Show source-provided references
5. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: A new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis
10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.021 ↗6. Prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry in panoramic radiographs of adult individuals. A cross-sectional study
10.4317/jced.62144 ↗7. Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal sagittal patterns: A systematic review
10.2319/040921-292.1 ↗8. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry
10.1093/ejo/cjr045 ↗11. Radiographic and diagnostic approaches for mandibular asymmetries in orthodontic practice: A narrative review
10.22514/jocpd.2024.073 ↗12. The way we were (and how we got here): Fifty years of technology changes in dental and maxillofacial radiology
14. Mangal, U., Han, A., Huisoo, K., Jung, Y., Lee, K., Yu, H., Hwang, J., and Choi, S. (2021). Tomographic similarity scan with a computed modified absolute mandibular midsagittal plane for precise and objective localization of mandibular asymmetry. Comput. Biol. Med., 134.
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104465 ↗19. Niu, J., Cheng, J., Chen, Y., Xie, Y., Liu, H., and Lin, Y. (2024, January 19–21). Automated Assessment of Mandibular Asymmetry in Panoramic Radiography. Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (PRML), Chongqing, China.
10.1109/PRML62565.2024.10779918 ↗22. Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making: A systematic review
10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.022 ↗24. Moore-Jansen, P.H., Ousley, S.D., and Jantz, R.L. (1994). Data Collection Procedures for Forensic Skeletal Material, University of Tennessee.
29. Sex-related variation in the dimensions of the mandibular ramus and its relationship with lower third molar impaction
32. Gender and age differences in mandibular ramus and body measurements: A radiographic study
10.2485/jhtb.31.9 ↗33. Stăncioiu, A., Motofelea, A., Hușanu, A., Vasica, L., Nagib, R., Popa, A., and Szuhanek, C. (2025). Associations of digital measurements: Analysis of orthopantomography versus lateral cephalograms for evaluation of facial asymmetry. J. Clin. Med., 14.
10.20944/preprints202501.1581.v1 ↗35. Preliminary study on sexual dimorphism of metric traits of cranium and mandible in a modern Italian skeletal population and review of population literature
10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101695 ↗37. Effects of sagittal maxillary growth hypoplasia severity on mandibular asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects
10.2319/110610-646.1 ↗39. Effect of unilateral posterior crossbite and unilateral cleft lip and palate on vertical mandibular asymmetry
10.1007/s11845-013-1020-0 ↗40. Reliability and validity of mandibular posterior vertical asymmetry index in panoramic radiography compared with cone-beam computed tomography
10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.019 ↗41. Radiological study on mandibular ramus asymmetry in young population
42. Hlatcu, A., Galan, E., Milicescu, S., Teodorescu, E., and Ionescu, E. (2023). An evaluation of the ramus mandibular asymmetry on panoramic radiography. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13137645 ↗43. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images
10.1259/dmfr/28020783 ↗46. Asimetría mandibular en radiografías de niños no sindrómicos con y sin hendidura labio palatina en Bucaramanga, Colombia
10.20453/reh.v31i2.3967 ↗47. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population
48. Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients
10.2319/111517-785.1 ↗49. Comparison of mandibular morphometric parameters in digital panoramic radiography in gender determination using machine learning
10.1007/s11282-024-00751-9 ↗50. Artificial intelligence applications in facial asymmetry diagnosis: A systematic review
53. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011 ↗