Microenvironment Under Face Masks and Respirators: Impact of Textile Structure and Material Air Permeability
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the microenvironment under face masks and respirators, focusing on the influence of material and design characteristics on carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, temperature, and relative humidity. Masks and respirators were selected from the three main types of personal protective equipment—textile non-medical masks, surgical masks and respirators. Experimental measurements were conducted to assess how geometric parameters (thickness, bulk density), mass (mass per unit area), and structural parameters (air permeability, face cover area) influence the microclimatic conditions during wear. The results show that thickness, mass per unit area, and bulk density have a significant effect on temperature but negligible influence on CO2 concentration and humidity. In contrast, air permeability and face cover area play a key role in CO2 and moisture accumulation: higher permeability significantly reduces both, while larger coverage tends to increase them. These findings support the need for an integrated design approach that balances filtration efficiency with respiratory and thermophysiological comfort, contributing to improved protective performance and user acceptance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Hydroaerodynamics and Hydraulic Machines, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
Miracle Centre of Competence Lab “Intelligent Mechatronic Solutions in Textiles and Clothing”, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
Centre for Research and Design in Human Comfort, Energy and Environment (CERDECEN), Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
Funding
Internal Competition of the Technical University of Sofia, 2024,
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhai, P., Ding, Y., Wu, X., Long, J., Zhong, Y., and Li, Y. (2020). The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 55.10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105955 ↗
2. Bubbico, L., Mastrangelo, G., Larese-Filon, F., Basso, P., Rigoli, R., Maurelli, M., Ferlito, S., Capelli, M., Gisabella, C., and Javanbakht, M. (2021). Community use of face masks against the spread of COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18063214 ↗
3. Gericke, A., Militký, J., Venkataraman, M., Steyn, H., and Vermaas, J. (2022). The effect of mask style and fabric selection on the comfort properties of fabric masks. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15072559 ↗
4. Otrisal, P., Bungau, C., Obsel, V., Melicharik, Z., and Tont, G. (2021). Selected respiratory protective devices: Respirators and significance of some markings. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13094988 ↗
5. Solano, T., Ni, C., Mittal, R., and Shoele, K. (2022). Perimeter leakage of face masks and its effect on the mask’s efficacy. Phys. Fluids, 34.10.1063/5.0086320 ↗
6. Yousefinejad, S., Jahangiri, M., and Dehghani, F. (2025). Material perspectives for respiratory protection revolution: Application of nanomaterials. Designing Advanced Respiratory Protective Devices for Pandemics, Elsevier Science Ltd.10.1016/B978-0-323-95316-0.00006-2 ↗
7. P2/N95 respirators & surgical masks to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: Effectiveness & adverse effects10.1016/j.idh.2022.01.001 ↗
8. Face masks: Benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis10.1186/s40001-020-00430-5 ↗
9. Angelova, R.A., Ivanova, M., and Sofronova, D. (2024, January 7–11). Testing Methodology for Measuring Carbon Dioxide Concentration, Temperature, and Humidity Under Surgical Face Masks. Proceedings of the 2024 XXXIV International Scientific Symposium Metrology and Metrology Assurance (MMA), Sozopol, Bulgaria.10.1109/MMA62616.2024.10817655 ↗
10. Sofronova, D., Sofronov, Y., and Angelova, R.A. (2021, January 24–26). Design of a Device for Measuring the Parameters of the Microenvironment under Protective Face Masks. Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Symposium on Environment-Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA), Sofia, Bulgaria.10.1109/EFEA49713.2021.9406246 ↗
11. Wang, A.B., Zhang, X., Gao, L.J., Zhang, T., Xu, H.J., and Bi, Y.J. (2023). A review of filtration performance of protective masks. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20032346 ↗
12. Carbon dioxide generation rates for building occupants10.1111/ina.12383 ↗
13. Is CO2 an indoor pollutant? Direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance10.1289/ehp.1104789 ↗
14. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2025, October 08). Carbon Dioxide. United States Department of Labor, Available online: https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/183.
15. Ahirwar, R.K., and Meena, A.K. (2025). Applied Physiology, Academic Guru Publishing House.
16. Performance, acute health symptoms and physiological responses during exposure to high air temperature and carbon dioxide concentration10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.020 ↗
17. Relationship between carbon dioxide levels and reported headaches on the international space station10.1097/JOM.0000000000000158 ↗
18. Toxic carbon dioxide exposures: The unacceptable risk
19. Proposal for an epidemiological surveillance program for the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases in workers exposed to carbon dioxide (CO2) at a Venezuelan brewing company10.56294/dm202355 ↗
20. Gurrieri, S., Di Martino, R.M.R., Camarda, M., and Francofonte, V. (2023). Monitoring CO2 hazards of volcanic origin: A case study at the island of Vulcano (Italy) during 2021–2022. Geosciences, 13.10.3390/geosciences13090266 ↗
21. Living with in-mask micro-climate10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110010 ↗
22. Salman, N., Khan, M.W., Lim, M., Khan, A., Kemp, A.H., and Noakes, C.J. (2021). Use of multiple low cost carbon dioxide sensors to measure exhaled breath distribution with face mask type and wearing behaviour. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21186204 ↗
23. Experimental studies of carbon dioxide concentration in the space under the face mask protecting against COVID-19–Pilot studies10.1007/s40201-022-00816-z ↗
24. An IoT measurement system for a tailored monitoring of CO2 and total volatile organic compounds inside face masks10.21014/actaimeko.v12i3.1536 ↗
25. (1996). Textiles—Determination of Thickness of Textiles and Textile Products (Standard No. ISO 5084:19962).
26. (1977). Textiles—Woven Fabrics—Determination of Mass per Unit Length and Mass per Unit Area (Standard No. ISO 3801:1977).
27. (1995). Textiles—Determination of the Permeability of Fabrics to Air (Standard No. ISO 9237:1995).
28. Measuring the carbon dioxide concentration under protective face masks with a sensor system10.15666/aeer/2104_27752792 ↗