journal article·2025-11-16Open access

Urban Spatial Structure and Vehicle Miles Traveled in 461 U.S. Cities

Youngmo Yoon, Heejun Chang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of socioeconomic characteristics, density, built environment, and urban spatial structure on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) across 461 urbanized areas in the United States. Using multiple regression models, we compare the explanatory power of conventional variables with those representing the spatial distribution of major urban elements, such as population, employment, land use, and travel demand to city centers. The results show that population-weighted distance to the city center and the contiguity of high-intensity land use significantly influence vehicle travel, with greater distances from city centers and more fragmented land use leading to higher VMT. Models incorporating urban spatial structure variables exhibit improved explanatory power and better fit than those including only socioeconomic, density, and built environment variables. These findings demonstrate that urban spatial structure captures key aspects of vehicle travel behavior that are overlooked by traditional measures. Policy implications include the promotion of compact, mixed-use development, infill and brownfield redevelopment, and urban growth boundaries to reduce vehicle dependence. The study highlights the importance of spatial planning in managing urban travel demand and offers a refined analytical framework for examining the interplay between urban form and mobility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Transportation and Mobility Innovations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Sejong-si 30147, Republic of Korea

School of Earth, Environment, and Society, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. EPA (2025, November 02). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2022. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 430-R-24-004, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-1990-2022.
2. Planning for climate change
3. Effects of Built Environments on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Evidence from 370 US Urbanized Areas10.1068/a4236 ↗
4. Gasoline Consumption and Cities10.1080/01944368908975398 ↗
5. The greenness of cities: Carbon dioxide emissions and urban development10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.006 ↗
6. Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge10.1073/pnas.1315545112 ↗
7. Understanding the relationship between energy consumption and urban form10.30958/ajs.4-2-3 ↗
8. Density and the Journey to Work10.1111/j.1468-2257.1997.tb00768.x ↗
9. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.002 ↗
10. Residential density and transportation emissions: Examining the connection by addressing spatial autocorrelation and self-selection10.1016/j.trd.2013.03.006 ↗
11. Travel Demand and The 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6 ↗
12. The Effects of Urban Spatial Structure On Travel Demand In The United States10.1162/0034653054638292 ↗
13. Testing Newman and Kenworthy’s Theory of Density and Automobile Dependence10.1177/0739456X16688767 ↗
14. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels10.1016/j.trb.2005.12.005 ↗
15. The carbon ‘carprint’ of urbanization: New evidence from French cities10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2021.103693 ↗
16. Webber, M. (1964). An approach to metropolitan spatial structure. Explorations into Urban Structure, University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9781512808063 ↗
17. Haggett, P. (1965). Location Analysis in Human Geography, Edward Arnold.
18. Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior10.2307/143224 ↗
19. Urban Spatial Structure
20. Heterogeneous development of metropolitan spatial structure: Evidence from commuting patterns in English and Welsh city-regions, 1981–200110.1016/j.cities.2010.11.006 ↗
21. Zhong, C., Huang, X., Arisona, S.M., and Schmitt, G. (2013, January 5–8). Identifying Spatial Structure of Urban Functional Centers Using Travel Survey Data: A Case Study of Singapore. Proceedings of the SIGSPATIAL’13: 21st SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Orlando, FL, USA.
22. The Regional Economy, Spatial Structure and Regional Urban Systems10.1080/00343404.2013.799759 ↗
23. Urban spatial structure: An interaction between employment and built-up volumes
24. Identifying urban spatial structure and urban vibrancy in highly dense cities using georeferenced social media data10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102005 ↗
25. Rodrigue, J.P. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems, Routledge. [5th ed.].10.4324/9780429346323 ↗
26. Li, Q., Chen, X., Jiao, S., Song, W., Zong, W., and Niu, Y. (2022). Can Mixed Land Use Reduce CO2 Emissions? A Case Study of 268 Chinese Cities. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142215117 ↗
27. Energy Scarcity and Urban Development Patterns10.1177/016001768000500201 ↗
28. Energy efficiency and equity of various urban land use patterns10.1016/0304-4009(82)90002-X ↗
29. Herman, S. (1984). Technology Assessment of Productive Conservation in Urban Transportation, Transportation Research Borad.
30. A time-series analysis of the relationship between urban layout and automobile reliance: Have cities shifted to integration of land use and transport?
31. Hitchcock, J. (1994). A Primer on the Use of Density in Land Use Planning, University of Toronto.
32. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis10.3141/1780-10 ↗
33. Bertaud, A. (2023, May 11). The Spatial Organization of Cities: Deliberate Outcome or Unforeseen Consequence? UC Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5vb4w9wb.
34. Ewing, R. (2008). Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review. Urban Ecology: An International Perspective on the Interaction Between Humans and Nature, Springer.
35. Travel and the Built Environment10.1080/01944361003766766 ↗
36. Urban form and spatial structure as determinants of the ecological footprint of commuting10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.006 ↗
37. Car use, commuting and urban form in a rapidly growing city: Evidence from Beijing10.1080/03081060.2011.600049 ↗
38. Handy, S., Cao, X., and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2023, May 29). Correlation or Causality Between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior? Evidence from Northern California. UC Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5b76c5kg.
39. Ewing, R., Greenwald, M.J., Zhang, M., Walters, J., Feldman, M., Cervero, R., and Thomas, J. (2009). Measuring the Impact of Urban Form and Transit Access on Mixed Use SITE Trip Generation Rates-Portland Pilot Study, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
40. Relationship between urban form and CO2 emissions: Evidence from fifty Japanese cities10.1016/j.uclim.2012.10.006 ↗
41. Feng, Q., and Gauthier, P. (2021). Untangling Urban Sprawl and Climate Change: A Review of the Literature on Physical Planning and Transportation Drivers. Atmosphere, 12.10.3390/atmos12050547 ↗
42. Measuring Sprawl and Its Impacts: An Update10.1177/0739456X14565247 ↗
43. Model selection for ecologists: The worldviews of AIC and BIC10.1890/13-1452.1 ↗
44. Downtown population growth and commuting trips: Recent experience in Toronto10.1080/01944369108975485 ↗
45. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2023, July 05). Highway Statistics 2020, Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2020/.
46. U.S. Census Bureau (2023, April 22). American Community Survey: 2016–2020 5-Year Estimates, Available online: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2021/acs-5-year.html.
47. U.S. Census Bureau (2023, May 09). LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics Data (2002–2020), Available online: https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/#lodes.LODES8.0.
48. (2023, July 11). Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transit Map, Available online: https://www.bts.gov/national-transit-map.
49. (2023, May 03). United States Geological Survey. National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2019 Products, Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/data/national-land-cover-database-nlcd-2021-products.
50. American Automobile Association (2023, July 05). State Gas Price Averages (in 5th July). Available online: https://gasprices.aaa.com/state-gas-price-averages/.
51. Polycentricity and the evolution of metropolitan spatial structure10.1111/grow.12599 ↗
52. Subcenters in the Los Angeles region10.1016/0166-0462(91)90032-I ↗
53. Nonparametric employment subcenter identification10.1006/juec.2001.2228 ↗
54. Small, K., and Song, S. (1994). Population and Employment Densities: Structure and Change, University of California Transportation Center.10.1006/juec.1994.1037 ↗
55. Urban population densities
56. Factors influencing trip generation on metro system in Madrid (Spain)10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.021 ↗
57. Comparative analysis of trip generation models: Results using home-based work trips in the Seoul metropolitan area10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000011 ↗
58. Trip generation and attraction model and forecasting using machine learning methods10.1088/1757-899X/1087/1/012021 ↗
59. Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426 ↗
60. Relationship between urban spatial structure and carbon emissions: A literature review10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109456 ↗
61. Ottensmann, J.R. (2018). On Population-Weighted Density. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.3119965 ↗
62. Urban mobility and urban form: The social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00254-3 ↗
63. Jacobs, A. (1995). Great Streets, MIT Press.
64. Trip generation, trip chains and polycentric development in metropolitan USA: A Case Study of the Wasatch Front Region, Utah10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102488 ↗
65. Barnes, G. (2001). Population and Employment Density and Travel Behavior in Large U.S. Cities, Minnesota Department of Transportation.
66. Self-Selection in Home Choice: Use of Treatment Effects in Evaluating Relationship Between Built Environment and Travel Behavior10.3141/2077-08 ↗
67. Handy, S.L., Tal, G., Circella, G., and Boarnet, M.G. (2014). Brief: Impacts of Network Connectivity on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
68. Is There a Role for Physical Planners?10.1080/01944369208975814 ↗