Total Fuel Cost, Power Loss, and Voltage Deviation Reduction for Power Systems with Optimal Placement and Operation of FACTS and Renewable Power Sources
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper finds optimal power flows and optimal placement of wind power plants (WPPs), static var compensators (SVCs), and thyristor-controlled series capacitors (TCSCs) in the IEEE 30-bus transmission power network by applying three high-performance algorithms, such as the equilibrium optimizer (EO), the Coot optimization algorithm (COOT), and the marine predators algorithm (MPSA). The three algorithms are run for the system without any added electric components and with three single objectives, including active power losses, total fuel cost, and total voltage deviation, for comparison with other previous algorithms. The three algorithms can reach better results than many algorithms and suffer worse results than a few algorithms. EO is more effective than MPSA and COOT in all cases. For simulation cases with SVCs, TCSCs, and WPPs, the losses are significantly reduced compared to the base case. The power loss of the base case is 3.066 MW, and the best loss is 2.869 MW for two cases with two SVCs and one TCSC. When applying the obtained solution and optimizing the placement of one, two, and three WPPs, the power loss is, respectively, 2.053, 1.512, and 1.112 MW. By optimizing two SVCs, one TCSC, and WPPs simultaneously, the power loss is, respectively, 2.041, 1.508, and 1.093 MW for one, two, and three WPPs. So, the optimal placement of TCSCs, SVCs, and WPPs can result in high benefits for power systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Department of Electrical Engineering, The University of Da Nang—University of Science and Technology, Da Nang City, Vietnam
Power System Optimization Research Group, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Funding
Ministry of Education and Training
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. FOPIR Controller for TCSC Based Gate Turn-off Switches to Control Power Quality in Transmission Line10.1007/s00202-024-02240-y ↗
2. Rana, A.S., Bajaj, M., and Gairola, S. (2019). Optimal Power Flow Solution in Smart Grid Environment Using SVC and TCSC, IntechOpen.
3. Farhat, M., Kamel, S., Atallah, A.M., Hassan, M.H., and Agwa, A.M. (2022). ESMA-OPF: Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14042305 ↗
4. Optimal Dispatch of Reactive Power Using Modified Stochastic Fractal Search Algorithm10.1155/2019/4670820 ↗
5. An Approach to Solve OPF Problems Using a Novel Hybrid Whale and Sine Cosine Optimization Algorithm
6. An Improved Heap Optimization Algorithm for Efficient Energy Management Based Optimal Power Flow Model10.1016/j.energy.2022.123795 ↗
7. Long-Term Optimal Operation of the Cascade Hydro-Wind-Photovoltaic Hybrid System Considering Transmission Section Constraints10.1155/2023/8484804 ↗
8. Enhanced Genetic Algorithm Based Computation Technique for Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Solution10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.010 ↗
9. Faster Evolutionary Algorithm Based Optimal Power Flow Using Incremental Variables10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.019 ↗
10. Efficiency Improvements in Meta-Heuristic Algorithms to Solve the Optimal Power Flow Problem
11. Optimal Power Flow Using Particle Swarm Optimization10.1016/S0142-0615(01)00067-9 ↗
12. Improved Particle Swarm Optimisation for Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Considering the Cost, Loss, Emission and Voltage Stability Index10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0851 ↗
13. Genetic Evolving Ant Direction Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Power Flow with Non-Smooth Cost Functions and Statistical Analysis10.1016/j.asoc.2013.07.002 ↗
14. Vo, D.N., and Schegner, P. (2013). An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization for Optimal Power Flow. Meta-Heuristics Optimization Algorithms in Engineering, Business, Economics, and Finance, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-2086-5.ch001 ↗
15. Optimal Power Flow Based on Parallel Metaheuristics for Graphics Processing Units10.1016/j.epsr.2016.06.006 ↗
16. Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Using Grey Wolf Optimizer and Differential Evolution Algorithms10.1080/15325008.2015.1041625 ↗
17. Optimal Power Flow Using Differential Evolution Algorithm10.1016/j.epsr.2009.12.018 ↗
18. Application of Biogeography-Based Optimisation to Solve Different Optimal Power Flow Problems10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0237 ↗
19. Optimal Power Flow for a Deregulated Power System Using Adaptive Real Coded Biogeography-Based Optimization10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.05.011 ↗
20. Application of Multi-Objective Teaching Learning Based Optimization Algorithm to Optimal Power Flow Problem10.1016/j.protcy.2012.10.031 ↗
21. Adaptive Group Search Optimization Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problem10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.057 ↗
22. Utilizing the Honeybees Mating-Inspired Firefly Algorithm to Extract Parameters of the Wind Speed Weibull Model10.3390/forecast6020020 ↗
23. Optimal Reactive Power Flow Using Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming10.1016/j.scient.2012.05.002 ↗
24. Optimal Power Flow Using Gravitational Search Algorithm10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.024 ↗
25. Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Solving Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problem10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.04.021 ↗
26. Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Considering the Cost, Emission, Voltage Deviation and Power Losses Using Multi-Objective Modified Imperialist Competitive Algorithm10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.007 ↗
27. Optimal Power Flow Using an Improved Electromagnetism-like Mechanism Method10.1080/15325008.2015.1115919 ↗
28. Optimal Power Flow Using an Improved Colliding Bodies Optimization Algorithm10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.041 ↗
29. Ladumor, D.P., Trivedi, I.N., Bhesdadiya, R.H., and Jangir, P. (2017, January 27–28). A Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm for Voltage Stability Enhancement. Proceedings of the 2017 Third International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics (AEEICB), Chennai, India.10.1109/AEEICB.2017.7972429 ↗
30. Optimal Power Flow Using Moth Swarm Algorithm10.1016/j.epsr.2016.09.025 ↗
31. A High Performance Social Spider Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Power Flow Solution with Single Objective Optimization10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.021 ↗
32. Hassan, M.H., Kamel, S., Selim, A., Khurshaid, T., and Domínguez-García, J.L. (2021). A Modified Rao-2 Algorithm for Optimal Power Flow Incorporating Renewable Energy Sources. Mathematics, 9.10.3390/math9131532 ↗
33. A Modified Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem in Power Systems10.1016/j.egyr.2023.12.053 ↗
34. Investigation of the Transfer Capability of the Nigerian 330 KV, 58-Bus Power System Network Using FACTS Devices10.11113/elektrika.v22n1.422 ↗
35. Enhancing Power System Stability: An Innovative Approach Using Coordination of FOPID Controller for PSS and SVC FACTS Device with MFO Algorithm10.1007/s00202-023-02051-7 ↗
36. Enhancement in Voltage Stability Using FACTS Devices Under Contingency Conditions
37. Power Loss Reduction and Voltage Profile Improvement Using Optimal Placement of FACTS Devices10.1088/1757-899X/1067/1/012128 ↗
38. Marouani, I., Guesmi, T., Alshammari, B.M., Alqunun, K., Alshammari, A.S., Albadran, S., Hadj Abdallah, H., and Rahmani, S. (2023). Optimized FACTS Devices for Power System Enhancement: Applications and Solving Methods. Sustainability, 15.10.20944/preprints202304.1123.v1 ↗
39. Ćalasan, M., Konjić, T., Kecojević, K., and Nikitović, L. (2020). Optimal Allocation of Static Var Compensators in Electric Power Systems. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13123219 ↗
40. Dandotia, A., Gupta, M.K., Banerjee, M.K., Singh, S.K., Đurin, B., Dogančić, D., and Kranjčić, N. (2023). Optimal Placement and Size of SVC with Cost-Effective Function Using Genetic Algorithm for Voltage Profile Improvement in Renewable Integrated Power Systems. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16062637 ↗
41. Particle Swarm Optimization for Optimal Allocation of STATCOM on Transmission Network10.1088/1742-6596/1880/1/012035 ↗
42. Optimal Siting and Sizing of SSSC Using Modified Salp Swarm Algorithm Considering Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Problem10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061503 ↗
43. Optimal Power Flow Solution Using Levy Spiral Flight Equilibrium Optimizer with Incorporating CUPFC10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3078115 ↗
44. Nguyen, T.T., and Mohammadi, F. (2020). Optimal Placement of TCSC for Congestion Management and Power Loss Reduction Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072813 ↗
45. COOT Bird Behavior-Based Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Placement of Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator Devices in Transmission Power Networks
46. Optimal Power Flow with Renewable Energy Resources Using Static VAR Compensator and Grey Wolf Optimisation
47. Optimal Allocation of D-STATCOM in Distribution Networks Including Correlated Renewable Energy Sources10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106178 ↗
48. Yang, N.-C., and Chang, Z.-H. (2023). Optimal Capacity and Location for STATCOM with Seasonal Wind Power Prediction Using C-Vine Copula. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11132815 ↗
49. Risk Mitigation & Profit Improvement of a Wind-Fuel Cell Hybrid System with TCSC Placement10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267163 ↗
50. Improved Power System Dynamic Stability by DFIG in the Presence of SSSC Using Adaptive Nonlinear Multi-Input Backstepping
51. A Probabilistic Approach for Optimal Operation of Wind-integrated Power Systems Including UPFC10.1049/rpg2.12627 ↗
52. A New Optimization Method Based on COOT Bird Natural Life Model10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115352 ↗
53. Equilibrium Optimizer: A Novel Optimization Algorithm10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190 ↗
54. Marine Predators Algorithm: A Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377 ↗
55. (2025, January 01). MATPOWER PGROGRAM. Available online: https://matpower.org/matpower-7-0-launch/.
56. Handling Multiple-Fuel Options in Economic Dispatch of Thermal Power Plants Through a Tight Model Applying Indicator Variables10.1155/etep/1572487 ↗
57. (2025, September 20). The Siemens SGT6-5000F Gas Turbine. Available online: https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/products-services/product/sgt6-5000f.html#/.
58. Adaptive Multi Objective Parallel Seeker Optimization Algorithm for Incorporating TCSC Devices into Optimal Power Flow Framework10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905266 ↗
59. A Hybrid Differential Evolution and Harmony Search for Optimal Power Flow with FACTS Devices10.4018/IJORIS.2020070103 ↗
60. Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem for IEEE-30 Bus System Using a Developed Particle Swarm Optimization Method: Towards Fuel Cost Minimization10.1080/02286203.2023.2201043 ↗
61. Minimize the One-Year Energy for Distribution Power Grids with Renewable Energies-Based Distributed Generators, Capacitors, and Soft Open Points10.1155/er/3457520 ↗
62. Enhanced Wombat Optimization Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow in Renewable Energy and Electric Vehicle Integrated Systems10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103671 ↗
63. Optimal Power Flow Solution Integrated with TCSC to Improved Voltage Profile and Losses Reduction in Power System Using Effective Intelligent Technique