Analysis of the Structural Responses of Adjacent Components to the Operation of a Polymer-Based Explosive Fire Suppression System
Source abstract
Abstract
With the rapid expansion of electric vehicles, the risk of battery fires has become a critical safety concern. Conventional suppression methods, such as submerging battery packs in large water tanks, are inefficient due to long response times and potential secondary hazards. This study introduces a polymer-based fire suppression tube system that automatically activates under specific conditions. The system utilizes energy from a C4 explosion to rupture the tube, rapidly releasing the extinguishing agents stored inside. Explicit dynamics simulations in ANSYS Workbench 2024 R2 were conducted by varying tube thickness from 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm to evaluate the structural response of adjacent components. Three indices were examined: total deformation, deformation of the adjacent plate, and deformation of the tube itself. The results showed that thinner tubes (0.5 mm) allowed for greater propagation of blast energy, increasing the risk of damage, whereas thicker tubes (≥1.5 mm) effectively confined the explosive energy and reduced shock transmission. These findings confirm that tube thickness is a key parameter governing blast-induced deformation, with 1.5 mm identified as the threshold for minimizing structural damage. This study provides practical design guidelines for polymer-based automatic suppression systems, contributing to safer fire protection solutions for electric vehicles and related industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Risk and Safety Analysis · Fire dynamics and safety research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Future Mobility, Dong-Eui University, 176 Eomgwang-ro, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea
Digital Twin Laboratory, Dong-Eui University, 176 Eomgwang-ro, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Battery Fires in Electric Vehicles10.1007/s10694-019-00944-3 ↗
2. Fire Safety Research Institute (FSRI) (2023). Fire Safety of Batteries and Electric Vehicles, UL Research Institutes Report.
3. Issues and Challenges Facing Rechargeable Lithium Batteries10.1038/35104644 ↗
4. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective10.1021/ja3091438 ↗
5. Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries10.1021/cm901452z ↗
6. Building Better Batteries10.1038/451652a ↗
7. In-Operando High-Speed Tomography of Lithium-Ion Batteries during Thermal Runaway10.1038/ncomms7924 ↗
8. Over-Heating Triggered Thermal Runaway Behavior for Lithium-Ion Battery with High Nickel Content in Positive Electrode10.1016/j.energy.2021.120072 ↗
9. Rask, E., Stutenberg, K., and Waller, T. (2021). Li-Ion Battery Pack Immersion Exploratory Investigation, United States Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 813 136.
10. Ineris (2023). Summary of Work on Extinguishing Li-Ion Battery Fires of Electric Vehicles, Ineris Report.
11. Collision-Caused Thermal Runaway Investigation of Li-Ion Battery in Real-World Electric Vehicles10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121901 ↗
12. A Study on Explosion and Fire Risk of Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Polymer Battery
13. Experimental Study of Explosive Water Mist Extinguishing Fire10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.655 ↗
14. Response of Cylindrical Tubes Subjected to Internal Blast Loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115004 ↗
15. On the Dynamic Response of Blast-Loaded Steel Plates with and without Pre-Formed Holes10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.04.001 ↗
16. Dispersion Pattern Simulation of Tungsten Impactors According to Mass and Shape of Explosives10.3795/KSME-A.2014.38.12.1325 ↗
17. Kuracina, R., Szabová, Z., Buranská, E., Kosár, L., Rantuch, P., Blinová, L., Měřínská, D., Gogola, P., and Jurina, F. (2023). Study into the fire and explosion characteristics of polymer powders used in engineering production technologies. Polymers, 15.10.20944/preprints202309.1981.v1 ↗
18. Blast wave induced strain measurements in polymers using FBG sensor inside shock tube10.1016/j.measurement.2023.114045 ↗
19. Radermacher, L., and Mateescu, T. (2020, January 26–27). Study on the Behaviour of High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipes Buried, on the Explosion’s Effect. Proceedings of the International Conference Building Services and Energy Efficiency, London, UK.10.2478/9788395720413-023 ↗
20. A multi–physics methodology for the simulation of reactive flow and elastoplastic structural response10.1016/j.jcp.2018.03.037 ↗
21. Gu, M., Wang, H., Chen, G., Yu, A., Dang, W., and Ling, X. (2024). Experimental and numerical study on explosion resistance of polyurea-coated shelter in petrochemical industry. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-71339-w ↗
22. Crash Safety Evaluation of LNG Fuel Containers for Vehicles Using ANSYS Explicit Dynamics
23. Zhang, S., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Bai, Z., and Cao, X. (2024). Numerical study on explosion risk and building structure dynamics of long-distance oil and gas tunnels. Fire, 7.10.3390/fire7090302 ↗
24. On dynamic response and damage evaluation of bridge piers under far-field explosion loads
25. Numerical simulation of overpressure loads generated by gas explosions in utility tunnels10.1016/j.psep.2022.03.014 ↗
26. A Study on Analysis of Explosion Damage Reduction Effect on Protective Wall for Hydrogen Production Base via Explosion Simulation