Analysis of Meat Juice Leakage from Refrigerated Culinary Pork, Beef, and Chicken Meat into the Unit Packaging: Estimation of Reference Limits for Distribution and Retail in Poland
Source abstract
Abstract
Meat juice leakage is a natural phenomenon, evident in culinary meat packaging, and is a key indicator of meat quality. This study aimed to evaluate the amount of meat juice leakage into the packaging during culinary pork, beef, and chicken storage in a refrigerated display case simulating retail conditions (2–4 °C, 12 days). The study included 1800 high-quality culinary meat samples, i.e., free of technological defects, packaged in vacuum (VAC) and modified atmosphere (MAP), with and without absorbent pads, obtained from meat processing plants. On the 12th day of storage, the leakage was determined in the meat portions using the gravimetric method, and pH and color (CIEL*a*b*) were measured using instrumental methods. It was found that the leakage level from culinary meat ranged from 2.10% for pork shoulder VAC to 10.70% for pork loin VAC, in slices, being influenced (p < 0.01) by each grouping factor: meat type, meat cut, and package type. Regardless of the packaging method, culinary chicken meat had a lower pH (p < 0.001) than pork and beef. The study also found significant negative correlations between pH and leakage in most culinary meat cuts, as shown by the results for ham VAC (r = −0.66), ham MAP (r = −0.59), and heel of round MAP (r = −0.50). Among meat color parameters, the most significant variability was observed for lightness (L*), whose mean value differed significantly depending on the type of meat (p < 0.001) and the meat cut (p < 0.001), and within the same culinary cut—except beef tenderloin and chicken breast fillet–also depending on the type of packaging (p < 0.05). Based on the results obtained in this study, covering a large number of culinary meat samples, it was suggested that recommended leakage levels, i.e., those that raise no concerns regarding meat quality, could range from 2% for shoulder and pork neck (both VAC) to just over 10% for tenderloin slices (packaged using the MAP and VAC methods). Our findings can be used by both meat producers and quality control authorities to monitor the quality of culinary meat, e.g., they may help determine maximum permissible leakage levels and design meat packaging methods to reduce leakage. Ultimately, these measures will enhance consumer confidence in meat production and quality. Additionally, the results systematize knowledge on meat leakage, providing valuable insights for scientists who support producers and retailers in their efforts to minimize this issue.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Meat and Animal Product Quality · Food Supply Chain Traceability · Food Safety and Hygiene
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Food Sciences, Department of Food Technology and Assessment, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 166, 02-787 Warszawa, Poland
Funding
association Polskie Mięso
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Factors Affecting the Water Holding Capacity of Red Meat Products: A Review of Recent Research Advances10.1080/10408390601177647 ↗
2. Warner, R. (2014). Measurement of meat quality. Measurements of Water-Holding Capacity and Color: Objective and Subjective. Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-384731-7.00210-5 ↗
3. Meat and Meat Losses: Influence on Meat Quality
4. Charakterystyka Wybranych Systemów Pakowania Mięsa w Odniesieniu Do Preferencji Konsumentów i Aspektów Ekonomicznych
5. Effects of Pork Quality Types, Packaging, and Degree of Doneness on Trained Sensory and Instrumental Tenderness, Color, and Consumer Perception
6. Aktualne problemy jakości rynkowego mięsa kulinarnego w opinii konsumentów
7. Masa mięsa netto—Analiza prawna i metodologiczna
8. Huff-Lonergan, E. (2009). Fresh Meat Water-Holding Capacity. Improving the Sensory and Nutritional Quality of Fresh Meat, Elsevier.10.1201/9781439829165.ch6 ↗
9. Relationship between water-holding capacity and intramuscular fat content in Japanese commercial pork loin10.5713/ajas.17.0640 ↗
10. Pas, M.F., Everts, M.E., and Haagsman, H.P. (2004). Water-holding capacity of meat. Muscle Development of Livestock Animals: Physiology, Genetics and Meat Quality, CABI Publishing.10.1079/9780851998114.0000 ↗
11. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022 ↗
12. Effects of Test Conditions on the Water Holding Capacity of Meat by a Centrifugal Method10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80012-3 ↗
13. What is meat? A perspective from the American Meat Science Association10.2527/af.2017.0436 ↗
14. Theoretical Aspects of Water-Holding in Meat10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.038 ↗
15. Contrasting Changes in Strongly and Weakly Bound Hydration Water of a Protein upon Denaturation10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c02970 ↗
16. Warriss, P.D. (2010). Post-Mortem Changes in Muscle and Its Conversion into Meat. Meat Science, CABI Digital Library. [2nd ed.]. Available online: https://cabidigitallibrary.org.10.1079/9781845935931.0064 ↗
17. Wajdzik, J. (2025, September 01). Aspekty Jakościowe Pakowanego Mięsa Kulinarnego. Ogólnopolski Informator Masarski. Available online: https://informatormasarski.pl/maszyny-i-technologie/aspekty-jakosciowe-pakowanego-miesa-kulinarnego/.
18. Warner, R.D. (2023). The Eating Quality of Meat: IV—Water Holding Capacity and Juiciness. Lawrie’s Meat Science, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-85408-5.00008-X ↗
19. Zastosowanie metody komputerowej analizy obrazu do oznaczenia zdolności utrzymania wody własnej przez mięso
20. Determinants of Broiler Chicken Meat Quality and Factors Affecting Them: A Review10.1007/s13197-017-2789-z ↗
21. Past, Current and Potential Utilisation of Active and Intelligent Packaging Systems for Meat and Muscle-Based Products: A Review10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.024 ↗
22. Wpływ Sposobu Pakowania Na Zachowanie Barwy Mięsa i Przetworów z Mięsa Wieprzowego
23. Instrumental meat quality of veal calves reared under three management systems and color evolution of meat stored in three packaging systems10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.09.012 ↗
24. Effect of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Shelf Life and Bacterial Community of Roast Duck Meat10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109645 ↗
25. Determination of creatine, creatinine, free amino acid and heterocyclic aromatic amine contents of plain beef and chicken juices10.1007/s13197-020-04875-8 ↗
26. Liu, J., Ellies-Oury, M.-P., Stoyanchev, T., and Hocquette, J.-F. (2022). Consumer Perception of Beef Quality and How to Control, Improve and Predict It? Focus on Eating Quality. Foods, 11.10.3390/foods11121732 ↗
27. Measurement of Drip Loss in Alpaca (Vicugna Pacos) Meat Using Different Techniques and Sample Weights10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.012 ↗
28. Variation in the terminology and methodologies applied to the analysis of water holding capacity in meat research10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108510 ↗
29. Drip loss sampling in porcine m. longissimus dorsi10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00106-7 ↗
30. Comparison of different methods for determination of drip loss and their relationships to meat quality and carcass characteristics in pigs10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.007 ↗
31. The Effect of Meat Sample Preparation on the Results of Drip Loss and Cooking Loss Analysis
32. (2025, September 01). NSA Centralna Baza Orzeczeń Sądów Administracyjnych, III SA/Po 181/22- Wyrok WSA w Poznaniu, 181/22, Available online: https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl/doc/8F1459B16D.
33. (2010). Meat and Meat Products—Determination of Fat, Protein and Water Content—Near Infrared Transmission Spectrometry (NIT) Method Using Calibration on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) (Standard No. Polish Standard PN-A-82109:2010).
34. The application of the near-infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) technique in assessment of chemical composition of the lamb meat
35. Wagoner, M., Reyes, T., Zorn, V., Coursen, M., Corbitt, K., Wilborn, B., Starkey, C., Brandebourg, T., Belk, A., and Bonner, T. (2022). Vacuum Packaging Maintains Fresh Characteristics of Previously Frozen Beef Steaks during Simulated Retail Display. Foods, 11.10.3390/foods11193012 ↗
36. (2025, September 01). International Standard ISO 2917. Meat and Meat Products—Measurement of pH—Reference Method, 1–5. Available online: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/24785/9861ea639264453ea88995b72d9c4ba5/ISO-2917-1999.pdf.
37. Pork as a Source of Nutrients in a Human Diet—Comparison of Meat Obtained from Conventional and Organic Systems Offered in the Polish Market10.1016/j.nfs.2024.100199 ↗
38. (2025, September 01). American Meat Science Association. AMSA Meat Color Measurement Guidelines. 2012. Available online: https://meatscience.org/docs/default-source/publications-resources/hot-topics/2012_12_meat_clr_guide.pdf.
39. Application of Student’s t-Test, Analysis of Variance, and Covariance10.4103/aca.ACA_94_19 ↗
40. Pearson Correlation and Multiple Correlation Analyses of the Animal Fat S-Parameter10.18421/TEM131-15 ↗
41. Cheung, P.C.K. (2014). Chemical Composition of Meat and Meat Products. Handbook of Food Chemistry, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-41609-5 ↗
42. Soren, N.M., and Biswas, A.K. (2020). Methods for Nutritional Quality Analysis of Meat. Meat Quality Analysis, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-819233-7.00002-1 ↗
43. Arshad, M.S. (2018). Nutritional Composition of Meat. Meat Science and Nutrition, InTech.10.5772/intechopen.71954 ↗
44. James, S., and James, C. (2008). Raw Material Selection: Meat and Poultry. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Chilled Foods. A Comprehensive Guide, Woodhead Publishing. [3rd ed.]. Martyn Brown; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Chilled Foods.10.1533/9781845694883.1.61 ↗
45. Measuring Water Holding Capacity in Poultry Meat10.1016/j.psj.2024.103577 ↗
46. Jakość technologiczna i tensoryczna tadliwego mięsa wieprzowego
47. Kaić, A., Janječić, Z., Žanetić, A., Kelava Ugarković, N., and Potočnik, K. (2021). EZ-DripLoss Assessment in Chicken Breast Meat Using Different Sample Areas, Fiber Orientation, and Measurement Intervals. Animals, 11.10.3390/ani11041095 ↗
48. Drip loss assessment by different analytical methods and their relationships with pork quality classification
49. Nair, M.N., and Mancini, R.A. (2024). Packaging—Modified and Controlled Atmosphere. Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-85125-1.00095-8 ↗
50. Pakowanie mięsa w warunkach zmodykikowanej atmosfery i próżni. (meat packing in modified atmosphere and vacuum conditions)
51. Shelf-Life Extension of Fresh and Processed Meat Products by Various Packaging Applications10.20909/kopast.2018.24.2.57 ↗
52. Effect of MAP, Vacuum Skin-Pack and Combined Packaging Methods on Physicochemical Properties of Beef Steaks Stored up to 12 Days10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.034 ↗
53. Evaluation of Three Vacuum Packaging Methods for Retail Beef Loin Cuts10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.030 ↗
54. Reyes, T.M., Wagoner, M.P., Zorn, V.E., Coursen, M.M., Wilborn, B.S., Bonner, T., Brandebourg, T.D., Rodning, S.P., and Sawyer, J.T. (2022). Vacuum Packaging Can Extend Fresh Color Characteristics of Beef Steaks during Simulated Display Conditions. Foods, 11.10.3390/foods11040520 ↗
55. Assessing the Variability in Camel and Beef Meat Quality: Implications for Consumer Acceptance10.21608/bvmj.2025.345778.1911 ↗
56. Quality Changes of Chicken Breast Meat Packaged in a Normal and in a Modified Atmosphere10.3382/japr/pfy004 ↗
57. The Effect of Packaging Systems on Selected Quality Characteristics of Poultry Meat10.21005/asp.2019.18.2.01 ↗
58. (2025, September 01). Ustawa z Dnia 7 Maja 2009 r. o Towarach Paczkowanych (Act on Prepackaged Goods), Dz.U. 2009 nr 91 poz. 740, pp. 1–32, Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20090910740.