journal article·2025-10-21Open access

Implementing Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing and Lean Principles Towards Efficiency and Quality Improvement in Manufacturing Welding Processes

Chowdhury Md. Irtiza, Bishal Silwal, Kamran Kardel, Hossein Taheri

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

Welding-based manufacturing and joining processes are extensively used in various areas of industrial production. While welding has been used as a primary method of joining in many applications, its capability to fabricate metal components such as the Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) method should not be undermined. WAAM is a promising method for producing large metal parts, but it is still prone to defects such as porosity that can reduce structural reliability. To ensure these defects are found and measured in a consistent way, inspection methods must be tied directly to code-based acceptance limits. In this work, a three-pass WAAM joint specimen was made in a welded-joint configuration using robotic GMAW-based deposition. This setup provided a stable surface for Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) while still preserving WAAM process conditions. The specimen, which was intentionally seeded with porosity, was divided into five zones and inspected using the 6 dB drop method for defect length and amplitude-based classification, with AWS D1.5 serving as the reference code. The results showed that porosity was not uniform across the bead. Zones 1 and 3 contained the longest clusters (15 mm and 16.5 mm in length) and exceeded AWS length thresholds, while amplitude-based classification suggested they were less critical than other regions. This difference shows the risk of relying on only one criterion. By embedding these results in a DMAIC (Define–Measure–Analyze–Improve–Control) workflow, the inspection outcomes were linked to likely causes such as unstable shielding and cooling effects. Overall, the study demonstrates a code-referenced, dual-criteria approach that can strengthen quality control for WAAM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts10.1007/s00170-011-3878-1 ↗
2. Numerical simulation of WAAM process by a GMAW weld pool model10.1007/s40194-018-0556-z ↗
3. A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: Properties, defects and quality improvement10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001 ↗
4. A study on power-controlled wire-arc additive manufacturing using a data-driven surrogate model10.1007/s00170-021-07358-y ↗
5. A thermo-capillary-gravity model for geometrical analysis of single-bead wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM)10.1007/s00170-020-05647-6 ↗
6. Venturini, G., Montevecchi, F., Scippa, A., and Campatelli, G. (2016, January 4–6). Optimization of WAAM deposition patterns for T-crossing features. Proceedings of the 5th CIRP Global Web Conference Research and Innovation for Future Production, Patras, Greece.10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.043 ↗
7. Liberini, M., Astarita, A., Campatelli, G., Scippa, A., Montevecchi, F., Venturini, G., Durante, M., Boccarusso, L., Minutolo, F.M.C., and Squillace, A. (2016, January 20–22). Selection of optimal process parameters for wire arc additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the 10th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering—CIRP ICME’16, Ischia, Italy.
8. Evaluation of wire arc additive manufacturing for large-sized components in naval applications10.1007/s40194-017-0536-8 ↗
9. Gardner, L., Kyvelou, P., Herbert, G., and Buchanan, C. (2020). Testing and initial verification of the world’s first metal 3D printed bridge. J. Constr. Steel Res., 172.10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106233 ↗
10. Macrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Si, Al-Mg and Al-Mn Aluminum alloys Produced by Electric Arc Additive Growth10.1007/s11041-019-00351-z ↗
11. Arc-welding based additive manufacturing for body reinforcement in automotive engineering10.1007/s40194-020-00959-3 ↗
12. Effect of Solidification Defects and HAZ Softening on the Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of a Wire Arc Additive-Manufactured Low-Carbon Low-Alloy Steel Part10.1007/s11837-019-03773-5 ↗
13. Arana, M., Ukar, E., Rodriguez, I., Iturrioz, A., and Alvarez, P. (2021). Strategies to Reduce Porosity in Al-Mg WAAM Parts and Their Impact on Mechanical Properties. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11030524 ↗
14. Jovanovic, M., Grum, J., and Uran, M. (2008, January 25–28). Influence of Lack-of-Fusion Defects on Load Capacity of MAG Welded Joints. Proceedings of the 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing (WCNDT), Shanghai, China.
15. Fu, R., Tang, S., Lu, J., Cui, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, H., Xu, T., Chen, Z., and Liu, C. (2021). Hot-wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminum alloy with reduced porosity and high deposition rate. Mater. Des., 199.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109370 ↗
16. Mitigation of Thermal Distortion in Wire Arc Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Part Using Active Interpass Cooling10.1080/13621718.2019.1580439 ↗
17. Derekar, K., Lawrence, J., Melton, G., Addison, A., Zhang, X., and Xu, L. (2019). Influence of Interpass Temperature on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) of Aluminium Alloy Components. MATEC Web of Conferences 269, EDP Sciences.10.1051/matecconf/201926905001 ↗
18. Criticality of porosity defects on the fatigue performance of wire + arc additive manufactured titanium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.017 ↗
19. Seow, C.E., Zhang, J., Coules, H.E., Wu, G., Jones, C., Ding, J., and Williams, S. (2020). Effect of crack-like defects on the fracture behaviour of Wire + Arc Additively Manufactured nickel-base Alloy 718. Addit. Manuf., 36.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101578 ↗
20. Reduction Analysis of Welding Defects using Lean Six Sigma and DMAIC application-A case Study10.14445/23488360/IJME-V10I4P103 ↗
21. Hossain, S., Taheri, H., Pudasaini, N., Reichenbach, A., and Silwal, B. (2020, January 16–19). Ultrasonic Nondestructive Testing for In-Line Monitoring of Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). Proceedings of the ASME 2020 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Online.10.1115/IMECE2020-23317 ↗
22. Taheri, H., Ladd, K.M., Delfanian, F., and Du, J. (2015, January 13–19). Phased Array Ultrasonic Technique Parametric Evaluation for Composite Materials. Proceedings of the International Mechanical Congress & Exposition, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1115/IMECE2014-36945 ↗
23. Williams, C., Lappin, E., and Taheri, H. (2024, January 17–21). Assessment of Process Induced Welding Flaws in Structural Steel Members Using Phased Array Ultrasonic Nondestructive Testing. Proceedings of the ASME 2024 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Portland, OR, USA.10.1115/IMECE2024-145049 ↗
24. Rodrigues, T., Duarte, V., Miranda, R., Santos, T., and Oliveira, J. (2019). Current Status and Perspectives on Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM). Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12071121 ↗
25. Society, A.W. (2020). Bridge Welding Code, American Welding Society.
26. Irtiza, C.M., and Taheri, H. (2025, January 24). Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing and Characterization of Flaws in Structural Welding in Compliance with AWS D1. 5. Proceedings of the GS4 Georgia Southern Student Scholars Symposium, 165, Statesboro, GA, USA.
27. (2020, September 01). Evident-Weld Series Probes. Evident. Available online: https://ims.evidentscientific.com/en/probes/phased-array/weld-series.
28. Kishoni, D., and Workman, G.L. (2007). Nondestructive Testing Handbook, ASNT.
29. Ultrasonic phased array inspection of a WAAM sample with intentionally embedded defects10.1784/insi.2019.61.3.144 ↗