Explainable machine learning-based fatigue assessment of 316L stainless steel fabricated by laser-powder bed fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) and in particular laser-powder bed fusion has become a popular manufacturing techniques in recent years due to its significant advantages; however, the mechanical behavior of AM components often varies from components fabricated using conventional processes. For example, the fatigue behavior of components made by AM processes is heavily influenced by process-related defects and residual stresses in addition to applied stress amplitudes, stress ratio and surface conditions. Accounting for the interaction of these effects in fatigue design is difficult by means of traditional fatigue assessment concepts. Machine learning algorithms offer a possibility to account for such interactions and are easily applied once trained and validated. In this study, machine learning algorithms based on gradient boosted trees with the SHapley Additive exPlanation framework are used to predict defect location and fatigue life of additive manufactured AISI 316L specimens in as-built and post-treated manufacturing states, while also facilitating the understanding of the importance and interactions of various influencing factors. • Fatigue strength tests of additively manufactured AISI 316L specimens. • Prediction of fatigue life and failure initiation location using machine learning. • Ranking of influencing parameters and investigation of their interactions. • Analysis of mean stress and residual stress effect on fatigue strength and lifetime.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. 2021
2. A review of additive manufacturing
3. Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured stainless steel 316L10.3390/ma16010065 ↗
4. Metal additive manufacturing by laser-powder bed fusion: Guidelines for process optimisation10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100473 ↗
5. Numerical and experimental investigations on laser melting of stainless steel 316L metal powders10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.04.001 ↗
6. Microstructure and corrosion resistance of a type 316L stainless steel10.1016/S0010-938X(97)00143-1 ↗
7. Additive manufacturing of AISI 316L stainless steel: A review10.3390/met13081370 ↗
8. High melting point metals welding by concentrated solar energy10.1016/j.solener.2013.05.019 ↗
9. Comparison of different additive manufacturing methods for 316l stainless steel10.3390/ma14216504 ↗
10. Metal additive manufacturing: a review10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
11. Porosity in wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys
12. Optimization of surface roughness and dimensional accuracy in LPBF additive manufacturing10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107246 ↗
13. Feature-based volumetric defect classification in metal additive manufacturing10.1038/s41467-022-34122-x ↗
14. Residual stress in laser powder bed fusion
15. Prediction of microstructure, residual stress, and deformation in laser powder bed fusion process10.1007/s00466-017-1528-7 ↗
16. Fatigue failure mechanisms for AlSi10Mg manufactured by L-PBF under axial and torsional loads: The role of defects and residual stresses10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106903 ↗
17. Fatigue strength of PBF-LB/M and wrought 316L stainless steel: effect of post-treatment and cyclic mean stress10.1111/ffe.13552 ↗
18. The effect of post-processing heat treatment on the microstructure, residual stress and mechanical properties of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel10.1016/j.msea.2021.141611 ↗
19. Post processing of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel by multi-jet polishing method10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.054 ↗
20. Predicting fatigue life of metal LPBF components by combining a large fatigue database for different sample conditions with novel simulation strategies
21. Study on fatigue behavior and crack propagation life of longitudinal fillet welded lap joint10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107301 ↗
22. Simultaneous effects of cutting depth and tool overhang on the vibration behavior of cutting tool and high-cycle fatigue behavior of product: Experimental research on the turning machine10.1007/s00170-022-10012-w ↗
23. Fatigue life evaluation of al-GFRP bonded lap joints under four-point bending using strain-life criteria10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103338 ↗
24. Fatigue behavior of low-temperature hot isostatic pressed electron beam powder bed fusion manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171086 ↗
25. Effect of welding processes on the fatigue behaviour of ultra-high strength steel butt-welded joints10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108845 ↗
26. Experimental and numerical study of fatigue behavior of bridge weathering steel Q345qDNH10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.06.016 ↗
27. Fatigue life prediction of cast aluminum alloy based on porosity characteristics10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102774 ↗
28. Machine learning-based fatigue life prediction of metal materials: Perspectives of physics-informed and data-driven hybrid methods
29. A machine-learning fatigue life prediction approach of additively manufactured metals10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107508 ↗
30. Machine learning based fatigue life prediction with effects of additive manufacturing process parameters for printed SS 316L10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941 ↗
31. Fatigue-life prediction of additively manufactured metals by continuous damage mechanics (CDM)-informed machine learning with sensitive features10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107147 ↗
32. Machine learning based very-high-cycle fatigue life prediction of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106764 ↗
33. High cycle fatigue life prediction of laser additive manufactured stainless steel: A machine learning approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105194 ↗
34. Application of machine learning algorithms for the optimization of the fabrication process of steel springs to improve their fatigue performance10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106785 ↗
35. The potency of defects on fatigue of additively manufactured metals10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107185 ↗
36. Correlation of residual stress, hardness and surface roughness with crack initiation and fatigue strength of surface treated additive manufactured AlSi10Mg: Experimental and machine learning approaches10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.193 ↗
37. On the efficiency of machine learning for fatigue assessment of post-processed additively manufactured AlSi10Mg10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106841 ↗
38. Defect criticality analysis on fatigue life of L-PBF 17-4 PH stainless steel via machine learning10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107018 ↗
39. Machine-learning-based investigation into the effect of defect/inclusion on fatigue behavior in steels10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106597 ↗
40. Machine learning model interpretability using SHAP values: Application to a seismic facies classification task
41. Shapley additive explanation on machine learning predictions of fatigue lifetimes in piston aluminum alloys under different manufacturing and loading conditions10.3221/IGF-ESIS.68.24 ↗
42. Comparison of machine learning and stress concentration factors-based fatigue failure prediction in small-scale butt-welded joints10.1111/ffe.13800 ↗
43. Prediction of fatigue failure in small-scale butt-welded joints with explainable machine learning10.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.019 ↗
44. Determination of the influence of a stress-relief heat treatment and additively manufactured surface on the fatigue behavior of selectively laser melted AISI 316L by using efficient short-time procedures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105301 ↗
45. Grain boundary sensitization and desensitization during the ageing of 316L (N) austenitic stainless steels10.1007/BF01130196 ↗
46. Material defects as the basis of fatigue design10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.001 ↗
47. Stable learning establishes some common ground between causal inference and machine learning10.1038/s42256-022-00445-z ↗
48. Mean stress correction in fatigue design under consideration of welding residual stress10.1007/s40194-020-00852-z ↗
49. Fatigue modeling using neural networks: A comprehensive review10.1111/ffe.13640 ↗
50. Fatigue life prediction of aluminum alloy via knowledge-based machine learning10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106716 ↗
51. Comparative analysis of decision tree classification algorithms
52. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction
53. An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization10.1023/A:1007607513941 ↗
54. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors)10.1214/aos/1016218223 ↗
55. XGBoost optimized by adaptive particle swarm optimization for credit scoring
56. An explainable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital amputation rate of patients with diabetic foot ulcer10.1111/iwj.13691 ↗
57. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
58. Application of XGboost algorithm in bearing fault diagnosis
59. Extreme gradient boosting with squared logistic loss function
60. Chen T, Guestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 2016, p. 785–94.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
61. Estimation of high cycle fatigue life of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V using data analytics10.1016/j.prostr.2023.06.015 ↗
62. The advantages of the matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗
63. Stoica · 2023
64. Explainable machine learning for understanding and predicting geometry and defect types in Fe-Ni alloys fabricated by laser metal deposition additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.137 ↗
65. Effect of residual stress on fatigue strength of 316L stainless steel produced by laser powder bed fusion process
66. Introduction to metal fatigue, and no.:
67. An overview of overfitting and its solutions
68. Overfitting in prediction models–is it a problem only in high dimensions?10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.011 ↗
69. A comparison of MCC and CEN error measures in multi-class prediction10.1371/journal.pone.0041882 ↗
70. Fatigue of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: The influence of porosity and surface roughness10.1111/ffe.13077 ↗
71. Defect tolerant fatigue assessment of AM materials: Size effect and probabilistic prospects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106884 ↗
72. Awd · 2023