Research on the Possibilities of Reusing Mixed Reclaimed Asphalt Materials with a Focus on the Circular Economy
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents the results of a 10-year research study on the possibilities of implementing circular economy principles into the recovery of construction waste in road construction and paving traffic areas. According to Eurostat, construction waste accounts for approximately 25–30% of the total amount of waste produced in Europe. New legislative policies strongly support selective demolition and recycling with the aim of recycling at least 70% of construction waste. The subject of this research was mixed reclaimed asphalt material (MRAM) composed of 70% asphalt mixture, 10% aggregate, 10% concrete, and 10% soil. Isomorphic models and experimental sections made of MRAM showed that the required characteristics cannot be achieved when using MRAM without heating and compaction. When laying MRAM using a light dynamic plate and additional heating due to solar radiation, the LDD 100 device detected a 53% increase in the deformation modulus. On isomorphic MRAM models, the CBR test showed a 4-, 5-, and 14-times increase in the CBR value when the temperature was increased from 20 °C to 40, 50, and 70 °C. The laboratory results were confirmed by monitoring the surface condition of a local road rehabilitated between 2017 and 2025 using MRAM, where some sections showed the properties of semi-bound layers after eight years. The road surface was improved with a 20 cm layer of MRAM at an air temperature of 30 °C and compacted with a 10-ton smooth roller. The research results presented made it possible to create a proposal for a systematic approach to the evaluation of materials obtained from asphalt roads, optimized on the principles of the circular economy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 01001 Zilina, Slovakia
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future.
2. Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013 ↗
3. Mallick, R.B., and El-Korchi, T. (2018). Pavement Engineering: Principles and Practise, Taylor & Francis Group. [3rd ed.].10.1201/9781315119205 ↗
4. Kibert, C.J. (1994, January 6–9). Establishing principles and a model for sustainable construction. Proceedings of the First International Conference of CIB TG 16, Tampa, FL, USA.
5. Vanegas, J.A., and Pearce, A.R. (2000, January 20–22). Drivers for change: An organizational perspective on sustainable construction. Proceedings of the Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1061/40475(278)44 ↗
6. Pulaski, M.H. (2005). The Alignment of Sustainability and Constructability: A Continuous Value Enhancement Process. [Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University].
7. Ghosh, S.K., Ghosh, S.K., Mohapatra, B.G., and Mersky, R.L. (2021). Circular Economy in the Construction Industry, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781003217619 ↗
8. The role of global waste management and circular economy towards carbon neutrality10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.021 ↗
9. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)10.1093/yiel/yvae022 ↗
10. Prediction of greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste incinerators with consideration of utilization of heat and captured CO2 in the Tokyo waterfront area10.1007/s10163-023-01686-9 ↗
11. Transition towards eco-efficiency in municipal solid waste management to reduce GHG emissions: The case of Brazil10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121370 ↗
12. Bruyninckx, H., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hellweg, S., Schandl, H., Vidal, B., Razian, H., Nohl, R., Marcos-Martinez, R., West, J., and Lu, Y. (2025, November 03). Global Resources Outlook 2024: Bend the Trend. Pathways to a Liveable Planet as Resource Use Spikes, United Nations Environment Programme 2024. Available online: http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/44901.
13. Global carbon budget 202410.5194/essd-17-965-2025 ↗
14. 2024, A Landmark Year for Climate Change and Global Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage: Annual Progress Review10.1002/ese3.70091 ↗
15. Miller, T., and Bahia, H. (2009). Sustainable Asphalt Pavements Technologies, Knowledge Gaps and Opportunities, Modified Asphalt Research Center, University of Wisconsin Madison.
16. Global CO2 emissions from cement production10.5194/essd-10-195-2018 ↗
17. Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049 ↗
18. Chang, I., Lee, M., and Cho, G.C. (2019). Global CO2 emission-related geotechnical engineering hazards and the mission for sustainable geotechnical engineering. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12132567 ↗
19. López, L.C.S., Ramos, J.C.L., de la Rosa, Y.E.N., Bruschi, G.J., and Baldovino, J.D.J.A. (2025). Stabilization of Clay Soils Using a Lime Derived from Seashell. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18122723 ↗
20. da Silva, T.R., de Azevedo, A.R.G., Cecchin, D., Marvila, M.T., Amran, M., Fediuk, R., Vatin, N., Karelina, M., Klyuev, S., and Szelag, M. (2021). Application of plastic wastes in construction materials: A review using the concept of life-cycle assessment in the context of recent research for future perspectives. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14133549 ↗
21. Examining the critical factors that influence the success of construction and demolition waste reverse logistics operations10.2495/EI-V5-N3-236-248 ↗
22. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., and Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, World Bank Publications.10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0 ↗
23. Municipal solid waste management in China: Status, problems and challenges10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.012 ↗
24. Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities—A review10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.008 ↗
25. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061 ↗
26. Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.010 ↗
27. Life-cycle assessment of pavements Part II: Filling the research gaps10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.009 ↗
28. A critical review of the life cycle assessment studies on road pavements and road infrastructures10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117697 ↗
29. Life cycle assessment of road construction alternative materials: A literature review10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.003 ↗
30. Environmental assessment of asphalt mixtures modified with polymer coated rubber from scrap tires10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138090 ↗
31. Evaluation of the steel slag incorporation as coarse aggregate for road construction: Technical requirements and environmental impact assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.094 ↗
32. Life cycle assessment of natural and mixed recycled aggregate production in Brazil10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.068 ↗
33. Eco-friendly design of Warm mix asphalt (WMA) with recycled concrete aggregate (RCA): A case study from a developing country10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126890 ↗
34. Komačka, J., Remišová, E., and Schlosser, F. (2025, July 03). Asphalt mixtures using reclaimed asphalt containing polymer modified binder. Deliverable Nr 4.1 Report of RECYPMA Project initiated by ERA-NET ROAD. Available online: https://www.cedr.eu/download/other_public_files/research_programme/eranet_road/call_2011/design/recympma/RECYPMA-D-4-1-final-version.pdf.
35. Enhancing waste asphalt durability through cold recycling and additive integration10.1186/s42252-024-00061-7 ↗
36. Research on Macro and Micro Performance Degradation of Hot In-Place Recycled Asphalt Mixtures with High RAP Contents
37. (2025, September 19). Circular Economy: Definition, Importance and Benefits. The Circular Economy: Find Out What It Means, How It Benefits You, the Environment and Our Economy. Published: 24-05-2023. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits.
38. (2025, September 19). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Waste_statistics,29.9.2025.
39. Madajova, Z., Belicova, P., and Males, I. (2025, July 03). Circular Economy in Slovakia. Institute of Circular Economy, oz, pp. 17. (In Slovak).
40. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 ↗
41. OECD (2016). Farm Management Practices to Foster Green Growth.
42. Towards the circular economy
43. Ernst & Young (2015). Are You Ready for the Circular Economy? The Necessity of an Integrated Approach, EY.
44. Green Infrastructure: Legislative and behavioral approaches in the context of urban engineering10.2478/cee-2023-0068 ↗
45. Samek, M. (2025). A Holistic Approach to the Recovery of Industrial Wastes in Pavement Constructions. [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Zilina].
46. Technology development and sustainable construction
47. Pulaski, M.H., Horman, M., Riley, D., Dahl, P., Hickey, A., Lapinski, A., and Vittori, G. (2004). Field Guide for Sustainable Construction, The Pennsylvania State University. Pentagon Renovation and Construction Program Office Safety Sustainability and Environment IPT and Washington Headquarters Services Defense.
48. Juhás, M. (2023). Balance of Waste Generation in the Slovak Republic in 2005 and 2020. [Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Zilina].
49. Spišáková, M., Mandičák, T., Mésároš, P., and Špak, M. (2022). Waste management in a sustainable circular economy as a part of design of construction. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094553 ↗
50. Mandičák, T., Spišáková, M., and Mésároš, P. (2024). Sustainable design and building information modeling of construction project management towards a circular economy. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16114376 ↗
51. Remišová, E., Decký, M., and Papán, D. (2025). Sustainable Materials and Technologies for Design and Construction of Pavements, Pearson.
52. Hunter, R.N., Self, A., and Read, J. (2015). The Shell Bitumen Handbook, ICE Publishing. [6th ed.].10.1680/tsbh.58378 ↗
53. (2016). Bituminous Mixtures. Material Specifications. Part 8: Reclaimed Asphalt (Standard No. EN 13108-8:2016).
54. EAPA (2025, July 02). Asphalt in Figures. Available online: https://eapa.org/asphalt-in-figures-2023/.
55. Šrámek, J., Decký, M., Zgútová, K., Kozel, M., and Remek, Ľ. (2025, June 17). Management of R-material. Analytical task, Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovakia, (In Slovak).
56. (1992). Laboratory Determination of the California Bearing Ratio of Soils (Standard No. STN 72 1016). (In Slovak).
57. (2022). Unbound and Hydraulically Bound Mixtures. Part 47: Test Method for the Determination of California Bearing Ratio, Immediate Bearing Index and Linear Swelling (Standard No. EN 13286-47: 2022).
58. (2019). Static Plate Load Test of Building Constructions (Standard No. STN 73 6190). (In Slovak).
59. (2017). Road Building. Roads Embankments and Subgrades (Standard No. STN 73 6133). (In Slovak).
60. (1988). Laboratory Determination of Earth Compactibility (Standard No. STN 72 1015). (In Slovak).
61. Plati, C., Tsakoumaki, M., and Gkyrtis, K. (2023). Physical and Mechanical Properties of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Incorporated into Unbound Pavement Layers. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010362 ↗
62. Properties of unbound base course mixes with recycled asphalt
63. Hodásová, K. (2024). Innovative, Climate-Adaptive Constructions of Paved Traffic Surfaces. [Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Zilina].
64. Decky, M., Hodasova, K., Papanova, Z., and Remisova, E. (2022). Sustainable adaptive cycle pavements using composite foam concrete at high altitudes in central Europe. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14159034 ↗
65. Assessment of suitability of reclaimed asphalt pavement material for use in cement concrete pavements
66. Sustainable practice in pavement engineering through value-added collective recycling of waste plastic and waste tyre rubber10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.020 ↗
67. Environmental and economic assessment of collective recycling waste plastic and reclaimed asphalt pavement into pavement construction: A case study in Hong Kong10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130405 ↗
68. Design and performance assessment of sustainable road pothole patching materials using waste cooking oil, plastic, and reclaimed asphalt pavement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136426 ↗
69. Ji, G., Wang, X., Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., Yin, Q., and Luo, Y. (2021). Study on the Physical, Chemical and Nano-Microstructure Characteristics of Asphalt Mixed with Recycled Eggshell Waste. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132011173 ↗
70. Green synthesis of nanoparticles from biodegradable waste extracts and their applications: A critical review10.1007/s41204-022-00276-8 ↗
71. A review study on utilization of waste cooking oil, eggshell, glass, and plastic in bituminous mixtures
72. Review of Nanomaterials in Pavement Engineering10.1021/acsanm.4c06153 ↗
73. Zhang, J., Sesay, T., You, Q., and Jing, H. (2022). Maximizing the Application of RAP in Asphalt Concrete Pavements and Its Long-Term Performance: A Review. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14214736 ↗
74. Blacktop, R. (2025, November 03). 6 Benefits of Recycling Asphalt. Richfield Blacktop. Available online: https://www.richfieldblacktop.com/asphalt-recycling.
75. The utilization of waste plastics in asphalt pavements: A review10.1016/j.clema.2021.100031 ↗