The MUG-10 Framework for Preventing Usability Issues in Mobile Application Development
Source abstract
Abstract
Nowadays, mobile applications are essential tools for everyday life, providing users with anytime, anywhere access to up-to-date information, communication, and entertainment. Needless to say, hardware limitations and the diverse needs of different user groups pose a number of design and development challenges. According to recent studies, usability is one of the most revealing among many others. However, few have made the direct effort to provide and discuss what countermeasures can be applied to avoid usability issues in mobile application development. Through a survey of 20 mobile software design and development practitioners, this study aims to fill this research gap. Given the qualitative nature of the data collected, and with the goal of capturing and preserving the intrinsic meanings embedded in the experts’ statements, we adopted in vivo coding. The analysis of the collected material enabled us to develop a novel framework consisting of ten guidelines and three activities with general applications. In addition, it can be noted that active collaboration with users in testing and collecting feedback was often emphasized at each stage of mobile application development. Future research should consider focused action research that evaluates the effectiveness of our recommendations and validates them across different stakeholder groups. In this regard, the development of automated tools to support early detection and mitigation of usability issues during mobile application development could also be considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Usability and User Interface Design · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Mobile and Web Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Pomorskie, Poland
Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Kazimierza Gorskiego 1, 80-336 Gdansk, Pomorskie, Poland
Funding
Department of Software Engineering
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Statista (2025, August 09). Mobile App Usage —Statistics & Facts. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1002/mobile-app-usage/.
2. Wagner, C. (2025, April 26). How Companies Can Do More with Mobile Apps. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2023/12/08/how-companies-can-do-more-with-mobile-apps/.
3. Grand View Research (2025, April 23). Mobile Application Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Store (Google Store, Apple Store, Others), by Application (Gaming, Music & Entertainment, Health & Fitness, Social Networking), and Region, Segment Forecasts, 2024–2030. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/mobile-application-market.
4. Gawlik-Kobylińska, M., Kabashkin, I., Misnevs, B., and Maciejewski, P. (2023). Education mobility as a service: A study of the features of a novel mobility platform. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13095245 ↗
5. Explainable assessment of financial experts’ credibility by classifying social media forecasts and checking the predictions with actual market data10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124515 ↗
6. Vision, application scenarios, and key technology trends for 6G mobile communications10.1007/s11432-021-3351-5 ↗
7. Current trends in consumption of multimedia content using online streaming platforms: A user-centric survey10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100268 ↗
8. Mobile application usability evaluation: A study based on demography10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166893 ↗
9. Usability evaluation of the smartphone user interface in supporting elderly users from experts’ perspective10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2827358 ↗
10. Usability of mobile applications: A systematic literature study10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981892 ↗
11. (1998). Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)—Part 11: Guidance on Usability (Standard No. ISO 9241-11:1998(en)). Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en.
12. Daif, A., Dahroug, A.T., López-Nores, M., González-Soutelo, S., Bassani, M., Antoniou, A., Gil-Solla, A., Ramos-Cabrer, M., and Pazos-Arias, J.J. (2018). A mobile app to learn about cultural and historical associations in a closed loop with humanities experts. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9010009 ↗
13. Weichbroth, P. (2018, January 9–12). Usability attributes revisited: A time-framed knowledge map. Proceedings of the IEEE 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Poznań, Poland.10.15439/2018F137 ↗
14. Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Acosta, B., Salvador-Ullauri, L., Villegas-Ch, W., and Gonzalez, M. (2021). Accessibility in native mobile applications for users with disabilities: A scoping review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11125707 ↗
15. Iakovets, A., Balog, M., and Židek, K. (2022). The use of mobile applications for sustainable development of SMEs in the context of Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010429 ↗
16. A user experience evaluation framework for mobile usability10.1142/S0218194017500097 ↗
17. Au, F.T., Baker, S., Warren, I., and Dobbie, G. (2008, January 1). Automated usability testing framework. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Australasian User Interface, Wollongong, Australia.
18. Lee, K.B., and Grice, R.A. (October, January 29). Developing a new usability testing method for mobile devices. Proceedings of the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, IPCC 2004, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
19. Kluth, W., Krempels, K.H., and Samsel, C. (2014, January 3–5). Automated usability testing for mobile applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, SCITEPRESS, Barcelona, Spain.
20. Design and implementation of a toolkit for usability testing of mobile apps10.1007/s11036-012-0421-z ↗
21. Arif, K.S., and Ali, U. (2019, January 30–31). Mobile Application testing tools and their challenges: A comparative study. Proceedings of the IEEE 2019 2nd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), Sukkur, Pakistan.10.1109/ICOMET.2019.8673505 ↗
22. A systematic literature review of mobile application usability: Addressing the design perspective10.1007/s10209-022-00903-w ↗
23. Usability testing of mobile learning applications: A systematic mapping study
24. Akmal Muhamat, N., Hasan, R., Saddki, N., Mohd Arshad, M.R., and Ahmad, M. (2021). Development and usability testing of mobile application on diet and oral health. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0257035 ↗
25. Storm, M., Fjellså, H.M.H., Skjærpe, J.N., Myers, A.L., Bartels, S.J., and Fortuna, K.L. (2021). Usability testing of a mobile health application for self-management of serious mental illness in a Norwegian community mental health setting. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18168667 ↗
26. Design and usability evaluation of a mobile app for elementary school inquiry-based science learning10.1111/ssm.18303 ↗
27. Weichbroth, P. (2024). Usability testing of mobile applications: A methodological framework. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14051792 ↗
28. Ballard, B. (2007). Designing the Mobile User Experience, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470060575 ↗
29. SUSapp: A Free Mobile Application That Makes the System Usability Scale (SUS) Easier to Administer
30. La, H.J., Lee, H.J., and Kim, S.D. (2011, January 10–12). An efficiency-centric design methodology for mobile application architectures. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), Shanghai, China.10.1109/WiMOB.2011.6085388 ↗
31. Usability and accessibility assessment of Saudi Arabia mobile e-government websites10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068917 ↗
32. An Important Aspect of Satisfaction on Mobile Apps: An Usability Evaluation Based on Gender10.35877/454RI.jinav1568 ↗
33. Hajesmaeel-Gohari, S., Khordastan, F., Fatehi, F., Samzadeh, H., and Bahaadinbeigy, K. (2022). The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 22.10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2 ↗
34. Iacob, C., and Harrison, R. (2013, January 18–19). Retrieving and analyzing mobile apps feature requests from online reviews. Proceedings of the IEEE 2013 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/MSR.2013.6624001 ↗
35. Iacob, C., Veerappa, V., and Harrison, R. (2013, January 9–13). What are you complaining about?: A study of online reviews of mobile applications. Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2013), BCS Learning & Development, London, UK.10.14236/ewic/HCI2013.38 ↗
36. A review on usability issues in mobile applications
37. Weichbroth, P., and Baj-Rogowska, A. (2019, January 1–4). Do online reviews reveal mobile application usability and user experience? The case of WhatsApp. Proceedings of the IEEE 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Leipzig, Germany.10.15439/2019F289 ↗
38. Statista (2025, August 28). Number of Mobile Game Users Worldwide from 2017 to 2030 (in Billions). Available online: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/667694/number-mobile-gamers-worldwide.
39. Ho, S.C., and Tu, Y.C. (2011, January 4). The investigation of online reviews of mobile games. Proceedings of the Workshop on E-Business, Shanghai, China.10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_13 ↗
40. Usability issues with mobile applications: Insights from practitioners and future research directions10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3573503 ↗
41. Neil, T. (2014). Mobile Design Pattern Gallery: UI Patterns for Smartphone Apps, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
42. A pattern approach to mobile interaction design
43. Usability studies on mobile user interface design patterns: A systematic literature review10.1155/2017/6787504 ↗
44. da Silva, L.F., Parreira Junior, P.A., and Freire, A.P. (2022). Mobile user interaction design patterns: A systematic mapping study. Information, 13.10.3390/info13050236 ↗
45. A systematic literature review: Opinion mining studies from mobile app store user reviews10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.027 ↗
46. Aggarwal, C. (2025, July 09). Documenting the Right Things: Writing Documentation for Mobile App Development. Available online: https://chetan-aggarwal.medium.com/documenting-the-right-things-writing-documentation-for-mobile-app-development-5f0f024fa5ef.
47. Mykhailov, M. (2025, July 09). How to Write a Proper Mobile App Requirements Document in 5 Steps. Available online: https://nix-united.com/blog/how-to-write-a-proper-mobile-app-requirements-document-in-5-steps/.
48. Kortum, F., Klünder, J., and Schneider, K. (2016, January 22–24). Miscommunication in software projects: Early recognition through tendency forecasts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Trondheim, Norway.10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_62 ↗
49. Usability, user experience and mental workload in a mobile Augmented Reality application for digital storytelling in cultural heritage10.1007/s10055-022-00712-9 ↗
50. Chan, M. (2025, August 08). Storytelling in UX Work: Study Guide. Available online: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/storytelling-study-guide/.
51. Velhinho, A., Quintero, E., Pedro, L., and Almeida, P. (2024, January 13–15). Usability Study of a Mobile Platform for Community Memory Sharing and Audiovisual Storytelling. Proceedings of the Iberoamerican Conference on Applications and Usability of Interactive TV, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.10.1007/978-3-032-01162-6_8 ↗
52. The state of user-centered design practice10.1145/1047671.1047677 ↗
53. Trujillo-Lopez, L.A., Raymundo-Guevara, R.A., and Morales-Arevalo, J.C. (2025). User-Centered Design of a Computer Vision System for Monitoring PPE Compliance in Manufacturing. Computers, 14.10.20944/preprints202506.2464.v1 ↗
54. Applying user-centered techniques to analyze and design a mobile application10.1186/s40411-018-0049-1 ↗
55. Singh, V.P., and Golden Rules for Mobile System Design Interviews (2025, August 09). Mobile System Design Explained in Detail with Examples. Available online: https://medium.com/\spacefactor\@m{}engineervishvnath/golden-rules-for-mobile-system-design-interviews-bd7b71e4f454.
56. Sky Web Design Technologies (2025, July 09). How to Balance Performance and Design in Mobile App Development. Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-balance-performance-design-mobile-app-gyzic/.
57. Cheng, L.C. (2016, January 13–15). The mobile app usability inspection (MAUi) framework as a guide for minimal viable product (MVP) testing in lean development cycle. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference in HCI and UX Indonesia 2016, Jakarta, Indonesia.10.1145/2898459.2898460 ↗
58. A comprehensive learnability framework for mobile application design for older adults10.1007/s10209-024-01147-6 ↗
59. Comparing low and high-fidelity prototypes in mobile phone evaluation10.4018/jtd.2012100101 ↗
60. Kanai, S., Horiuchi, S., Kikuta, Y., Yokoyama, A., and Shiroma, Y. (2007, January 22–27). An integrated environment for testing and assessing the usability of information appliances using digital and physical mock-ups. Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Reality, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-540-73335-5_52 ↗
61. Greencoin: Prototype of a mobile application facilitating and evidencing pro-environmental behavior of citizens10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.037 ↗
62. Improving user experience for passenger information systems. Prototypes and reference objects10.1109/TPC.2013.2257211 ↗
63. The World Wide Web Consortium (2025, August 08). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/.
64. Halpin, M. (2025, August 08). Understanding the POUR Accessibility Principles. Available online: https://reciteme.com/news/pour-accessibility-principles/.
65. Ballantyne, M., Jha, A., Jacobsen, A., Hawker, J.S., and El-Glaly, Y.N. (2018, January 25–28). Study of accessibility guidelines of mobile applications. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Cairo, Egypt.10.1145/3282894.3282921 ↗
66. Design Develop Now (2025, August 09). Stop Losing Users: How Mobile App Responsive Design Saves You. Available online: https://designdevelopnow.com/blog/mobile-app-responsive-design/.
67. The Role of Responsive Design in Web Development
68. Putting mobile application privacy in context: An empirical study of user privacy expectations for mobile devices10.1080/01972243.2016.1153012 ↗
69. User privacy and data flow control for android apps: Systematic literature review
70. Lee, M., and Kim, G.J. (2015, January 14–18). On applying experience sampling method to a/b testing of mobile applications: A case study. Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Bamberg, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_17 ↗
71. Samuel, T., and Pfahl, D. (2016, January 22–24). Problems and solutions in mobile application testing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Trondheim, Norway.10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_16 ↗
72. Neusesser, T. (2025, September 13). A/B Testing 101. Available online: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ab-testing/.
73. Glance (2025, September 14). How Many Users Do I Need For Effective App Testing?. Available online: https://thisisglance.com/learning-centre/how-many-users-do-i-need-for-effective-app-testing.
74. User interface design & evaluation of mobile applications
75. Adinata, M., and Liem, I. (2014, January 26–27). A/B test tools of native mobile application. Proceedings of the IEEE 2014 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICODSE), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/ICODSE.2014.7062683 ↗
76. Krüger, J.D. (2025). Optimizing e-commerce relaunches: A rigorous economic framework employing a/b testing for enhanced conversion rates and risk mitigation. Preprint.10.20944/preprints202506.1260.v1 ↗
77. King, R., Churchill, E.F., and Tan, C. (2017). Designing with Data: Improving the User Experience with A/B Testing, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
78. Goswami, A., Han, W., Wang, Z., and Jiang, A. (November, January 29). Controlled experiments for decision-making in e-Commerce search. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Santa Clara, CA, USA.10.1109/BigData.2015.7363863 ↗
79. Saleh, A.M., and Ismail, R.B. (2015, January 9–10). The Impact of Dynamic Prototype on Usability Testing and User Satisfaction: Fidelity and In-situ Prototyping. Proceedings of the 3rd Global Summit on Education GSE 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
80. Kim, S.Y., and Lee, Y. (2020, January 16–20). Using High Fidelity Interactive Prototypes for Effective Communication to Create an Enterprise Mobile Application. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Virtual.10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_23 ↗
81. Nielsen, J. (2025, August 08). 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Available online: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/.
82. Global App Testing (2025, September 20). The Ultimate Guide to Smoke Testing. Available online: https://www.globalapptesting.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-smoke-testing.
83. Smoke testing for machine learning: Simple tests to discover severe bugs10.1007/s10664-021-10073-7 ↗
84. Reshma, S., Mohan Kumar, H., and Manu, A. (2022, January 26–27). Smoke Test Execution in Software Application Testing. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology, ICERECT, Mandya, India.
85. Pérez-Fernández, L., Sebastián, M.A., and González-Gaya, C. (2022). Methodology to optimize quality costs in manufacturing based on multi-criteria analysis and lean strategies. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073295 ↗
86. Six Sigma Development Solution (2025, September 16). Impact Effort Matrix: Prioritize Projects with Our Simple Guide. Available online: https://sixsigmadsi.com/what-is-an-impact-effort-matrix-how-does-it-work/.
87. Gök, S. (2025, July 09). Design the Best UX with These 7 Guidelines. Available online: https://www.iienstitu.com/en/blog/design-the-best-ux-with-these-7-guidelines.
88. User involvement and usability evaluation in Ethiopian software organizations10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00616.x ↗
89. Design patterns for user interface for mobile applications10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.017 ↗
90. Dutson, P. (2014). Responsive Mobile Design: Designing for Every Device, Addison-Wesley Professional.
91. Patel, J., Gershoni, G., Krishnan, S., Nelimarkka, M., Nonnecke, B., and Goldberg, K. (2015, January 24–27). A case study in mobile-optimized vs. responsive web application design. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.1145/2786567.2787135 ↗
92. Evaluating the effects of responsive design on the usability of academic websites in the pandemic10.1007/s10639-021-10650-9 ↗
93. de Paula, D.F., Menezes, B.H., and Araújo, C.C. (2014, January 22–27). Building a quality mobile application: A user-centered study focusing on design thinking, user experience and usability. Proceedings of the International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, Heraklion, Greece.10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_29 ↗
94. User-centered design of a mobile medication management10.1080/17538157.2018.1437042 ↗
95. Quezada, P., Cueva, R., and Paz, F. (2021, January 24–29). A systematic review of user-centered design techniques applied to the design of mobile application user interfaces. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Virtual.10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_7 ↗
96. Jurgensen, C. (2011, January 23–26). Motivation in lifestyle changes: Using mock-ups as a tool for exploring the design space. Proceedings of the IEEE 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, Dublin, Ireland.10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.246028 ↗
97. Nurses’ Participation in the design of an intensive care unit: The use of virtual mock-ups
98. Duan, P., Warner, J., Li, Y., and Hartmann, B. (2024, January 11–16). Generating automatic feedback on ui mockups with large language models. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3613904.3642782 ↗
99. Do mock-ups, presentations of evidence, and Q&As help participants voice their opinions during focus groups and interviews about supervised injection services?10.1177/16094069211033439 ↗
100. Huq, S.F., Tafreshipour, M., Kalcevich, K., and Malek, S. (May, January 27). Automated Generation of Accessibility Test Reports from Recorded User Transcripts. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE/ACM 47th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Ottawa, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICSE55347.2025.00043 ↗