Geo-PhysNet: A Geometry-Aware and Physics-Constrained Graph Neural Network for Aerodynamic Pressure Prediction on Vehicle Fluid–Solid Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
The aerodynamic pressure of a car is crucial for its shape design. To overcome the time-consuming and costly bottleneck of wind tunnel tests and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, deep learning-based surrogate models have emerged as highly promising alternatives. However, existing methods that only predict on the surface of objects only learn the mapping of pressure. In contrast, a physically realistic field has values and gradients that are structurally unified and self-consistent. Therefore, existing methods ignore the crucial differential structure and intrinsic continuity of the physical field as a whole. This oversight leads to their predictions, even if locally numerically close, often showing unrealistic gradient distributions and high-frequency oscillations macroscopically, greatly limiting their reliability and practicality in engineering decisions. To address this, this study proposes the Geo-PhysNet model, a graph neural network framework specifically designed for complex surface manifolds with strong physical constraints. This framework learns a differential representation, and its network architecture is designed to simultaneously predict the pressure scalar field and its tangential gradient vector field on the surface manifold within a unified framework. By making the gradient an explicit learning target, we force the network to understand the local mechanical causes leading to pressure changes, thereby mathematically ensuring the self-consistency of the field’s intrinsic structure, rather than merely learning the numerical mapping of pressure. Finally, to solve the common noise problem in the predictions of existing methods, we introduce a physical regularization term based on the surface Laplacian operator to penalize non-smooth solutions, ensuring the physical rationality of the final output field. Experimental verification results show that Geo-PhysNet not only outperforms existing benchmark models in numerical accuracy but, more importantly, demonstrates superior advantages in the physical authenticity, field continuity, and gradient smoothness of the generated pressure fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Funding
International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Sichuan Province · Central Government Guides Local Projects of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111334 ↗
2. Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake
3. Experimental and numerical investigation of the DrivAer model
4. Heft, A.I., Indinger, T., and Adams, N.A. (2012). Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations, SAE International. Technical Report, SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2012-01-0168 ↗
5. Evaluation of CFD methodologies for prediction of flows around simplified and complex automotive models10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105297 ↗
6. Deep learning methods for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of airfoil flows10.2514/1.J058291 ↗
7. A generative design and drag coefficient prediction system for sedan car side silhouettes based on computational fluid dynamics10.1016/j.cad.2019.02.003 ↗
8. Surrogate modeling of car drag coefficient with depth and normal renderings
9. Meshsdf: Differentiable iso-surface extraction
10. Jacob, S.J., Mrosek, M., Othmer, C., and Köstler, H. (2021). Deep learning for real-time aerodynamic evaluations of arbitrary vehicle shapes. arXiv.10.4271/15-15-02-0006 ↗
11. Geometry-informed neural operator for large-scale 3d pdes
12. Pfaff, T., Fortunato, M., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., and Battaglia, P. (2020, January 26–30). Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
13. Wu, H., Luo, H., Wang, H., Wang, J., and Long, M. (2024). Transolver: A fast transformer solver for pdes on general geometries. arXiv.
14. Physics-informed PointNet: A deep learning solver for steady-state incompressible flows and thermal fields on multiple sets of irregular geometries10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111510 ↗
15. Deng, J., Li, X., Xiong, H., Hu, X., and Ma, J. (2024, January 7–11). Geometry-guided conditional adaption for surrogate models of large-scale 3d PDEs on arbitrary geometries. Proceedings of the ICLR 2024 Annual Conference, Vienna, Austria.
16. Chang, A.X., Funkhouser, T., Guibas, L., Hanrahan, P., Huang, Q., Li, Z., Savarese, S., Savva, M., Song, S., and Su, H. (2015). Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository. arXiv.
17. Elrefaie, M., Dai, A., and Ahmed, F. (2024, January 25–28). DrivAerNet: A Parametric Car Dataset for Data-Driven Aerodynamic Design and Graph-Based Drag Prediction. Proceedings of the ASME 2024 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, USA.10.1115/DETC2024-143593 ↗