journal article·2025-11-21Open access

Comparison of Point Measurement Strategies and Mathematical Algorithms for Evaluation in Contact Measurement of a Spherical Surface on a CMM

Ján Buša, Miroslav Dovica, Teodor Tóth

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

This paper compares different point measurement strategies for spherical surfaces using a coordinate measuring machine. A total of 77 points were measured using the Sphere, Touch Point, Space Point, and Mid Point strategies, and approximately 2200 points were measured by scanning the surface with eight circles. Three probe configurations with different probe tip diameters were used for the measurements. The acquired data were processed with Calypso software, and the results for sphere diameters and centers were verified using the LSQ algorithms with the Kåsa and Newton methods, as well as Chebyshev fitting. Spherical shell half-widths and Root Mean Square Errors were used to evaluate accuracy. The results show that the sensor with rprobe=2.500557 mm provides the smallest deviation from the certified value for both diameter and center position. The deviations remain smaller than the maximum permissible error of length measurement E0,MPE. The scanning strategy does not consistently provide better results for either the diameter or the sphere center compared to point measurement. The results of the LSQ method in Calypso correspond to those obtained by the Kåsa/Newton methods (with results identical at the μm scales), while the Calypso Minimum Feature evaluation method corresponds to the Chebyshev fit.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Meshcheryakov Laboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie st, 6, 141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Institute of Special Engineering Processes, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Letná, 9, 04001 Košice, Slovakia

Funding

Development, optimization, and application of coordinate measurement strategies of geometric parameters and structure of additive products · Innovative methods of implementing students’ digital skills in length metrology

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Varga, J., Tóth, T., Frankovský, P., Dulebová, Ľ., Spišák, E., Zajačko, I., and Živčák, J. (2021). The Influence of Automated Machining Strategy on Geometric Deviations of Machined Surfaces. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052353 ↗
2. New developments in coordinate measuring machines for manufacturing industries10.1051/ijmqe/2014001 ↗
3. Boeckmans, B., Vlaeyen, M., Probst, G., Dewulf, W., Haitjema, H., and Kruth, J.-P. (2019, January 9–12). CMM tactile probe performance evaluation according to ISO/DIS 10360-5:2018. Proceedings of the Laser Metrology and Machine Performance XIII—13th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance (LAM|DAMAP 2019), Aachen, Germany. Available online: https://www.euspen.eu/knowledge-base/LAM19121.pdf.
4. Flack, D. (2011). Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 42. CMM Verification, National Physical Laboratory. Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. Available online: https://eprintspublications.npl.co.uk/2045/1/mgpg42.pdf.
5. Surface normal estimation of freeform surface using efficient neighborhood selection method in point cloud data10.1088/0957-0233/24/9/095001 ↗
6. Surface form inspection with contact coordinate measurement: A review10.1088/2631-7990/acc76e ↗
7. Probing Systems in Dimensional Metrology10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60034-1 ↗
8. Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH (2014). Influences on Measuring Results, EN_60_023_014I, Printed in Germany, CZ-II/2014, Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH.
9. Touch Probe Measurement in Dimensional Metrology: A Review10.15282/ijame.18.2.2021.02.0658 ↗
10. (2025, July 23). Renishaw User Guide: Precision Styli, Part Number: H-1000-3304. Available online: https://www.renishaw.com/resourcecentre/en/details/--130708?lang=en.
11. (2025, July 23). What Is a CMM Stylus?. Available online: https://hexagon.com/resources/resource-library/what-is-a-cmm-stylus.
12. (2025, July 23). Zeiss Metrology Shop. Available online: https://shop.metrology.zeiss.co.uk/.
13. Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., and Jurczyk, M. (2018). Cylindricity Measurement on a Coordinate Measuring Machine. Advances in Manufacturing, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6 ↗
14. An investigation of the mechanical filtering effect of tactile CMM in the measurement of additively manufactured parts10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.066 ↗
15. A review on methods for probe performance verification10.1016/S0263-2241(98)00006-2 ↗
16. Dynamic error characteristics of touch trigger probes fitted to coordinate measuring machines10.1109/19.746577 ↗
17. Probing System Characteristics in Coordinate Metrology10.2478/v10048-010-0023-5 ↗
18. Influence of Measured Objects Parameters on CMM Touch Trigger Probe Accuracy of Probing10.1016/j.precisioneng.2004.11.009 ↗
19. Flack, D. (2014). Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 41. CMM Measurement Strategies, National Physical Laboratory. Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO. Available online: https://www.npl.co.uk/resources/gpgs/cmm-measurement-strategies.
20. (2019). ZEISS Measuring Strategies Cookbook—English Edition, Carl Zeiss Industrial Metrology. [11th ed.].
21. Measurement point layout strategy of free-form surface based on gridding using coordinate measuring machine10.1051/ijmqe/2023008 ↗
22. Comparing the probing systems of coordinate measurement machine: Scanning probe versus touch-trigger probe10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107604 ↗
23. The errors occurring in the CMM fitting method
24. The influence of fitting algorithm and scanning speed on roundness error for 50 mm standard ring measurement using CMM
25. A Comparative Experimental Study of an Alternative CMM Error Model under Least-Squares and Minimum Zone Fittings for Industrial Measuring10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.560 ↗
26. Calypso Networks Association (2016). Calypso Basics—Operating Instructions, Zeiss. Version 2016.
27. Verification of Coordinate Measuring Machine Using a Gauge Block10.2478/msr-2024-0030 ↗
28. Mazur, T., Szymanski, T., Samociuk, W., Rucki, M., and Ryba, T. (2025). The Impact of Probe Angle and Swivel Length on Contact Point Identification in Coordinate Measuring Machine Measurements: A Case Study. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25072008 ↗
29. Diering, M., Wieczorowski, M., Harugade, M., and Pereira, A. (2022). Analysis of the Direction-Dependent Point Identification Accuracy in CMM Measurement. Advances in Manufacturing III. MANUFACTURING 2022, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-031-03925-6 ↗
30. Mazur, T., Cepova, L., Szymanski, T., and Rucki, M. (2022). Analysis of the Planar Point Identification Accuracy in CMM Measurements. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22187005 ↗
31. (2025, September 24). Intro to Coordinate Metrology. Available online: https://hexagon.com/resources/resource-library/intro-coordinate-metrology.
32. Influence of point cloud filtering on optical inspection of additive manufactured metal parts10.1016/j.precisioneng.2024.07.014 ↗
33. Mohaghegh, K., Roncevic, V., Andreasen, J.L., and De Chiffre, L. (2020, January 11–15). Investigation on the effect of filtering and plane creation on differences between XCT and CMM measurements on a miniature step gauge. Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Göteborg, Sweden.
34. Recent advances in separation of roughness, waviness and form10.1016/S0141-6359(02)00103-4 ↗
35. Applications of profile filtering in the dimensional metrology of fuel cell plates10.1088/0957-0233/24/6/065003 ↗
36. (2009). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Part 2: CMMs Used for Measuring Linear Dimensions (Standard No. ISO 10360-2:2009).
37. (2014). Carl Zeiss Contura G2 Specification, Version: October 2016, EN_60_022_335II Printed in Germany MAC-CZ-I/2014 Uoo, Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH. Available online: https://5.imimg.com/data5/SELLER/Doc/2020/10/IO/QE/OS/50240193/7-zeiss-contura-g2-coordinate-measuring-machine.pdf.
38. Delonge, P. (1972, January 10–13). Computer optimization of Deschamps’ method and error cancellation in reflectometry. Proceedings of the IMEKO Symposium on Microwave Measurement, Budapest, Hungary.
39. A circle fitting procedure and its error analysis
40. Chernov, N. (2010). Circular and Linear Regression: Fitting Circles and Lines by Least Squares, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, A CHAPMAN & HALL BOOK. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20130512154618id_/http://people.cas.uab.edu:80/~mosya/cl/book.pdf.10.1201/EBK1439835906 ↗
41. Chebyshev fitting of complex surfaces for precision metrology10.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.017 ↗
42. A finite algorithm to fit geometrically all midrange lines, circles, planes, spheres, hyperplanes, and hyperspheres10.1007/s002110100326 ↗
43. Eaton, J.W., Bateman, D., Hauberg, S., and Wehbring, R. (2025, November 06). GNU Octave Version 10.3.0 Manual: A High-Level Interactive Language for Numerical Computations. Available online: https://octave.org/doc/v10.3.0/.
44. (2025, April 10). Matlab, Available online: https://ch.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html.
45. Least-Squares Fitting Algorithms of the NIST Algorithm Testing System10.6028/jres.103.043 ↗
46. Least-squares fitting of circles and ellipses10.1007/BF01934268 ↗
47. Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces10.1145/37402.37420 ↗