journal article·2025-10-03Open access

Evaluating Cybersecurity Measures for Smart Grids Under Uncertainty: A Picture Fuzzy SWARA–CODAS Approach

Betul Kara, Ertugrul Ayyildiz, Bahar Yalcin Kavus, Tolga Kudret Karaca

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

Smart grid operators face escalating cyber threats and tight resource constraints, demanding the transparent, defensible prioritization of security controls. This paper asks how to select cybersecurity controls for smart grids while retaining picture fuzzy evidence throughout and supporting policy-sensitive “what-if” analyses. We propose a hybrid Picture Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS) framework that carries picture fuzzy evidence end-to-end over a domain-specific cost/benefit criteria system and a relative-assessment matrix, complemented by multi-scenario sensitivity analysis. Applied to ten prominent solutions across twenty-nine sub-criteria in four dimensions, the model highlights Performance as the most influential main criterion; at the sub-criterion level, the decisive factors are updating against new threats, threat-detection capability, and policy-customization flexibility; and Zero Trust Architecture emerges as the best overall alternative, with rankings stable under varied weighting scenarios. A managerial takeaway is that foundation controls (e.g., OT-integrated monitoring and ICS-aware detection) consistently remain near the top, while purely deceptive or access-centric options rank lower in this context. The framework contributes an end-to-end picture fuzzy risk-assessment model for smart grid cybersecurity and suggests future work on larger expert panels, cross-utility datasets, and dynamic, periodically refreshed assessments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Electricity Theft Detection Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon 61080, Turkey

College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha P.O. Box 34110, Qatar

Quality Coordination Office, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, İzmir 35620, Turkey

Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Topkapi University, Istanbul 34087, Turkey

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Cyberattacks in Smart Grids: Challenges and Solving the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Cybersecurity Options, Including Ones That Incorporate Artificial Intelligence, Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process10.3390/jcp3040031 ↗
2. Usability Evaluation Through Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach: Security Requirement Perspective
3. Zhao, H., and Li, N. (2016). Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8020129 ↗
4. Synergistic Operation Framework for the Energy Hub Merging Stochastic Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Optimization and Stackelberg Game10.1109/TSG.2024.3454341 ↗
5. Gharib, Z., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., and Yazdani, M. (2022). Post-Disaster Temporary Shelters Distribution after a Large-Scale Disaster: An Integrated Model. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12040414 ↗
6. AI Software Selection for Cybersecurity Auditing Using Neutrosophic CRITIC CODAS10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113295 ↗
7. Eti, S., Yüksel, S., Pamucar, D., Dinçer, H., Deveci, M., and Gökalp, Y. (2024). Markov Chain and RATGOS-Driven Fuzzy Decision-Making for Prioritizing Cybersecurity Measures in Microgrid Systems. OPSEARCH.10.1007/s12597-024-00897-4 ↗
8. Hanif, M.Z., and Yaqoob, N. (2025). Prioritized Decision Support System for Cybersecurity Selection Based on Extended Symmetrical Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Hamacher Aggregation Operators. Symmetry, 17.10.3390/sym17010070 ↗
9. Cyber Risk Assessment in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Decision-making Approach for Small E-tailors10.1111/risa.14092 ↗
10. Satapathy, S.C., Bhateja, V., Mohanty, J.R., and Udgata, S.K. (2020). Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Smart Computing and Informatics, Volume 2, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-9282-5 ↗
11. Alyami, H., Ansari, M.T.J., Alharbi, A., Alosaimi, W., Alshammari, M., Pandey, D., Agrawal, A., Kumar, R., and Khan, R.A. (2022). Effectiveness Evaluation of Different IDSs Using Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11060859 ↗
12. Alhakami, W. (2023). Computational Study of Security Risk Evaluation in Energy Management and Control Systems Based on a Fuzzy MCDM Method. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11051366 ↗
13. A Novel Interval Valued Picture Fuzzy SWARA & CODAS Methodology: Renewable Energy Selection Application
14. Wu, X., Zhu, Z., Çaylı, G., Liu, P., Zhang, X., and Yang, Z. (2022). Picture Fuzzy Interactional Aggregation Operators via Strict Triangular Norms and Applications to Multi-Criteria Decision Making. arXiv.
15. Decision Algorithm for Picture Fuzzy Sets and Aczel Alsina Aggregation Operators Based on Unknown Degree of Wights10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27548 ↗
16. Cuong, B.C., and Kreinovich, V. (2013, January 15–18). Picture Fuzzy Sets—A New Concept for Computational Intelligence Problems. Proceedings of the 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT 2013), Hanoi, Vietnam.10.1109/WICT.2013.7113099 ↗
17. Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA)10.3846/jbem.2010.12 ↗
18. New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.4526 ↗
19. Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS)10.15388/Informatica.2015.57 ↗
20. Potential Smart Grid Vulnerabilities to Cyber Attacks: Current Threats and Existing Mitigation Strategies10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37980 ↗
21. Ding, J., Qammar, A., Zhang, Z., Karim, A., and Ning, H. (2022). Cyber Threats to Smart Grids: Review, Taxonomy, Potential Solutions, and Future Directions. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15186799 ↗
22. Zolfani, S.H., and Chatterjee, P. (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Sustainable Design Based on Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Best Worst Method (BWM) Methods: A Perspective on Household Furnishing Materials. Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11010074 ↗
23. Location Selection Methodology for Data Center with Renewable Energy Integration10.1016/j.renene.2025.123270 ↗
24. Evaluation of Sustainable Development and Utilization-Oriented Renewable Energy Systems Based on CRITIC-SWARA-CODAS Method Using Interval Valued Picture Fuzzy Sets10.1016/j.segan.2023.101263 ↗
25. A Strategic Sustainability Framework for Smart City Investment Prioritization10.1016/j.scs.2025.106705 ↗
26. Combinative Distance Based Assessment (CODAS) Framework Using Logarithmic Normalization for Multi-Criteria Decision Making10.5937/sjm16-27758 ↗
27. ERP Selection Using Picture Fuzzy CODAS Method
28. Picture Fuzzy Sets
29. Picture Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Based on CPFRS Model: An Application to Risk Management Problems
30. Challenges to Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption for Sustainability: A Picture Fuzzy Approach10.1002/ieam.4740 ↗
31. TODIM Method for Picture Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making10.15388/Informatica.2018.181 ↗
32. Assessment of the Challenges to Renewable Energy Technologies Adoption in Rural Areas: A Fermatean CRITIC-VIKOR Approach10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122399 ↗
33. Strategic Site Selection Methodology for Small Modular Reactors: A Case Study in Türkiye10.1016/j.rser.2025.115545 ↗
34. A Survey of Intrusion Detection on Industrial Control Systems10.1177/1550147718794615 ↗
35. Machine Learning for Cybersecurity in Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Review-Based Study on Methods, Solutions, and Prospects10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100547 ↗
36. Wiboonrat, M. (2022, January 17–20). Cybersecurity in Industrial Control Systems: An Integration of Information Technology and Operational Technology. Proceedings of the IECON 2022—48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Brussels, Belgium.10.1109/IECON49645.2022.9968468 ↗
37. Hardware Security Modules for Sustainable Energy Systems: Targeted Review10.1016/j.ijcip.2025.100791 ↗
38. When Blockchain Meets Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Survey10.1016/j.hcc.2022.100059 ↗
39. Key Management Systems for Smart Grid Advanced Metering Infrastructure: A Survey10.1109/COMST.2019.2907650 ↗
40. Identity and Access Management for IoT in Smart Grid10.1007/978-3-030-44041-1_104 ↗
41. Don’t Get Stung, Cover Your ICS in Honey: How Do Honeypots Fit within Industrial Control System Security10.1016/j.cose.2021.102598 ↗