Data Distribution Strategies for Mixed Traffic Flows in Software-Defined Networks: A QoE-Driven Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of heterogeneous applications, from latency-critical video delivery to bandwidth-intensive file transfers, poses increasing challenges for modern communication networks. Traditional traffic engineering approaches often fall short in meeting diverse Quality of Experience (QoE) requirements under such conditions. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a QoE-driven distribution framework for mixed traffic in Software-Defined Networking (SDN) environments. The framework integrates flow categorization, adaptive path selection, and feedback-based optimization to dynamically allocate resources in alignment with application-level QoE metrics. By prioritizing delay-sensitive flows while ensuring efficient handling of high-volume traffic, the approach achieves balanced performance across heterogeneous service demands. In our 15-RSU Mininet tests under service number = 1 and offered demand = 10 ms, JOGAF attains max end-to-end delays of 415.74 ms, close to the 399.64 ms achieved by DOGA, while reducing the number of active hosts from 5 to 3 compared with DOGA. By contrast, HNOGA exhibits delayed growth of up to 7716.16 ms with 2 working hosts, indicating poorer suitability for latency-sensitive flows. These results indicate that JOGAF achieves near-DOGA latency with substantially lower host activation, offering a practical energy-aware alternative for mixed traffic SDN deployments. Beyond generic communication scenarios, the framework also shows strong potential in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), where SDN-enabled vehicular networks require adaptive, user-centric service quality management. This work highlights the necessity of coupling classical traffic engineering concepts with SDN programmability to address the multifaceted challenges of next-generation networking. Moreover, it establishes a foundation for scalable, adaptive data distribution strategies capable of enhancing user experience while maintaining robustness across dynamic traffic environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Software-Defined Networks and 5G · Image and Video Quality Assessment · Caching and Content Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Traffic Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
School of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Funding
China Postdoctoral Science
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Al Jameel, M., Kanakis, T., Turner, S., Al-Sherbaz, A., and Bhaya, W.S. (2022). A Reinforcement Learning-Based Routing for Real-Time Multimedia Traffic Transmission over Software-Defined Networking. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11152441 ↗
2. A Computationally Intelligent Framework for Traffic Engineering and Congestion Management in Software-Defined Network (SDN)10.1186/s13638-024-02392-2 ↗
3. SDN and NFV for QoE-Driven Multimedia Services Delivery: The Road towards 6G and beyond Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109133 ↗
4. Joint Optimization of Layering and Power Allocation for Scalable VR Video in 6G Networks Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning10.1016/j.sysarc.2025.103401 ↗
5. Li, H., Li, H., Ji, Y., and Wang, Z. (2025). A Multi-Area Software-Defined Vehicular Network Control Plane Deployment Mechanism Oriented to Traffic Prediction. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105545 ↗
6. Enabling Efficient Routing for Traffic Engineering in SDN with Deep Reinforcement Learning10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110220 ↗
7. Tosounidis, V., Pavlidis, G., and Sakellariou, I. (2020, January 2–4). Deep Q-Learning for Load Balancing Traffic in SDN Networks. Proceedings of the 11th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Athens, Greece.10.1145/3411408.3411423 ↗
8. Farahani, R., Tashtarian, F., Erfanian, A., Timmerer, C., Ghanbari, M., and Hellwagner, H. (October, January 28). ES-HAS: An Edge-and SDN-Assisted Framework for HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming. Proceedings of the 31st ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video, Istanbul, Turkey.
9. Liotou, E., Xenakis, D., Georgara, V., Kourouniotis, G., and Merakos, L. (2023). Cache-Enabled Adaptive Video Streaming: A QoE-Based Evaluation Study. Future Internet, 15.10.3390/fi15070221 ↗
10. Minimizing the Maximum Link Utilization for Traffic Engineering in SDN: A Comparative Analysis10.1016/j.procs.2024.12.032 ↗
11. Connection-Density-Aware Satellite-Ground Federated Learning via Asynchronous Dynamic Aggregation10.1016/j.future.2024.02.007 ↗
12. DAI-NET: Toward Communication-Aware Collaborative Training for the Industrial Edge10.1016/j.future.2024.01.027 ↗
13. Quality of Service Management Method in a Heterogeneous Wireless Network Using Big Data Technology and Mobile QoE Application10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102771 ↗
14. Beshley, M., Kryvinska, N., Seliuchenko, M., Beshley, H., Shakshuki, E.M., and Yasar, A.U.H. (2020). End-to-End QoS “Smart Queue” Management Algorithms and Traffic Prioritization Mechanisms for Narrow-Band Internet of Things Services in 4G/5G Networks. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20082324 ↗
15. A Novel Industrial Control Architecture Based on Software-Defined Network10.1177/0020294018784310 ↗
16. Edge Computing vs Centralized Cloud: Impact of Communication Latency on the Energy Consumption of LTE Terminal Nodes10.1016/j.comcom.2022.07.026 ↗
17. MuSC: A Multi-Stage Service Chains Embedding Approach10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102593 ↗
18. A Resilient Routing Strategy Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Urban Emergency Communication Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110898 ↗
19. An Intelligent Fuzzy-Based Routing Scheme for Software-Defined Vehicular Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107837 ↗
20. QoE-Aware Edge Server Placement in Mobile Edge Computing Using an Enhanced Genetic Algorithm
21. Joint Optimization of Link Scheduling and Resource Allocation in Cooperative Vehicular Networks10.1186/s13638-015-0392-4 ↗