journal article·2025-11-15Open access

Investigating Factors Affecting Request Matching in Demand-Responsive Transit Service with Different Fleet Sizes Using a Decision Tree Model

Sanjay Tandan, Alain Morris Anthony, Hyun Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

Demand-responsive transit (DRT) is a flexible transportation service that adapts routes and schedules based on real-time passenger needs, offering greater convenience than traditional fixed-route systems. DRT systems are highly dynamic and complex. Customer requests are often rejected due to operational constraints. Therefore, it is essential to identify and rank the factors that determine request acceptance or rejection. This study develops a Decision Tree Model (DTM) for vehicle dispatching in DRT, using the Korea National University of Transportation (KNUT) Chungju Campus as the study area. Elecle bicycle origin–destination (OD) data were first used to simulate DRT operations, and the resulting outputs were employed to train the DTM to classify passenger requests as “assign” or “reject.” The model considers key factors such as vehicle capacity, access time, Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA), waiting time, detour factor, and egress time. Based on 5-fold cross-validation, the detour factor was identified as the most influential variable across all fleet configurations, with mean importance values of 0.582 ± 0.055, 0.550 ± 0.047, and 0.447 ± 0.073 for the 1-, 2-, and 3-vehicle scenarios, respectively. The model achieved accuracies of 0.73 ± 0.02, 0.82 ± 0.04, and 0.83 ± 0.07, indicating improved performance with increasing fleet size. Error analysis revealed conservative behavior for one vehicle, balanced performance for two, and liberal over-assignment for three vehicles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Urban and Freight Transport Logistics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Transportation & ICT Convergence Research Center, Korea National University of Transportation (KNUT), 50 Deahak-ro, Chungju-si 27469, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Ambrosino, G., Volo, N.D., Ferilli, G., and Finn, B. (2004, January 23–26). Mobility Services Accessibility: Demand Responsive Transport Service towards the Flexible Mobility Agency. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobility and Transport for Elderly and Disabled People, Hamamatsu, Japan.
2. Flexible Route Optimization for Demand-Responsive Public Transit Service10.1061/JTEPBS.0000448 ↗
3. The Impact of the Mobile Application on Off-Line Market: Case in Call Taxi and Kakao Taxi
4. A study on user experience of Kakao Taxi
5. Risk Perception and Intention to Discontinue Use of Ride-Hailing Services in China: Taking the Example of DiDi Chuxing10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.021 ↗
6. How Grab Becomes One of the Greatest Start-Ups in South-East Asia10.32535/ijthap.v4i1.1023 ↗
7. The Actual Demand behind Demand-Responsive Transport: Assessing Behavioral Intention to Use DRT Systems in Two Rural Areas in Germany10.1016/j.cstp.2020.04.011 ↗
8. Demand-Responsive Transport for Students in Rural Areas: A Case Study in Vulkaneifel, Germany10.1016/j.tra.2023.103837 ↗
9. The Evaluation of Demand Responsive Transport Services in Europe10.1016/S0966-6923(03)00026-7 ↗
10. The Role of DRT in European Urban Public Transport Systems—A Comparison between Tampere, Braunschweig and Genoa10.3390/futuretransp3020034 ↗
11. A Survey of Machine Learning-Based Ride-Hailing Planning10.1109/TITS.2023.3345174 ↗
12. An Enhanced Ride Sharing Model Based on Human Characteristics and Machine Learning Recommender System10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.135 ↗
13. Do, M., Byun, W., Shin, D.K., and Jin, H. (2019). Factors Influencing Matching of Ride-Hailing Service Using Machine Learning Method. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11205615 ↗
14. Short-Term Prediction of Demand for Ride-Hailing Services: A Deep Learning Approach10.1007/s42421-021-00041-4 ↗
15. How Machine Learning Informs Ride-Hailing Services: A Survey10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100075 ↗
16. Saadi, I., Wong, M., Farooq, B., Teller, J., and Cools, M. (2017). An Investigation into Machine Learning Approaches for Forecasting Spatio-Temporal Demand in Ride-Hailing Service. arXiv.
17. Integrated Design Framework for On-Demand Transit System Based on Spatiotemporal Mobility Patterns10.1016/j.trc.2023.104087 ↗
18. A Simulation-Optimization Model for Analyzing a Demand Responsive Transit System for Last-Mile Transportation: A Case Study in São Paulo, Brazil10.1016/j.cstp.2021.06.019 ↗
19. Demand-Responsive Transit Systems in Areas with Low Transport Demand of “Smart City”10.1016/j.trpro.2020.10.020 ↗
20. Assessing the Impact of Different Policy Decisions on the Resource Requirements of a Demand Responsive Transport System for Persons with Disabilities10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.011 ↗
21. Lee, S., Farmer, D., Kim, J., and Kim, H. (2022). Shared Autonomous Vehicles Competing with Shared Electric Bicycles: A Stated-Preference Analysis. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142114319 ↗
22. Decision of Demand-Responsive Transit Virtual Stops Using Shared Bicycle Data10.5392/JKCA.2024.24.12.037 ↗
23. An Introduction to Decision Tree Modeling10.1002/cem.873 ↗
24. How Public Shared Bike Can Assist First and Last Mile Accessibility: A Case Study of the MRT System in Taipei City, Taiwan10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103569 ↗
25. Preferences for First and Last Mile Shared Mobility between Stops and Activity Locations: A Case Study of Local Public Transport Users in Utrecht, the Netherlands10.1016/j.tra.2022.10.008 ↗
26. A Heuristic Algorithm for the Multi-Vehicle Advance Request Dial-a-Ride Problem with Time Windows10.1016/0191-2615(86)90020-2 ↗
27. The Dial-a-Ride Problem: Models and Algorithms10.1007/s10479-007-0170-8 ↗
28. A New Regret Insertion Heuristic for Solving Large-Scale Dial-a-Ride Problems with Time Windows10.1016/j.trb.2003.07.001 ↗
29. Combining Reinforcement Learning with Genetic Algorithm for Many-To-Many Route Optimization of Autonomous Vehicles10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3366517 ↗
30. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
31. Decision Trees10.1002/wics.1278 ↗
32. Liu, H., Cocea, M., and Ding, W. (2017, January 9–12). Decision Tree Learning Based Feature Evaluation and Selection for Image Classification. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), Ningbo, China.10.1109/ICMLC.2017.8108975 ↗
33. Predicting Susceptibility to Use Demand Responsive Transport Using Demographic and Trip Characteristics of the Population10.1016/j.tbs.2016.06.001 ↗
34. Peng, W., Chen, J., and Zhou, H. (2025, May 05). An Implementation of ID3—Decision Tree Learning Algorithm. Available online: https://rhuang.cis.k.hosei.ac.jp/Miccl/AI-2/DecisionTree2.pdf.
35. R-C4.5 Decision Tree Model and Its Applications to Health Care Dataset
36. Lewis, R.J. (2000, January 22–25). An Introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis. Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
37. CHAID Decision Tree: Methodological Frame and Application10.1515/ethemes-2016-0029 ↗
38. Regularized Impurity Reduction: Accurate Decision Trees with Complexity Guarantees10.1007/s10618-022-00884-7 ↗
39. Xu, K. (2003). How Has the Literature on Gini’s Index Evolved in the Past 80 Years?. SSRN Electron. J., 1–41.10.2139/ssrn.423200 ↗
40. Yacouby, R., and Axman, D. (2020). Probabilistic Extension of Precision, Recall, and F1 Score for More Thorough Evaluation of Classification Models. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems, Online, 20 November 2020, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2020.eval4nlp-1.9 ↗
41. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
42. Evaluation of Decision Tree Pruning Algorithms for Complexity and Classification Accuracy
43. Prediction Performance of Improved Decision Tree-Based Algorithms: A Review10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.011 ↗
44. A Research on User Preference Factor of DRT in Small and Medium-sized Cities Using Stated Preference Survey10.12815/kits.2024.23.5.117 ↗
45. Efficient Route Planning for Real-Time Demand-Responsive Transit
46. Kim, T.W., Chae, M., and Yu, J.W. (2025). Optimization and Implementation Framework for Connected Demand Responsive Transit (DRT) Considering Punctuality. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17031079 ↗