A Robotic Gamified Framework for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation
Source abstract
Abstract
Robotic devices have become increasingly important in upper-limb rehabilitation, as they assist therapists, improve treatment efficiency, and enable personalised therapy. However, the lack of standardised protocols and integrative tools limits their widespread adoption and effectiveness. To address these challenges, a robotic framework was developed for upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). The framework is designed to be adaptable to various ROS-compatible collaborative robots with admittance control and potentially adaptable to other types of control, and also integrates kinematic and electrophysiological (EMG) metrics to monitor patient performance and progress. It combines data acquisition through EMG and robot motion sensors, gamification elements to enhance engagement, and configurable robot control modes within a unified software platform. A pilot evaluation with eight healthy subjects performing upper limb movements on an ROS-compatible robot from the UR family demonstrated the feasibility of the framework’s components, including robot control, EMG acquisition and synchronization, gamified interaction, and synchronised data collection. User performance through all levels remained below the controller limits of force and velocity thresholds even in the most resistive damping. These results support the potential of the proposed framework as a flexible, extensible, and integrative tool for upper-limb rehabilitation, providing a foundation for future clinical studies and multi-platform implementations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Human Robotics Group, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690 Alicante, Spain
Funding
GARMOR project · Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Costs and Rehabilitation Use of Stroke Survivors: A Retrospective Study of Medicare Beneficiaries10.1310/tsr1605-309 ↗
2. Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation after Stroke: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial10.1097/NPT.0000000000000295 ↗
3. Kennard, M., Hassan, M., Shimizu, Y., and Suzuki, K. (2024). Max Well-Being: A Modular Platform for the Gamification of Rehabilitation. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1382157 ↗
4. Robot-aided Neurorehabilitation10.1109/86.662623 ↗
5. Robot-assisted Movement Training Compared with Conventional Therapy Techniques for the Rehabilitation of Upper-limb Motor Function after Stroke10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 ↗
6. Design and Control of a Three Degree of Freedom Pneumatic Physiotherapy Robot10.1017/S0263574703005320 ↗
7. Understanding and Treating Arm Movement Impairment after Chronic Brain Injury: Progress with the ARM Guide
8. Zhu, T.L., Klein, J., Dual, S.A., Leong, T.C., and Burdet, E. (2014, January 14–18). ReachMAN2: A Compact Rehabilitation Robot to Train Reaching and Manipulation. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/IROS.2014.6942845 ↗
9. Chiriatti, G., Palmieri, G., and Palpacelli, M.C. (2020). A Framework for the Study of Human-robot Collaboration in Rehabilitation Practices. Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics, Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria Danube Region, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 19 June 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-48989-2_21 ↗
10. An Augmented Reality Interface to Control a Collaborative Robot in Rehab: A Preliminary Usability Evaluation10.3389/fdgth.2023.1078511 ↗
11. Exoskeleton and End-Effector Robots for Upper and Lower Limbs Rehabilitation: Narrative Review
12. Garro, F., Chiappalone, M., Buccelli, S., De Michieli, L., and Semprini, M. (2021). Neuromechanical Biomarkers for Robotic Neurorehabilitation. Front. Neurorobot., 15.10.3389/fnbot.2021.742163 ↗
13. Lencioni, T., Fornia, L., Bowman, T., Marzegan, A., Caronni, A., Turolla, A., Jonsdottir, J., Carpinella, I., and Ferrarin, M. (2021). A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects Induced by Robot-assisted and Usual-care Rehabilitation on Upper Limb Muscle Synergies in Post-stroke Subjects. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-84536-8 ↗
14. Model-based Analysis of Muscle Strength and EMG-force Relation with Respect to Different Patterns of Motor Unit Loss10.1155/2021/5513224 ↗
15. Goffredo, M., Proietti, S., Pournajaf, S., Galafate, D., Ciota, M., Le Pera, D., Posterato, F., and Francesichini, M. (2022). Baseline Robot-measured Kinematic Metrics Predict Discharge Rehabilitation Outcomes in Individuals with Subacute Stroke. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.1012544 ↗
16. A Therapy-driven Gamification Framework for Hand Rehabilitation10.1007/s11257-017-9191-4 ↗
17. Wearable Device for Personalized EMG Feedback-based Treatments10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102472 ↗
18. Gamification in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation10.1007/s12178-022-09797-w ↗
19. Tuah, N.M., Ahmedy, F., Gani, A., and Yong, L.N. (2021). A Survey on Gamification for Health Rehabilitation Care: Applications, Opportunities, and Open Challenges. Information, 12.10.3390/info12020091 ↗
20. Faran, S., Einav, O., Yoeli, D., Kerzhner, M., Geva, D., Magnazi, G., van Kaick, S., and Mauritz, K.-H. (July, January 29). Reo Assessment to Guide the ReoGo Therapy: Reliability and Validity of Novel Robotic Scores. Proceedings of the 2009 Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference, Haifa, Israel.10.1109/ICVR.2009.5174247 ↗
21. (2023, November 19). Exoskeleton Report, “Upper Body Fixed Rehabilitation: Exoskeleton Catalog Category for Upper Body Fixed (or Stationary) Wearable Exoskeletons”. Available online: https://exoskeletonreport.com/product-category/exoskeletoncatalog/medical/upper-body-fixed-rehabilitation/.
22. (2023, November 19). Nexum by Wearable Robotics. Available online: https://nexumrobotics.it/.
23. D’Antonio, E., Galofaro, E., Patane, F., Casadio, M., and Masia, L. (2021, January 12–16). A Dual Arm Haptic Exoskeleton for Dynamically Coupled Manipulation. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Delft, The Netherlands.10.1109/AIM46487.2021.9517707 ↗
24. Who May Benefit From Armeo Power Treatment? A Neurophysiological Approach to Predict Neurorehabilitation Outcomes10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.02.004 ↗
25. Calabrò, R.S. (2024). Translational Neurorehabilitation: Brain, Behavior and Technology, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-63604-2 ↗
26. Hsieh, Y., Lin, K., Wu, C., Shih, T., Li, M., and Chen, C. (2018). Comparison of Proximal versus Distal Upper-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation on Motor Performance after Stroke: A Cluster Controlled Trial. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-20330-3 ↗
27. Zhang, L., Guo, S., and Sun, Q. (2021). An Assist-as-Needed Controller for Passive, Assistant, Active, and Resistive Robot-Aided Rehabilitation Training of the Upper Extremity. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010340 ↗
28. Assistive Robotics for Upper Limb Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Future Prospects10.1186/s10033-024-01056-y ↗
29. Bessler, J., Prange-Lasonder, G.B., Schaake, L., Saenz, J.F., Bidard, C., Fassi, I., Valori, M., Lassen, A.B., and Buurke, J.H. (2021). Safety Assessment of Rehabilitation Robots: A Review Identifying Safety Skills and Current Knowledge Gaps. Front. Robot. AI, 8.10.3389/frobt.2021.602878 ↗
30. Cable Driven Rehabilitation Robots: Comparison of Applications and Control Strategies10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3102107 ↗
31. Mamani, W., Sempere, N., Casanova, A., Morell, V., Jara, C.A., and Ubeda, A. (2024). Upper Limb EMG-based Fatigue Estimation During End Effector Robot-assisted Activities. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation V, Proceedings of the International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation, La Granja, Spain, 4–7 November 2024, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-77584-0_86 ↗
32. Movement Smoothness Changes During Stroke Recovery10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-18-08297.2002 ↗
33. Mahfouz, D.M., Shehata, O.M., Morgan, E.I., and Arrichiello, F. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Control Challenges and Methods in End-Effector Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robots. Robotics, 13.10.3390/robotics13120181 ↗
34. Effects of Robot Viscous Forces on Arm Movements in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Crossover Study10.1186/s12984-020-00782-3 ↗