journal article·2025-09-24Open access

Development of Customized Algorithms for the Semi-Automatic Generation of Gradient, Conformal Strut-Based Lattice Structures Using Rhino 8 and Grasshopper: Application and Flexural Testing

Sebastian Geyer, Richard Giefing, Christian Hölzl

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 19

Abstract

In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the field of design for additive manufacturing (DfAM). These advancements have focused on key aspects such as topology optimization (TO), generative design (GD), lattice structures, and AI-based algorithms. This paper presents a methodology for developing custom Grasshopper® algorithms to create strut-based, gradient, and conformal lattice structures. Two test geometries were devised and imported into Grasshopper®, and different lattice structures with varying settings, such as conformity, lattice topology, and strut diameter gradient and cell size gradient, were generated and manufactured. A series of experiments was conducted to assess the impact of input parameters on the formation of lattice structures, their performance in three-point bending tests, and their effect on functionality, applicability, and usability. The experimental investigation yielded clear findings regarding the usability and functionality of the proposed algorithm. However, the findings indicate that although the overall process is usable, improvements are required to streamline the algorithm in order to avoid geometry generation errors and to make it more user-friendly. This approach presents a low-cost, customizable alternative to commercial lattice generation tools, with direct integration in Rhino 8 and Grasshopper®.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Material Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9, 1060 Wien, Austria

High Tech Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, University of Applied Sciences, Hochschule Campus Wien, Favoritenstraße 226, 1100 Wien, Austria

Civil Engineering and Construction Management, Department of Building and Design, University of Applied Sciences, Hochschule Campus Wien, Favoritenstraße 226, 1100 Wien, Austria

Funding

Hochschule Campus Wien

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Griffiths, L. (2025, April 18). Tctmagazine. Available online: https://www.tctmagazine.com/additive-manufacturing-3d-printing-news/materialisee-%20stage-support-generation-for-metal-3d-printing/.
2. Dimopoulos, A., Salimi, M., Gan, T.-H., and Chatzakos, P. (2023). Support Structures Optimisation for High-Quality Metal Additive Manufacturing with Laser Powder Bed Fusion: A Numerical Simulation Study. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16227164 ↗
3. Stanciu Birlescu, A., and Balc, N. (2023). Computational Model for Tree-like Fractals Used as Internal Structures for Additive Manufacturing Parts. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011187 ↗
4. Towards the optimal design of support structures for laser powder bed fusion-based metal additive manufacturing via thermal equivalent static loads
5. Consideration of SLM additive manufacturing supports on the stability of flexible structures in finish milling10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.027 ↗
6. Egan, P.F. (2023). Design for Additive Manufacturing: Recent Innovations and Future Directions. Designs, 7.10.3390/designs7040083 ↗
7. Stiefelbauer, A. Application of Biomimetics and Computational Structure Optimization Process for Product Development-Using the Example of an Additive Manufactured Skibinding. [Master’s Thesis, University of Applied Sciences Vienna-Hochschule Campus Wien]. Available online: https://pub.hcw.ac.at/obvfcwmetaonly/content/titleinfo/6612994.
8. Tyflopoulos, E., Flem, D.T., Steinert, M., and Olsen, A. (2025, September 12). State of the Art of Generative Design and Topology Optimization and Potential Research Needs. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2586059.
9. (2025, July 18). General Motors Seat Clamp. Available online: https://www.sculpteo.com/de/3d-lernzentrum/erstellung-einer-druckbaren-3d-datei/generatives-design/.
10. Brief overview of generative design support software
11. Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for Additive Manufacturing
12. Architected materials informatics: Construction and application to cellular-structured heat sink optimization10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120557 ↗
13. Bending behavior of octet-truss lattice structures: Modelling options, numerical characterization and experimental validation10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109693 ↗
14. Majari, P., Olvera-Trejo, D., Estrada-Díaz, J.A., Elías-Zúñiga, A., Martinez-Romero, O., Ramírez-Herrera, C.A., and Perales-Martínez, I.A. (2025). Enhanced Lightweight Structures Through Brachistochrone-Inspired Lattice Design. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17050654 ↗
15. Geyer, S., and Hölzl, C. (2024). Comparison of CAD Software for Designing Cellular Structures for Additive Manufacturing. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14083306 ↗
16. Geyer, S., Schwemmer, J., and Hölzl, C. (2025). Development and Evaluation of Customized Bike Saddle Pads Using Innovative Design for AM Approaches and Suitable Additive Manufacturing Processes. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010472 ↗
17. nTopology, Inc. (2025, July 08). nTop. Available online: https://www.ntop.com/.
18. Altair Engineering Inc. (2025, July 08). Sulis. Available online: https://www.altair.com/sulis/.
19. Altair Engineering Inc. (2025, July 08). Inspire. Available online: https://altair.com/inspire/.
20. Carbon Inc. (2025, July 08). Design Engine Pro. Available online: https://www.carbon3d.com/products/carbon-design-engine.
21. (2025, July 08). Autodesk Netfabb Ultimate. Available online: https://www.autodesk.com/de/products/netfabb/overview?plc=F360NFP&term=1-YEAR&support=ADVANCED&quantity=1&tab=subscription.
22. Metafold 3D (2025, July 08). Metafold. Available online: https://www.metafold3d.com/.
23. Shields, G. (2024, April 19). All3DP. Available online: https://all3dp.com/1/3d-printing-lattice-structures-the-ultimate-guide/.
24. Boschetto, A., Bottini, L., Macera, L., and Vatanparast, S. (2023). Additive Manufacturing for Lightweighting Satellite Platform. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13052809 ↗
25. Assessment on the use of additive manufacturing technologies for acoustic applications10.1007/s00170-020-05853-2 ↗
26. Design of Shoe Soles Using Lattice Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing10.1017/dsi.2019.76 ↗
27. Harish, A., Alsaleh, N.A., Ahmadein, M., Elfar, A.A., Djuansjah, J., Hassanin, H., El-Sayed, M.A., and Essa, K. (2024). Designing Lightweight 3D-Printable Bioinspired Structures for Enhanced Compression and Energy Absorption Properties. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16060729 ↗
28. Chen, L., Zhang, R., Chu, X., and Liu, H. (2023). Multiscale Design of Graded Stochastic Cellular Structures for the Heat Transfer Problem. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13074409 ↗
29. (2025, July 08). Grasshopper 3D, Grasshopper. Available online: https://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
30. (2025, July 08). Robert McNeel & Associates, Rhino 7. Available online: https://www.rhino3d.com/.
31. Efstathiadis, A., Symeonidou, I., Tsongas, K., Tzimtzimis, E.K., and Tzetzis, D. (2023). Parametric Design and Mechanical Characterization of 3D-Printed PLA Composite Biomimetic Voronoi Lattices Inspired by the Stereom of Sea Urchins. Compos. Sci., 7.10.3390/designs7050113 ↗
32. Flexible lattice structure using curved struts based on body-centered cubic structure
33. Characterization of L-PBF lattice structures geometric defects10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.033 ↗
34. A Newly Modeling Procedure for Different Morphological Distributions of Unit Cells in Lattice Structure with Constant Relative Density
35. A Novel Dual Curved Cubic (DCC) structure with improved compressive strength10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110186 ↗
36. Porterfield, A. (2025, July 08). Crystallon. Available online: https://www.food4rhino.com/en/app/crystallon?page=2&lang=de#commentsSection.
37. (2025, July 08). EcrLabs, Dendro. Available online: https://www.ecrlabs.com/dendro/.
38. Kurtz, A. (2025, July 08). Intralattice. Available online: http://www.intralattice.com/.
39. Pryor, M. (2025, July 08). Pufferfish. Available online: https://www.grasshopper3d.com/group/pufferfish.
40. SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 ↗
41. Jaroš, J., Vaverka, O., Senck, S., and Koutný, D. (2024). Influence of Process Energy on the Formation of Imperfections in Body-Centered Cubic Cells with Struts in the Vertical Orientation Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion from the Magnesium Alloy WE43. Micromachines, 15.10.3390/mi15020278 ↗
42. Siebertz, K., Van Bebber, D., and Hochkirchen, T. (2017). Statistische Versuchsplanung, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-55743-3 ↗
43. Montgomery, D.C. (2013). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
44. (2025, July 04). EOS GmbH. MDS EOS PA2200. Available online: https://www.eos.info/polymer-solutions/polymer-materials/data-sheets/mds-pa-2200.
45. Decker, T., and Kedziora, S. (2024). Optimizing the Thickness of Functionally Graded Lattice Structures for High-Performance Energy Absorption: A Case Study Based on a Bicycle Helmet. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14072788 ↗
46. Papazoglou, D.P., NeidhardDoll, A.T., Pinnell, M.F., Erdahl, D.S., and Osborn, T.H. (2024). Compression and Tensile Testing of L-PBF Ti-6Al-4V Lattice Structures with Biomimetic Porosities and Strut Geometries for Orthopedic Implants. Metals, 14.10.3390/met14020232 ↗
47. (2025). Plastics—Determination of Flexural Properties (Standard No. ISO 178:2019).
48. Autodesk Inc. (2025, July 08). Fusion 360. Available online: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/overview?term=1-YEAR&tab=subscription.
49. Mostafa, K.G., Momesso, G.A., Li, X., Nobes, D.S., and Qureshi, A.J. (2021). Dual Graded Lattice Structures: Generation Framework and Mechanical Properties Characterization. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13091528 ↗
50. Yang, L., Han, C., Wu, H., Hao, L., Wei, Q., Yan, C., and Shi, Y. (2020). Insights into unit cell size effect on mechanical responses and energy absorption capability of titanium graded porous structures manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 109.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103843 ↗
51. Li, Y., Jiang, D., Zhao, R., Wang, X., Wang, L., and Zhang, L.-C. (2024). High Mechanical Performance of Lattice Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing. Metals, 14.10.3390/met14101165 ↗
52. Di Prima, M., Van Belleghem, S., Badhe, Y., Snodderly, K., Porter, D., Burchi, A., and Gilmour, L. (2024). Build parameter influence on strut thickness and mechanical performance in additively manufactured titanium lattice structures. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 151.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106369 ↗
53. Nechi, D. Evaluation of Different Software Solutions with Regard to the Generation of Lattice Structures for Additively Manufactured Components. [Master’s Thesis, University of Applied Sciences Vienna-Hochschule Campus Wien]. Available online: https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-fhcw:1-104773.
54. Investigation of the load-bearing capacity of Co-Cr Lattice Structures fabricated by selective laser melting
55. Distefano, F., Pasta, S., and Epasto, G. (2023). Titanium Lattice Structures Produced via Additive Manufacturing for a Bone Scaffold: A Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14030125 ↗
56. Effective Mechanical Properties of AlSi7Mg Additively Manufactured Cubic Lattice Structures. 3D Print
57. AlSi10Mg hollow-strut lattice metamaterials by laser powder bed fusion10.1039/D3MA00813D ↗