From Questionnaires to Heatmaps: Visual Classification and Interpretation of Quantitative Response Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Structured quantitative data, such as survey responses in human resource management research, are often analysed using machine learning methods, including logistic regression. Although these methods provide accurate statistical predictions, their results are frequently abstract and difficult for non-specialists to comprehend. This limits their usefulness in practice, particularly in contexts where eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is essential. This study proposes a domain-independent approach for the autonomous classification and interpretation of quantitative data using visual processing. This method transforms individual responses based on rating scales into visual representations, which are subsequently processed by Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). In combination with Class Activation Maps (CAMs), image-based CNN models enable not only accurate and reproducible classification but also visual interpretability of the underlying decision-making process. Our evaluation found that CNN models with bar chart coding achieved an accuracy of between 93.05% and 93.16%, comparable to the 93.19% achieved by logistic regression. Compared with conventional numerical approaches, exemplified by logistic regression in this study, the approach achieves comparable classification accuracy while providing additional comprehensibility and transparency through graphical representations. Robustness is demonstrated by consistent results across different visualisations generated from the same underlying data. By converting abstract numerical information into visual explanations, this approach addresses a core challenge: bridging the gap between model performance and human understanding. Its transparency, domain-agnostic design, and straightforward interpretability make it particularly suitable for XAI-driven applications across diverse disciplines that use quantitative response data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Applications · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Machine Learning and Data Classification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Business Administration, Triagon Academy, MRS1331 Marsa, Malta
Webasto Roof & Components SE, Werner-Baier-Strasse 1, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany
Department of Business Psychology, University Institute Schaffhausen, 8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland
FIM Research Center, University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, 86161 Augsburg, Germany
Department of Business Psychology, Seeburg Castle University, 5201 Seekirchen am Wallersee, Austria
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. A Hybrid Approach of Stepwise Regression, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Decision Tree for Forecasting Fraudulent Financial Statements10.1155/2014/968712 ↗
2. Dervovic, D., Lécué, F., Marchesotti, N., and Magazzeni, D. (2024). Are Logistic Models Really Interpretable?. arXiv.
3. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). “Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
4. A Convolutional Neural Network to Perform Object Detection and Identification in Visual Large-Scale Data10.1089/big.2019.0093 ↗
5. Alenizy, H.A., and Berri, J. (2025). Transforming Tabular Data into Images via Enhanced Spatial Relationships for CNN Processing. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-01568-0 ↗
6. Lim, H., and Song, E. (2025). Beef Carcass Grading with EfficientViT: A Lightweight Vision Transformer Approach. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15116302 ↗
7. Kim, J.-S.G., Chung, S., Ko, M., Song, J., and Shin, S.H. (2025). Comparison of Image Preprocessing Strategies for Convolutional Neural Network-Based Growth Stage Classification of Butterhead Lettuce in Industrial Plant Factories. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15116278 ↗
8. Knapińska, Z., and Mulawka, J. (2025). Patient-Tailored Dementia Diagnosis with CNN-Based Brain MRI Classification. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15094652 ↗
9. Mamdouh, A., El-Melegy, M., Ali, S., and Kikinis, R. (2025). Tab2Visual: Overcoming Limited Data in Tabular Data Classification Using Deep Learning with Visual Representations. arXiv.
10. Perception of Wide-Expanse Symmetric Patterns10.1016/j.visres.2024.108455 ↗
11. Ullah, I., Rios, A., Gala, V., and Mckeever, S. (2022). Explaining Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data Using Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12010136 ↗
12. Thielmann, A., Reuter, A., and Saefken, B. (2025). Beyond Black-Box Predictions: Identifying Marginal Feature Effects in Tabular Transformer Networks. arXiv.
13. The Role of Social Work in Enhancing Social Governance: Policy, Law, Practice, and Integration of Machine Learning for Improved Outcomes10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.002 ↗
14. Padmakala, S., and Chandrasekar, A. (2024, January 9–10). From Imputation to Prediction: A Comprehensive Machine Learning Pipeline for Stroke Risk Analysis. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI), Chennai, India.10.1109/ACCAI61061.2024.10601848 ↗
15. Jiang, W., Zhao, M., and Li, H. (2025). Time Series Image Coding Classification Theory Based on Lagrange Multiplier Method. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-03433-6 ↗
16. Corrêa, J.S., Cavalca, D.L., and Fernandes, R.A.S. (2023, January 6–9). Gramian Angular Field and Recurrence Plots as Feature Engineering Techniques on Residential Appliances Labeling: A Comparative Analysis. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT-LA), San Juan, PR, USA.10.1109/ISGT-LA56058.2023.10328293 ↗
17. Towards Efficient Image-Based Representation of Tabular Data10.1007/s00521-023-09074-y ↗
18. BIE: Binary Image Encoding for the Classification of Tabular Data10.6339/24-JDS1122 ↗
19. GAN-Based Synthetic Medical Image Augmentation for Increased CNN Performance in Liver Lesion Classification10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.013 ↗
20. A CNN Based Discrimination between Natural and Computer Generated Images10.52783/pmj.v35.i2s.2948 ↗
21. A Method for Improving CNN-Based Image Recognition Using DCGAN
22. Generalization of CNNs on Relational Reasoning With Bar Charts10.1109/TVCG.2024.3463800 ↗
23. Utilizing Customized CNN for Brain Tumor Prediction with Explainable AI10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38997 ↗
24. Garg, P., Sharma, M.K., and Kumar, P. (2025). Transparency in Diagnosis: Unveiling the Power of Deep Learning and Explainable AI for Medical Image Interpretation. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 1–17.10.1007/s13369-024-09896-5 ↗
25. Narkhede, J. (2024, January 15–17). Comparative Evaluation of Post-Hoc Explainability Methods in AI: LIME, SHAP, and Grad-CAM. Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems (ICSES), Kaski, Nepal.10.1109/ICSES63445.2024.10762963 ↗
26. Visualizing the Unseen: Exploring GRAD-CAM for Interpreting Convolutional Image Classifiers10.54216/JAIM.040104 ↗
27. A Comparative Analysis of Non-Gradient Methods of Class Activation Mapping
28. Explainable Disease Classification: Exploring Grad-CAM Analysis of CNNs and ViTs
29. Predictive and Discriminative Localization of Pathology Using High Resolution Class Activation Maps with CNNs10.7717/peerj-cs.622 ↗
30. Wang, Z., Yan, W., and Oates, T. (2017, January 14–19). Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baseline. Proceedings of the 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966039 ↗
31. Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery Based on Combination of Deep Belief Network and One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953490 ↗
32. Rule Extraction from Neural Network Using Input Data Ranges Recursively10.1007/s00354-018-0048-0 ↗
33. Lantang, O., Tiba, A., Hajdu, A., and Terdik, G. (2019, January 23–25). Convolutional Neural Network For Predicting The Spread of Cancer. Proceedings of the 2019 10th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), Naples, Italy.10.1109/CogInfoCom47531.2019.9089939 ↗
34. Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., and Torralba, A. (2016, January 27–30). Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.319 ↗
35. Ali, M.L., Thakur, K., Schmeelk, S., Debello, J., and Dragos, D. (2025). Deep Learning vs. Machine Learning for Intrusion Detection in Computer Networks: A Comparative Study. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15041903 ↗
36. Cardiac Disease Detection Using Machine Learning10.48175/IJARSCT-24946 ↗
37. Fu, R., Hu, Q., Dong, X., Guo, Y., Gao, Y., and Li, B. (2020, January 7–10). Axiom-Based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNs. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, Online.10.5244/C.34.146 ↗
38. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 ↗
39. Leveraging CAM Algorithms for Explaining Medical Semantic Segmentation10.59275/j.melba.2024-ebd3 ↗
40. An Inspection of CNN Model for Citrus Canker Image Classification Based on XAI: Grad-CAM10.37727/jkdas.2022.24.6.2133 ↗
41. It’s the Base: Why Displaying Anger Instead of Sadness Might Increase Leaders’ Perceived Power but Worsen Their Leadership Outcomes10.1007/s10869-016-9467-4 ↗
42. What is not Beautiful Should Match: How Attractiveness Similarity Affects Consumer Responses to Advertising10.1007/s11002-017-9428-3 ↗
43. Traits Grow Important with Increasing Age: Customer Age, Brand Personality and Loyalty
44. Baumbach, L., Frese, M., Härter, M., König, H.-H., and Hajek, A. (2023). Patients Satisfied with Care Report Better Quality of Life and Self-Rated Health—Cross-Sectional Findings Based on Hospital Quality Data. Healthcare, 11.10.3390/healthcare11050775 ↗
45. Jing, P., Xu, G., Chen, Y., Shi, Y., and Zhan, F. (2020). The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12051719 ↗
46. Me, Myself and AI: How Gender, Personality and Emotions Determine Willingness to Use Strong AI for Self-Improvement10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123760 ↗
47. Anastasiei, B., Dospinescu, N., and Dospinescu, O. (2023). Word-of-Mouth Engagement in Online Social Networks: Influence of Network Centrality and Density. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12132857 ↗
48. Netzwerkforschung im kulturellen Kontext: Eine kulturvergleichende Analyse des Zusammenhangs zwischen Merkmalen sozialer Netzwerke und Lebenszufriedenheit10.1007/s11620-009-0059-4 ↗