Comparative Study of Cross-System Microseismic Energy Calculation and Fusion Methods—A Case Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Microseismic monitoring technology serves as a vital tool for assessing the stability of coal and rock masses. The precision of energy calculations and the ability to integrate data across different systems have a direct impact on the effectiveness of early warning systems for hazards such as rockburst. This study utilized the 6306 working face of Shandong Energy Group’s Dongtan Coal Mine as its experimental site to address data inconsistencies caused by variations in sensor responses, localization algorithms, and energy calculation methods among microseismic monitoring systems. Two microseismic monitoring platforms, designated as System A and System B, were deployed to conduct a comparative and integrative study of cross-system energy calculations. The optimization of sensor layout facilitated a comprehensive analysis of the differences between the two systems in terms of P-wave arrival times, amplitude–frequency characteristics, and localization accuracy. Results indicated that System A achieved significantly lower localization errors, with an average of 49 m, compared to System B’s average of 70 m. Substantial differences were also found in waveform amplitude and dominant frequency, with a correlation coefficient of only 0.59 between the two systems. To bridge these disparities, an energy calculation method based on the displacement gauge function was developed. By fitting a localized gauge function R(Δ) and incorporating empirical coefficients, the energy calculation outputs of both systems were harmonized. Validation experiments demonstrated that the linear correlation coefficient of energy calculations between Systems A and B increased to 0.977 under the new method, confirming its effectiveness for data unification. This research provides critical theoretical and technical guidance for integrating microseismic data across systems and establishing unified early warning standards, thus advancing the monitoring and prediction of dynamic hazards in mining environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yankuang Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jining 273500, China
School of Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Coal Industry Management Department, Shandong Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China
Funding
the National Science and Technology Major Projects · the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Jiangsu Basic Research Program · the Shandong Energy Group 2022 Project with Chief Scientist System · the Taishan Leading Talent Project in Industry
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu, F., Wang, Y., Kou, M., and Liang, C. (2024). Applications of Microseismic Monitoring Technique in Coal Mines: A State-of-the-Art Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14041509 ↗
2. Dong, L., Zhu, H., Yan, F., and Bi, S. (2023). Risk Field of Rock Instability using Microseismic Monitoring Data in Deep Mining. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23031300 ↗
3. Microseismic Monitoring and Assessment of Segmented Hydraulic Fracturing of Horizontal Wells in Coal Seam Roofs
4. Cyclic Pressure Step and Mechanism on Working Face Based on Microseismic and Mining Pressure Monitoring
5. Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Coal Seam using Ground Microseismic Monitoring and Source Location10.1007/s00603-023-03577-9 ↗
6. Fractures Characterization in Mining Field Considering Seismic Location Accuracy and its Application on Pre-warning Coal Burst Hazards
7. Zhao, J.S., Zhao, Y.M., Li, P.X., Chen, C.F., Zhang, J.C., and Chen, J.H. (2023). Microseismic Monitoring of the Fracture Nucleation Mechanism and Early Warning for Cavern Rock Masses. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11092800 ↗
8. Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Li, Z., and Wang, P. (2023). Investigation of Microseismic Monitoring of and Precursor Information on Roof Collapse. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011307 ↗
9. Occurrence Mechanism Monitoring and Prevention Technology of Rockburst in Coal Mines
10. An Early Warning Method and Application of Water Inrush from Coal Mining Floor Based on the Correlation Effect Between Daily Cumulative Microseismic Indicators and Water Level
11. Research Progress and Prospects of Coal and Gas Outburst and Composite Dynamic Disaster Warning Systems in China
12. Occurrence Law and Classification Prevention of Rockburst in Coal Mines of Shanxi Province
13. Full-time and Space Early-Warning Method for Floor Water Inrush in Working Face Based on Microseismic Monitoring
14. Joint Monitoring of Surface and Underground Microseismic Monitoring Technology in Rockburst Coal Mine
15. Technology and Application of BSN Microseismic Monitoring in Mines
16. Research on High-precision Wireless Microseismic Monitoring Technology Based on 5G Communication Network
17. Application of Microseismic Monitoring System for Coal Mines to the Prevention and Control of Water Disasters on Working Face Roofs
18. Influence of Weak Earthquake on Rockburst Risk in Adjacent Mine Field
19. Study on Optimization of Vertical Location Accuracy of Seismic Source Based on Joint Monitoring of Surface and Underground Microseismic Monitoring
20. Risk Evaluation and Early Warning for Rockburst Based on Microseismic Activity Index of Geological Layers
21. Mine Tremor Focal Mechanism: An Essential Element for Recognising the Process of Mine Working Destruction10.2478/s11600-011-0036-y ↗
22. Cloud Platform of Rock-burst Intelligent Risk Assessment and Multi-parameter Monitoring and Early Warning
23. Multi-parameter Integrated Early Warning Model and an Intelligent Identification Cloud Platform of Rockburst
24. Research and Application of Comprehensive Monitoring and Early Warning Platform for Coal Mine Rockburst
25. Geiger, L. (1912). Probability Method for the Determination of Earth Quake Epicenters from Arrival Time Only. Bulletin of St. Louis University, St. Louis University.
26. A General Method for Determination of Earthquake Parameters by Computer
27. Cross-related Microseismic Location Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization and the Double-difference Location Method of Jointed Coal Rock Mass10.1080/17455030.2021.2009151 ↗
28. Han, Y., Zeng, F., Fu, L., and Zheng, F. (2025). GA-PSO Algorithm for Microseismic Source Location. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15041841 ↗
29. A Method for High-accuracy Localization of Microseismic Sources in Mines Based on Finite Element Simulation
30. Calculation Method for the Seismic Wave Energy of Microseismic Hypocenters
31. A Method for Micro-seismic Energy Expressions in Mine
32. Dou, L., He, X., Wang, E., and Cao, S. (1999). The Mechanism of Rock Burst and Seismic Waves and Its Prevention. J. Min. Saf. Eng., 199–203.
33. Optimization Algorithm of Network Configuration for Improving Location Accuracy of Microseism in Coal Mine
34. Study on Local Magnitude Deviations in Fujian
35. Study on the Calibration Function and Azimuth Correction of Hebei Local Earthquake Magnitude
36. (2017). The Specification of Earthquake Magnitude (Standard No. GB 17740-2017).