Linear Optimization Model with Nonlinear Constraints to Maximize Biogas Production from Organic Waste: A Practical Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
The excessive use of fossil fuels and the increasing generation of solid waste, driven by population growth, industrialization, and economic development, have led to serious environmental, energy, and public health issues. In light of this problem, it is crucial to adopt sustainable solutions that promote the transition to renewable energy sources, such as biogas. Although progress has been made in optimizing biogas production, there is still no adaptable model for various environments that allows for the determination of optimal quantities of different organic wastes, simultaneously considering their composition, moisture content, and control of critical factors for biogas production, as well as the biodigester’s capacity and other relevant elements. In practice, the dosing of waste is conducted empirically, leading to inefficiencies that limit the potential for biogas production in real scenarios. The objective of this article is to propose a linear optimization model with nonlinear constraints that maximizes biogas production, considering fundamental parameters such as the moisture percentage, pH, carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N), substrate volume, organic matter, volatile solids (VS), and biogas production potential from different wastes. The model estimates the optimal waste composition based on the biodigester capacity to ensure balanced substrates. The results for the proposed scenarios demonstrate its effectiveness: Scenario 1 achieved 3.42 m3 (3418.67 L) of biogas, while Scenario 2, with a greater diversity of waste, reached 8.06 m3 (8061.43 L). The model maintained pH (6.49–6.50), C/N ratio (20.00), and moisture (60.00%) within optimal ranges. Additionally, a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis (1000 simulations) validated its robustness with a 95% confidence level. This model provides an efficient tool for optimizing biogas production and waste dosing in rural contexts, promoting clean and sustainable technologies for renewable energy generation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Telecommunications Engineering Program, School of Basic Sciences, Technology and Engineering (ECBTI), Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
Funding
UNAD
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Kokoulin, A.N., Uzhakov, A.A., and Tur, A.I. (2020, January 6–12). The Automated Sorting Methods Modernization of Municipal Solid Waste Processing System. Proceedings of the 2020 International Russian Automation Conference, RusAutoCon 2020, Sochi, Russia.10.1109/RusAutoCon49822.2020.9208039 ↗
2. Vesga Ferreira, J.C., Perez, H.E., and Vesga Barrera, J.A. (2025). Design of a Waste Classification System Using a Low Experimental Cost Capacitive Sensor and Machine Learning Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15031565 ↗
3. Bioeconomía: El futuro sostenible10.18257/raccefyn.650 ↗
4. Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy10.1111/gcbb.12578 ↗
5. Status quo and perspectives of biogas production for energy and material utilization10.1111/gcbb.12548 ↗
6. Study on Electricity Generation through biogas on small scale
7. Biogas production from organic waste generated at the Hospital of Clinics: A preliminary study10.18004/anales/2019.052.03.53-058 ↗
8. Sen, G.P., Saxena, B.K., and Mishra, S. (2020, January 21–22). Feasibility Analysis of Community Level Biogas Based Power Plant in a Village of Rajasthan. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Materials, ICACCM 2020, Dehradun, India.10.1109/ICACCM50413.2020.9213073 ↗
9. Vesga Ferreira, J.C., Sepulveda, F.A.A., and Perez Waltero, H.E. (2024). Smart Ecological Points, a Strategy to Face the New Challenges in Solid Waste Management in Colombia. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135300 ↗
10. Pérez Pérez, N. (2019). Aprovechamiento de la Cascarilla de Café para Generar Energía Eléctrica en la Planta Procesadora Representaciones Mego SRL en Jaén, Universidad César Vallejo. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12692/39688.
11. Tenzin, T. (2018, January 28–29). Optimization of biogas production from kitchen waste installed at college of science and technology. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GUCON), Greater Noida, India.10.1109/GUCON.2018.8674963 ↗
12. Li, X., and Wang, Y. (2017, January 20–22). Prediction model of biogas production for anaerobic digestion process of food waste based on LM-BP neural network and particle swarm algorithm optimization. Proceedings of the 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, China.10.1109/CAC.2017.8244159 ↗
13. Menaka, D., Nandhakumar, S., Abishek, R., Raghavendran, M.R., and Vishnu Hariharan, A.S. (2023, January 21–23). Smart Optimization of Biogas Production for Enhanced Gas Yield. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Data Science, Agents & Artificial Intelligence (ICDSAAI), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICDSAAI59313.2023.10452630 ↗
14. Sustainable biomass hydrodeoxygenation in biphasic systems10.1039/D1GC03836B ↗
15. Artificial neural network model for predicting methane percentage in biogas recovered from a landfill upon injection of liquid organic waste10.1007/s10098-014-0798-4 ↗
16. Machine learning based prediction of biogas generation from municipal solid waste: A data-driven approach10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.037 ↗
17. Rutland, H., You, J., Liu, H., Bull, L., and Reynolds, D. (2023). A Systematic Review of Machine-Learning Solutions in Anaerobic Digestion. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10121410 ↗
18. Abdurrahman, A.H., Kirom, M.R., and Suhendi, A. (2020, January 17–18). Biogas Production Volume Measurement and Internet of Things based Monitoring System. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite, Comnetsat 2020, Batam, Indonesia.10.1109/Comnetsat50391.2020.9328948 ↗
19. Acharya, V., Hegde, V.V., Anjan, K., and Manoj Kumar, M. (2017, January 21–23). IoT (Internet of Things) Based Efficiency Monitoring System for Bio-Gas Plants. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS), Bengaluru, India.10.1109/CSITSS.2017.8447567 ↗
20. Agajie, T.F., Fopah-Lele, A., Amoussou, I., Ali, A., Khan, B., and Tanyi, E. (2023). Optimal Design and Mathematical Modeling of Hybrid Solar PV–Biogas Generator with Energy Storage Power Generation System in Multi-Objective Function Cases. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15108264 ↗
21. Zhang, Y. (2022). Plant-scale biogas production prediction based on multiple hybrid machine learning technique. Bioresour. Technol., 363.10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127899 ↗
22. Energy-efficient biomass processing with pulsed electric fields for bioeconomy and sustainable development10.1186/s13068-016-0508-z ↗
23. Advancement in biogas production from the solid waste by optimizing the anaerobic digestion10.1007/s42768-020-00036-x ↗
24. Using biogas for energy cogeneration: An analysis of electric and thermal energy generation from agro-industrial waste
25. Fígoli, I., Perna, V., Horta, G., Perco, L., Reyes, A., and Sierra, W. (2018, January 14–16). The role of biomass in Uruguay’s energy transformation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 9th Power, Instrumentation and Measurement Meeting, EPIM 2018, Salto, Uruguay.10.1109/EPIM.2018.8756374 ↗
26. ‘Industrie 4.0’ and Smart Manufacturing—A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004 ↗
27. Energy, Bioeconomy
28. Muthu, D., Venkatasubramanian, C., Ramakrishnan, K., and Sasidhar, J. (2017). Production of Biogas from wastes Blended with CowDung for Electricity generation—A Case study. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing.10.1088/1755-1315/80/1/012055 ↗
29. Effects of temperature and carbon-nitrogen (C/N) ratio on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, chicken manure and rice straw: Focusing on ammonia inhibition
30. Optimization of biogas production from straw wastes by different pretreatments: Progress, challenges, and prospects10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166992 ↗
31. Kabaivanova, L., Hubenov, V., Dimitrov, N., and Petrova, P. (2024). Anaerobic Two-Phase Co-Digestion for Renewable Energy Production: Estimating the Effect of Substrate Pretreatment, Hydraulic Retention Time and Participating Microbial Consortia. Appl. Sci., 14.10.2139/ssrn.4829671 ↗
32. A dynamic model for calculating methane emissions from digestate based on co-digestion of animal manure and biogas crops in full scale German biogas plants10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.060 ↗
33. Nahar, G., Koley, A., Garai, S., Balachandran, S., and Ross, A.B. (2024). Enhancing Biogas Production Through the Co-Digestion of Fish Waste (FW) and Water Hyacinth (WH) Using Cow Dung as an Inoculum: Effect of FW/WH Ratio. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14219880 ↗
34. Sudha, S., Vidhyalakshmi, M., Pavithra, K., Sangeetha, K., and Swaathi, V. (2016, January 15–16). An automatic classification method for environment: Friendly waste segregation using deep learning. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Technological Innovations in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Development, TIAR 2016, Chennai, India.10.1109/TIAR.2016.7801215 ↗
35. Mota-Panizio, R., Hermoso-Orzáez, M.J., Carmo-Calado, L., Lourinho, G., and De Brito, P.S.D. (2021). Biochemical Methane Potential of Cork Boiling Wastewater at Different Inoculum to Substrate Ratios. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11073064 ↗
36. Biomethanization of cattle manure, pig manure and poultry manure mixture in co-digestion with waste of pineapple fruit and content of chicken-gizzard- Part I: Kinetic and thermodynamic modelling studies10.2174/1874070701711010036 ↗
37. Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137 ↗
38. Dadic, B., Ivankovic, T., Spelic, K., Hrenovic, J., and Jurisic, V. (2024). Natural Materials as Carriers of Microbial Consortium for Bioaugmentation of Anaerobic Digesters. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202407.1618.v1 ↗
39. Anaerobic digestion of high-yielding tropical energy crops for biomethane production: Effects of crop types, locations and plant parts10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.062 ↗
40. Peng, S., Guo, L., Li, Y., Huang, H., Peng, J., and Liu, X. (2024). Biogas Production Prediction Based on Feature Selection and Ensemble Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020901 ↗
41. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and animal manure: A review of operating parameters, inhibiting factors, and pretreatment with their impact on process performance10.1007/s13399-021-01626-3 ↗
42. Modeling and optimization of biogas production from cow manure and maize straw using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.050 ↗
43. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027 ↗
44. Transformation of organic matters in animal wastes during composting10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.016 ↗
45. Pardo LA, Á. (2021, May 04). Experiencias en la Generación de Energía a Partir de Biogás. Available online: https://publicaciones.fedepalma.org/index.php/palmas/article/view/11041.
46. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032 ↗
47. Effect of aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of compost10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.099 ↗
48. Composting technology in waste stabilization: On the methods, challenges and future prospects10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.051 ↗
49. Mandal, S., Yasmin, H., Sarker, M.R.I., and Beg, M.R.A. (2017). Prospect of solar-PV/biogas/diesel generator hybrid energy system of an off-grid area in Bangladesh. AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc.10.1063/1.5018538 ↗
50. Quantification of biodegradable household solid waste for biogas production and the challenges of waste sorting in Abeokuta Metropolis, Nigeria10.1007/s42108-019-00033-9 ↗
51. Pan, Z. (2024). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Microalgae at Variable Mixing Ratios: Enhanced Performance, Kinetic Analysis, and Microbial Community Dynamics Investigation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114387 ↗
52. Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge: Co-substrates and influencing parameters10.1007/s11157-019-09515-y ↗
53. Sánchez Sánchez, M. (2019). Análisis de Sensibilidad Bayesiana a Través de Clases de Distribuciones a Priori: Teoría y Aplicaciones. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Cádiz].
54. Appala, V.N.S.G., Pandhare, N.N., and Bajpai, S. (2022). Mathematical Models for Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production. Zero Waste Biorefinery, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-16-8682-5_21 ↗
55. Haddon, A. (2024, October 08). Mathematical Modeling and Optimization for Biogas Production. Available online: https://theses.hal.science/tel-02478779.
56. Performance evaluation of controllers applied to power generator set operating with wastewater biogas10.1007/s00202-020-01113-4 ↗
57. Mutaqin, M.I. (2019, January 23–24). Biogas Consumption Pattern in Indonesia: (A Case Study of Sumedang Community Biogas Plant, Indonesia). In Proceeding of the 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application: Innovative Technology Toward Energy Resilience, ICSEEA 2019, Tangerang, Indonesia.10.1109/ICSEEA47812.2019.8938624 ↗
58. Impact of total solids content on anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and food waste: Insights into shifting of the methanogenic pathway10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.048 ↗
59. Modeling and optimization of biomethane production from solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and other co-substrates