journal article·2025-10-21Open access

Integrating Industry 4.0 Technologies into 8D Methodologies: A Case Study in the Automotive Industry

Alexandru-Vasile Oancea, Nadia Ionescu, Corneliu Rontescu, Laurentiu-Mihai Ionescu, Agnieszka Misztal, Ana-Maria Bogatu, Dumitru-Titi Cicic, Valentin Pirvu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

This paper presents the application of the 8D method to a case study in the automotive industry, combined with the development of a pilot framework that integrates Industry 4.0 technologies—Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and advanced IT tools. Unlike traditional 8D implementations, the proposed solution introduces several innovations: (i) AI-based complaint analysis with automated keyword detection and classification and localization of batches in the warehouses achieving a 100% accuracy rate in categorizing root causes; (ii) IoT-enabled non-invasive monitoring of production parameters for tests and logs, reducing fault rate to 0 for current case study; (iii) digital cataloging and storage of corrective and preventive actions, improving retrieval speed of past solutions by 300 times (from 300 min to less than 1 min); and (iv) automated reporting tools, cutting the report preparation time from hours to minutes. Through these contributions, the system enhances both responsiveness and prevention, leading to an observed 100% reduction in fault recurrence associated with current case study and an estimated 75% decrease in customer complaints regarding defects occurring throughout the production sector where the pilot was implemented. In addition to the practical improvements, this work extends the literature on digitalized quality management by demonstrating how the 8D methodology can be effectively re-engineered with Industry 4.0 components. Comparative analysis against the enterprise’s conventional 8D system and against recent alternative approaches confirms that our framework provides measurable benefits in the speed, accuracy, and sustainability of problem-solving processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Doctoral School, Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Robotic, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Faculty of Mechanics and Technology, Pitești University Centre, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Faculty of Electronics, Communications and Computers, Pitești University Centre, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independenței, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Risk and Quality Management Department, Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 2J Rychlewski Street, 60-965 Poznan, Poland

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Solving Manufacturing Problems with 8D Methodology: A Case Study of Leakage Current in a Production
2. Visualization Concept of Automotive Quality Management System Standard10.3390/standards2020017 ↗
3. (2025, July 17). IATF 16949 GM Customer Specific Requirements—Effective 1 March 2025. Available online: https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/IATF-16949-GM-Customer-Specific-Requirements-October-2025.pdf.
4. (2025, July 17). Ford Motor Company Customer Specific Requirements for IATF 16949:2016—Effective 23 June 2025. Available online: https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ford-IATF-CSR_June-2025-Release-FINAL.pdf.
5. Quality Improvement of the Forging Process Using Pareto Analysis and 8D Methodology in Automotive Manufacturing: A Case Study10.3390/standards3010008 ↗
6. 8Ds method of problem solving within automotive industry: Tools used and comparison with DMAIC10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.383 ↗
7. Enache, I.-C., Chivu, O.R., Rugescu, A.-M., Ionita, E., and Radu, I.V. (2023). Reducing the Scrap Rate on a Production Process Using Lean Six Sigma Methodology. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11041295 ↗
8. Chen, P.S., Chen, J.C.M., Shen, B.M., and Chen, G.Y.H. (2025). Implementation of Ford 8D in Improving Efficiencies of Wafer Testers: A Case Study. Eng. Manag. J., 1–13.10.1080/10429247.2025.2478669 ↗
9. A review on 8D problem solving process
10. Reducing the defects and improving the quality of manufacturing product (CT wheel/crain part) using 8D problem solving tool
11. Kempel, M., Richter, R., Deuse, J., Schmid, S., and Schulte, L. (2023, January 28–30). Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Interactive Problem Solving with the 8D Method. Proceedings of the Smart Systems Integration Conference and Exhibition (SSI), Brugge, Belgium.10.1109/SSI58917.2023.10387962 ↗
12. Application of 8D methodology: An approach to reduce failures in automotive industry10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.106019 ↗
13. Kovács, T.A., Stadler, R.G., and Daruka, N. (2025). Tools for a Root Cause Analysis for Safety–Critical Components Areview. The Impact of the Energy Dependency on Critical Infrastructure Protection, Proceedings of the ICCECIP 2024, Budapest, Hungary, 7–8 November 2024, Springer. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications.10.1007/978-3-031-78544-3 ↗
14. Proposal for software management solution to prevent potential issues
15. Yao, L., Huang, H., and Chen, S.H. (2020). Product quality detection through manufacturing process based on sequential patterns considering deep semantic learning and process rules. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8070751 ↗
16. Categorization of customer complaints in food industry using machine learning approaches
17. Xie, T., and Yao, X. (2023). Smart logistics warehouse moving-object tracking based on YOLOv5 and DeepSORT. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13179895 ↗
18. Machine learning–based automated image processing for quality management in industrial Internet of Things10.1177/1550147719883551 ↗
19. Quality 4.0: Results from a systematic literature review10.1108/TQM-01-2023-0018 ↗
20. Enhancement of Customer Complaints: Digitalization of Synchronous Model for Problem-Solving of Manufacturing Complaints10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.214 ↗
21. Pietsch, D., Matthes, M., Wieland, U., Ihlenfeldt, S., and Munkelt, T. (2024). Root cause analysis in industrial manufacturing: A scoping review of current research, challenges and the promises of AI-driven approaches. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 8.10.3390/jmmp8060277 ↗
22. Industrie 4.0 process transformation: Findings from a case study in automotive logistics10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0274 ↗
23. Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Arredondo-Soto, K.C., García-Alcaraz, J.L., and Macías, E.J. (2020). Improving a Manufacturing Process Using the 8Ds Method. A Case Study in a Manufacturing Company. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072433 ↗
24. Investigation and implementation of 8D methodology in a manufacturing system10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.273 ↗
25. Using the Ishikawa diagram for problem analysis in the laser cutting process10.33727/JRISS.2024.2.12:109-118 ↗