An In Vitro Study Comparing Debonding of Orthodontic Ceramic and Metal Brackets Using Er:YAG Laser and Conventional Pliers
Source abstract
Abstract
Removing orthodontic brackets often presents clinical challenges, as it may cause patient discomfort, bracket fracture, or enamel damage resulting from strong adhesive bonds. Various techniques have been proposed to facilitate safer and more efficient debonding. Among them, laser-assisted methods have gained attention for their potential to minimize mechanical stress and improve patient comfort. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an erbium-doped yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Er:YAG) laser as an alternative to traditional mechanical methods for removing metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six extracted premolars were prepared for bonding metal or ceramic brackets using a light-cure adhesive system. The control group consisted of six ceramic and six metal brackets removed with conventional orthodontic pliers. In the experimental groups, brackets were debonded using the Er:YAG laser (2940 nm, 0.6 mm spot size, 150 mJ; 15 Hz; (2.25 W) with an H14 handpiece. Irradiation time was recorded for each method, and teeth were rescanned to measure the surface area and volume of the crowns before and after bracket removal. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for surface analysis. Results: A significant difference in debonding time (p = 0.001) was observed between the laser and traditional methods. The laser group took 52.5 s for metal and 56.25 s for ceramic brackets, compared to 1.05 s (metal) and 0.64 s (ceramic) in the traditional group. A significant difference in remaining cement volume was noted (p = 0.0002), but no differences were found between metal and ceramic brackets with laser removal. Conclusions: Er:YAG laser-assisted debonding is safe and minimally invasive but more time-consuming and costly than conventional methods, showing no improvement in clinical efficiency under current parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of General Practice, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
Integrated Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review10.1067/mod.2003.2 ↗
2. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods10.1016/0889-5406(90)70008-Z ↗
3. Brantley, W.A., and Eliades, T. (2001). Orthodontic brackets. Orthodontic Materials Scientific and Clinical Aspects, Thieme.10.1055/b-002-43889 ↗
4. CO2 laser as auxiliary in the debonding of ceramic brackets10.1007/s10103-014-1688-z ↗
5. CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules10.1007/s10103-013-1482-3 ↗
6. Safety and Efficacy of the Erbium Laser in Debonding Dental Accessories: A Narrative Review10.1089/photob.2023.0139 ↗
7. In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments10.1111/jopr.13077 ↗
8. Retrieval of Glass Fiber Post Using Er:YAG Laser and Conventional Endodontic Ultrasonic Method: An In Vitro Study10.1111/jopr.13114 ↗
9. Elkharashi, A., Grzech-Leśniak, K., Deeb, J.G., Abdulmajeed, A.A., and Bencharit, S. (2020). Exploring the use of pulsed erbium lasers to retrieve a zirconia crown from a zirconia implant abutment. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0233536 ↗
10. Evaluation of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation for the debonding of prefabricated zirconia crowns10.17219/acem/127686 ↗
11. Grzech-Leśniak, K., Bencharit, S., Skrjanc, L., Kanduti, D., Matys, J., and Deeb, J.G. (2020). Utilization of Er:YAG Laser in Retrieving and Reusing of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Monolithic Crowns in Natural Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Appl. Sci., 10.10.20944/preprints202006.0137.v1 ↗
12. Deeb, J.G., McCall, C., Carrico, C.K., Dahlke, W.O., and Grzech-Leśniak, K. (2020). Retrieval of Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser from Primary and Permanent Molars. Materials, 13.10.20944/preprints202010.0007.v1 ↗
13. Erbium laser-assisted ceramic debonding: A scoping review10.1111/jopr.13613 ↗
14. Efficiency of dry versus wet Er,Cr:YSGG laser debonding of lithium disilicate veneers using different power outputs10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.008 ↗
15. Khalil, A.S., Tamish, N.M., and Elkalza, A.R. (2022). Assessment of chemical, ultrasonic, diode laser, and Er:YAG laser application on debonding of ceramic brackets. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02111-7 ↗
16. Villalobos-Tinoco, J., Andretti, F., Conner, C., Rojas-Rueda, S., Fischer, N.G., Pagan-Banchs, M., and Jurado, C.A. (2025). A Narrative Review and Clinical Study on Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Ceramic and Composite Veneers. Biomimetics, 10.10.3390/biomimetics10050295 ↗
17. Florczak-Matyjek, A., Nikodem, A., Kensy, J., Matys, J., and Grzech-Leśniak, K. (2025). The Efficacy of Erbium-Ion, Diode, and CO2 Lasers in Debonding Attachments Used During Overlay Orthodontic Treatment and the Risk of Hard Tooth Tissue Damage Compared to Traditional Methods—An In Vitro Study. Photonics, 12.10.3390/photonics12060621 ↗
18. Grzech-Leśniak, K., and Matys, J. (2021). The Effect of Er:YAG Lasers on the Reduction of Aerosol Formation for Dental Workers. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14112857 ↗
19. Alves, L.V.G.L., da Silva, M.B.F., Borsatto, M.C., and Corona, S.A.M. (2023). Do erbium lasers promote changes in the tooth enamel during debonding of ceramic laminate veneers? A systematic review. Lasers Med. Sci., 38.10.1007/s10103-023-03882-3 ↗
20. Assessment of an Impact of a Diode Laser Mode with Wavelength of 980 nm on a Temperature Rise Measured by Means of k-02 Thermocouple: Preliminary Results10.17219/dmp/62575 ↗
21. Laser dentistry in daily practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits, risks and recommendations for safe treatments10.17219/acem/130598 ↗
22. In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70217-8 ↗
23. Comparison of different bonding materials for laser debonding10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70020-X ↗
24. Super pulse CO2 laser for bracket bonding and debonding10.1093/ejo/21.2.193 ↗
25. The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage10.1089/pho.2016.4115 ↗
26. Thermal effect of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG used for debonding ceramic and metal orthodontic brackets: An experimental analysis10.17219/acem/118844 ↗
27. Debonding of ceramic brackets by Er:YAG laser
28. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: An in vitro study10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70212-9 ↗
29. Rapid debonding of polycrystalline ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er:YAG laser: An in vitro study10.1007/s10103-013-1274-9 ↗
30. Khalil, A.S., Baowideen, F.A., Alhujaili, A.S., Alotaibi, N.F., Almanjhi, W.A., Yassin, H.Y., Nasser, M.M., Alzahrani, A.F., and Alrehaili, R.S. (2024). Efficacy of Lasers in Debonding Ceramic Brackets: Exploring the Rationale and Methods. Cureus, 16.10.7759/cureus.61050 ↗
31. Lawrence, J. (2018). Chapter 24—Development of Laser Processing Technologies via Experimental Design. Woodhead Publishing Series in Welding and Other Joining Technologies, Advances in Laser Materials Processing, Woodhead Publishing. [2nd ed.].
32. Luo, Q., Huang, N., Fu, T., Wang, J., Bartles, D.L., Simpson, T.W., and Beese, A.M. (2023). New insight into the multivariate relationships among process, structure, and properties in laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg. Addit. Manuf., 77.10.1016/j.addma.2023.103804 ↗
33. Xian, G., Qi, X., Shi, J., Tian, J., and Xiao, H. (2025). Toughened and self-healing carbon nanotube/epoxy resin composites modified with polycaprolactone filler for coatings, adhesives and FRP. J. Build. Eng., 111.10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113207 ↗
34. Zhang, S.-Q., Dong, H., Han, Y., Xu, L., Feng, Y.-K., and Li, P.-Y. (2024). Coupling Effect of Disconnected Pores and Grain Morphology on the Corrosion Tolerance of Laser-Clad 316L Coating. Coatings, 14.10.3390/coatings14010040 ↗
35. Vlasa, A., Bud, E.S., Păcurar, M., Lazăr, L., Streiche, L., Bucur, S.M., Cocoș, D.I., and Bud, A. (2021). Effects of Composite Resin on the Enamel after Debonding: An In Vitro Study-Metal Brackets vs. Ceramic Brackets. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167353 ↗
36. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences10.3758/BF03193146 ↗
37. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis10.1089/pho.2017.4412 ↗
38. Abdulaziz, A., El-Kholy, M.M., Bushra, S.S., Ali, S.M., and Shehab, K.A. (2024). Performance of two laser motion modes versus conventional orthodontic ceramic brackets debonding technique on enamel surface topography. Lasers Med. Sci., 39.10.1007/s10103-024-04097-w ↗
39. Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using adhesive systems mixed with TiO2 nanoparticles10.1590/2177-6709.23.4.43.e1-7.onl ↗
40. Deeb, J.G., Crowell, A., Richey, K.H., Bencharit, S., Carrico, C.K., Williams, T.L., and Grzech-Leśniak, K. (2022). In Vitro Study of Laser-Assisted Prefabricated Ceramic Crown Debonding as Compared to Traditional Rotary Instrument Removal. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15103617 ↗
41. Physical properties and clinical characteristics of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review
42. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro10.2319/032414-224.1 ↗
43. Bora, N., Mahanta, P., Kalita, D., Deka, S., Konwar, R., and Phukan, C. (2021). Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study. Sci. World J., 2021.10.1155/2021/5561040 ↗
44. Hoteit, M., Nammour, S., and Zeinoun, T. (2020). Evaluation of Enamel Topography after Debonding Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets by Different Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG Lasers Settings. Dent. J., 8.10.3390/dj8010006 ↗
45. Laser-Aided Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Comprehensive Review10.15171/jlms.2016.02 ↗
46. Comparison of shear bond strength of universal adhesives on etched and nonetched enamel
47. The effect of the use of the deproteinization agent hypochlorous acid and two different pit and fissure sealant self-adhesive flowable composites upon its bonding with the enamel10.22514/jocpd.2024.016 ↗