J., and Ash, M.M. (2015). Wheeler’s Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion, Saunders.
40. Effect of Laser Etching Versus Self-Etching Adhesive and Conventional Acid-Etching Techniques on Shear Bond Strength, Microleakage and Penetration Depth of a Resin Based Pit and Fissure Sealant (An In Vitro Study)10.21608/edj.2023.214667.2579 ↗
41. Microleakage along the implant–abutment interface: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y ↗
42. Characterization of aqueous silver nitrate solutions for leakage tests10.1590/S1678-77572011000300014 ↗
43. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers--comparison with SEM quantitative analysis
44. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin10.4103/1305-7456.126230 ↗
45. Comparative evaluation of microleakage and penetration depth of ACP containing pit and fissure sealant and flowable composite—An in-vitro study10.4317/jced.61756 ↗
46. Improvement of the mechanical, tribological and antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements by fluorinated graphene10.1016/j.dental.2018.02.006 ↗
47. Monolithic Zirconia Partial Coverage Restorations: An In Vitro Mastication Simulation Study10.1111/jopr.13287 ↗
48. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I
49. Aging resistance, mechanical properties and translucency of different yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for monolithic dental crown applications10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.006 ↗
50. Probing the interfacial strength of novel multi-layer zirconias10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.008 ↗
51. To compare the microleakage among experimental adhesives containing nanoclay fillers after the storages of 24 hours and 6 months10.2174/1874210601105010052 ↗
52. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems
53. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars
54. Fatigue resistance of ultrathin CAD/CAM ceramic and nanoceramic composite occlusal veneers10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.006 ↗
55. Taha, A.I., and Hafez, M.E. (2023). An in vitro study measuring marginal gaps of inlay restorations fabricated from different CAD-CAM materials after thermocycling. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-03687-4 ↗
56. Trueness of crowns fabricated by using additively and subtractively manufactured resin-based CAD-CAM materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.10.012 ↗
57. Ge, Z., Yang, L., Xiao, F., Wu, Y., Yu, T., Chen, J., Lin, J., and Zhang, Y. (2018). Graphene Family Nanomaterials: Properties and Potential Applications in Dentistry. Int. J. Biomater., 2018.10.1155/2018/1539678 ↗
58. Graphene-Based Nanocomposites as Antibacterial, Antiviral and Antifungal Agents10.1002/adhm.202201523 ↗
59. Nagi, N., Fouda, A.M., and Bourauel, C. (2023). Comparative evaluation of internal fit and marginal gap of endocrowns using lithium disilicate and polyether ether ketone materials—An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-02857-8 ↗
60. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical performance of implant-supported overdentures retained by CAD-CAM bars10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0054 ↗
61. Role of Polyetheretherketone in Prosthodontics: A Literature Review