journal article·2025-11-26Open access

A Prognostic Theory of Treatment Response for Major Depressive Disorder: A Dynamic Systems Framework for Forecasting Clinical Trajectories

Harold Ngabo-Woods, Larisa Dunai, Isabel Seguí Verdú

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

The clinical management of major depressive disorder remains hampered by a trial-and-error approach to treatment selection, a challenge that current diagnostic and static predictive models have failed to address. While artificial intelligence (AI) applications have focused on classifying a patient’s present state, they lack the ability to forecast the trajectory of their future response. This study addresses this critical gap by proposing a new theoretical framework that conceptualises depression treatment response as a complex dynamic system. Drawing a powerful analogy from the engineering field of structural health monitoring and damage prognosis, which forecasts the remaining useful life of a system, we shift the paradigm from diagnosis to prognosis. We introduce three core constructs: the Patient State Vector (PSV), a multimodal baseline of a patient’s clinical, biological, and digital phenotype; the Therapeutic Impulse Function (TIF), a formal representation of a treatment’s properties; and the Predicted Recovery Trajectory (PRT), the forecasted path of symptom severity over time. The central thesis of the framework is that a patient’s PRT emerges from the dynamic interaction between their initial PSV and a given TIF. We present a series of testable propositions, such as how early fluctuations in PRT can classify patients into distinct “dynamic phenotypes” predictive of long-term outcomes. By integrating mechanisms across neurobiology, behaviour, and pharmacology within an SHM-inspired framework, this prognostic theory aims to provide a new systems-based paradigm for personalised psychiatry, moving beyond static prediction to a mechanistic understanding of recovery. This cross-disciplinary adaptation illustrates how SHM-derived principles of state assessment, load modelling, and prognosis can inform new frontiers in predictive health modelling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mental Health Research Topics · Treatment of Major Depression · Digital Mental Health Interventions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Department Graphical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Exploring the incidence of inadequate response to antidepressants in the primary care of depression10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.04.005 ↗
2. The drugs don’t work? Antidepressants and the current and future pharmacological management of depression10.1177/2045125312445469 ↗
3. Treatment-resistant depression: Therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions10.2147/PPA.S29716 ↗
4. Zelek-Molik, A., and Litwa, E. (2025). Trends in research on novel antidepressant treatments. Front. Pharmacol., 16.10.3389/fphar.2025.1544795 ↗
5. Management of treatment-resistant depression: Challenges and opportunities10.2147/NDT.S198774 ↗
6. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR* D report10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905 ↗
7. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR* D: Implications for clinical practice10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28 ↗
8. The impact of treatment-resistant depression on health care utilization and costs10.4088/JCP.v63n1102 ↗
9. The increasing burden of depression10.2147/NDT.S19617 ↗
10. Ozomaro, U., Wahlestedt, C., and Nemeroff, C.B. (2013). Personalized medicine in psychiatry: Problems and promises. BMC Med., 11.10.1186/1741-7015-11-132 ↗
11. Global trends of machine learning applications in psychiatric research over 30 years: A bibliometric analysis10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102986 ↗
12. Iyortsuun, N.K., Kim, S., Jhon, M., Yang, H., and Pant, S. (2023). A review of machine learning and deep learning approaches on mental health diagnosis. Healthcare, 11.10.3390/healthcare11030285 ↗
13. Practical AI application in psychiatry: Historical review and future directions10.1038/s41380-025-03072-3 ↗
14. Machine learning in mental health: A scoping review of methods and applications10.1017/S0033291719000151 ↗
15. Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review10.1162/netn_a_00233 ↗
16. Li, H., Song, S., Wang, D., Zhang, D., Tan, Z., Lian, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, X., Pan, C., and Wu, Y. (2022). Treatment response prediction for major depressive disorder patients via multivariate pattern analysis of thalamic features. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 16.10.3389/fncom.2022.837093 ↗
17. Ntam, V.A., Huebner, T., Steffens, M., and Scholl, C. (2025). Machine learning approaches in the therapeutic outcome prediction in major depressive disorder: A systematic review. Front. Psychiatry, 16.10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1588963 ↗
18. Machine learning in the prediction of treatment response for emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102593 ↗
19. Ai-assisted prediction of differential response to antidepressant classes using electronic health records10.1038/s41746-023-00817-8 ↗
20. Machine learning in the prediction of depression treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1017/S0033291721003871 ↗
21. Using machine learning to predict antidepressant treatment outcome from electronic health records10.1176/appi.prcp.20220015 ↗
22. Charting the landscape of computational psychiatry
23. A dynamical systems view of psychiatric disorders—Theory10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0215 ↗
24. Gauld, C., and Depannemaecker, D. (2023). Dynamical systems in computational psychiatry: A toy-model to apprehend the dynamics of psychiatric symptoms. Front. Psychol., 14.10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1099257 ↗
25. A dynamical systems framework for precision psychiatry10.1038/s41746-025-01984-6 ↗
26. Embracing complexity in psychiatry—From reductionistic to systems approaches10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00334-1 ↗
27. Voerman, S.A., Strijbos, D., Staring, A.B.P., Boer, F.d., Dijk, M.v., Driessen, J., Glas, G., Goekoop, R., Mulder, A., and Tromp, N. (2025). Problem-sustaining patterns: Redesigning the concept of mental disorder. Front. Psychiatry, 16.10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1382915 ↗
28. Computational nosology and precision psychiatry10.1162/cpsy_a_00001 ↗
29. Moving from static to dynamic models of the onset of mental disorder10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0001 ↗
30. The potential of personalized post-traumatic stress disorder networks10.5152/pcp.2025.251059 ↗
31. Damage prognosis: The future of structural health monitoring10.1098/rsta.2006.1927 ↗
32. An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures10.1177/1475921704041866 ↗
33. Psychiatric illnesses as disorders of network dynamics
34. Hayes, A.M., and Andrews, L.A. (2020). A complex systems approach to the study of change in psychotherapy. BMC Med., 18.10.1186/s12916-020-01662-2 ↗
35. Digital phenotyping: An overarching framework to capture our extended mental states10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30054-3 ↗
36. New dimensions and new tools to realize the potential of rdoc: Digital phenotyping via smartphones and connected devices10.1038/tp.2017.25 ↗
37. AGNP consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry: Update 201110.1055/s-0031-1286287 ↗
38. Applications of machine learning algorithms to predict antidepressant treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.073 ↗
39. Predicting treatment outcome in depression: An introduction into current concepts and challenges10.1007/s00406-022-01418-4 ↗
40. Uyar, A., and Gönül, A.S. (2025). New and emerging pharmacologic treatments for mdd. Front. Psychiatry, 16.10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1621887 ↗
41. Longitudinal clusters of long-term trajectories in patients with early-onset chronic depression: 2 years of naturalistic follow-up after extensive psychological treatment10.1159/000535005 ↗
42. Predicting individual clinical trajectories of depression with generative embedding10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102213 ↗
43. Lai, W., Liao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhao, H., Li, Y., Chen, R., Shi, G., Liu, Y., Hao, J., and Li, Z. (2025). The trajectory of depressive symptoms and the association with quality of life and suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 25.10.1186/s12888-025-06743-1 ↗
44. Predicting the naturalistic course of major depressive disorder using clinical and multimodal neuroimaging information: A multivariate pattern recognition study10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.11.018 ↗
45. The 52-symptom challenge: The measurement of depression
46. Kang, S., and Cho, S. (2020). Neuroimaging biomarkers for predicting treatment response and recurrence of major depressive disorder. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21062148 ↗
47. Predicting antidepressant response via local-global graph neural network and neuroimaging biomarkers10.1038/s41746-025-01912-8 ↗
48. An overview of the heterogeneity of major depressive disorder: Current knowledge and future prospective10.2174/1570159X17666191001142934 ↗
49. The heterogeneity of depression10.1176/appi.ajp.20230574 ↗
50. Predicting neuroimaging biomarkers for antidepressant selection in early treatment of depression10.1002/jmri.27577 ↗
51. Explainable artificial intelligence for mental health through transparency and interpretability for understandability10.1038/s41746-023-00751-9 ↗
52. Probierz, B., Straś, A., Rodek, P., and Kozak, J. (2025). Explainable ai in psychiatry. Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development, Routledge.10.4324/9781003599227-17 ↗
53. Evaluating the impact of machine learning models on adult major depressive disorder using conventional treatment strategies: A systematic review approach10.1186/s12982-025-00816-y ↗
54. Cai, H., Song, H., Yang, Y., Xiao, Z., Zhang, X., Jiang, F., Liu, H., and Tang, Y. (2024). Big-five personality traits and depression: Chain mediation of self-efficacy and walking. Front. Psychiatry, 15.10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1460888 ↗
55. Chen, J., and Huang, H. (2024). The influence of big five personality traits on depression and suicidal behavior. The Association Between Depression and Suicidal Behavior, InTechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.1006564 ↗
56. What constitutes a theoretical contribution?10.2307/258554 ↗
57. Five-factor personality and antidepressant response to intermittent theta burst stimulation for major depressive disorder10.1016/j.transm.2025.100196 ↗
58. Designing human-centered AI for mental health: Developing clinically relevant applications for online CBT treatment
59. Behavior as physiology: How dynamical-systems theory could advance psychiatry10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20081151 ↗
60. Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: A multisite, pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30162-7 ↗
61. Alowais, S.A., Alghamdi, S.S., Alsuhebany, N., Alqahtani, T., Alshaya, A.I., and Almoaiqel, M. (2023). Revolutionizing healthcare: The role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ., 23.10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z ↗
62. Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness10.1186/s40345-017-0073-9 ↗
63. Ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in health care: A comprehensive review
64. Ratti, E., Morrison, M., and Jakab, I. (2025). Ethical and social considerations of applying artificial intelligence in healthcare—A two-pronged scoping review. BMC Med Ethics, 26.10.1186/s12910-025-01198-1 ↗
65. World Health Organization (2024, August 13). WHO Calls for Safe and Ethical AI for Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-05-2023-who-calls-for-safe-and-ethical-ai-for-health.