journal article·2025-09-20Open access

Defining Robust NVH Requirements for an Electrified Powertrain Mounting System Based on Solution Space During Early Phase of Development

José G. Cóndor López, Karsten Finger, Sven Herold

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 18

Abstract

Electrification introduces additional NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) challenges during the development of powertrain mounting systems due to high-frequency excitations from the powertrain and the absence of masking effects from the combustion engine. In these frequency ranges, engine mounts can stiffen up to a factor of five due to continuum resonances, reducing their structure-borne sound isolation properties and negatively impacting the customer’s NVH perception. Common hardening factors used during elastomer mount development are therefore limited in terms of their applicable validation frequency range. This study presents a methodology for determining decoupled permissible stiffness ranges for a double-isolated mounting system up to 1500 Hz, based on solution space engineering. Instead of optimizing for a single best design, we seek to maximize solution boxes, resulting in robust stiffness ranges that ensure the fulfillment of the formulated system requirements. These ranges serve as NVH requirements at the component level, derived from the sound pressure level at the seat location. They provide tailored guidelines for mount development, such as geometric design or optimal resonance placement, while simultaneously offering maximum flexibility by spanning the solution space. The integration of machine learning approaches enables the application of large-scale finite-element models within the framework of solution space analysis by reducing the computational time by a factor of 7.19·103. From a design process standpoint, this facilitates frontloading by accelerating the evaluation phase as suppliers can directly benchmark their mounting concepts against the permissible ranges and immediately verify compliance with the defined targets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Engineering Applied Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mercedes-Benz AG, 71059 Sindelfingen, Germany

Fraunhofer Institute for Structural Durability and System Reliability LBF, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimization of thePowertrain Noise for the Electric Vehicle Mercedes-Benz EQC10.1007/s38311-020-0200-6 ↗
2. Vibroacoustic Metamaterials for Reduced Sound Radiation of an Electric Powertrain10.1007/s38313-023-1436-5 ↗
3. Wellmann, T., Tousignant, T., Govindswamy, K., Tomazic, D., Steffens, C., and Janssen, P. (2019, January 10–13). NVH Aspects of Electric Drive Unit Development and Vehicle Integration. Proceedings of the Noise and Vibration Conference & Exhibition, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.10.4271/2019-01-1454 ↗
4. Challenges for Vehicle NVH and Acoustics Due to Electric Mobility10.1007/s38311-022-1430-6 ↗
5. (2025, September 16). eMobility Fahrzeug-Studie 2021. Available online: https://www.p3-group.com/p3-updates/p3-charging-index-2024/#:~:text=Der%20P3%20Charging%20Index%20wurde,reale%20Reichweite%20in%20Kilometern%20nachzuladen.
6. Tschöke, H., Gutzmer, P., and Pfund, T. (2019). Akustik. Elektrifizierung des Antriebsstrangs: Grundlagen-vom Mikro-Hybrid zum Vollelektrischen Antrieb, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-60356-7 ↗
7. Münder, M., and Carbon, C.C. (2022). A literature review [2000–2022] on vehicle acoustics: Investigations on perceptual parameters of interior soundscapes in electrified vehicles. Front. Mech. Eng., 8.10.3389/fmech.2022.974464 ↗
8. Nataraja S, M., Rao, M., Raghavendran, P., and Selvam, E. (2024, January 23–25). NVH Refinement of Structure-Borne Tonal Noise in Electric Vehicle. Proceedings of the Symposium on International Automotive Technology, Pune, India.
9. Transfer Stiffness Characterization of Elastomer Mounts at High Frequencies
10. Kruse, E., Sell, H., and Loecken, F. (2023, January 15–18). Electric Motor Mounting System Validation with Subsystem and Powered e-Axle Tests. Proceedings of the Noise and Vibration Conference & Exhibition, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.10.4271/2023-01-1097 ↗
11. Topology optimization of nonlinear elastomer engine mounts considering the transfer behavior10.1007/s10010-025-00834-x ↗
12. Stoll, G., Atzrodt, H., Hansen, T., Hülsebrock, M., and Kleinfeller, N. (2024, January 9–14). Application of vibroacoustic metamaterial to compensate continuum resonance in powertrain mounting systems for electric vehicles. Proceedings of the 2024 Eighteenth International Congress on Artificial Materials for Novel Wave Phenomena (Metamaterials), Chania, Greece.10.1109/Metamaterials62190.2024.10703315 ↗
13. Cóndor López, J., Stumpf, J., and Freitag, H.G. (2022, January 12–14). Robust design optimization of nonlinear powertrain mounting systems with solution space engineering. Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA 2022) and International Conference on Uncertainty in Structural Dynamics (USD 2022), Leuven, Belgium.
14. Grimm, A., Finger, K., Stoll, G., Atzrodt, H., and Herold, S. (2018, January 26–28). Implementation of a modular model for active engine mounts and coupling with a reduced model for full-vehicle NVH-simulation. Proceedings of the Aachen Acoustics Colloquium 2018, Aachen, Germany.
15. Set-based design of mechanical systems with design robustness integrated10.1504/IJPD.2014.060037 ↗
16. Computing solution spaces for robust design10.1002/nme.4450 ↗
17. Pfeffer, P. (2016, January 14–15). Resolving conflicts of goals in complex design processes—Application to the design of engine mount systems. Proceedings of the 7th International Munich Chassis Symposium, Munich, Germany.
18. Xu, D. (2024). Vibration and Noise Reduction Using Solution Spaces. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Munich].
19. Heintzel, A. (2023, January 11–12). Requirement Definition for a Vibration Source Using Transfer Path Analysis and Solution Spaces. Proceedings of the Automotive Acoustics Conference 2023, Rueschlikon, Switzerland.
20. Horváth, K., and Zelei, A. (2024). Simulating Noise, Vibration, and Harshness Advances in Electric Vehicle Powertrains: Strategies and Challenges. World Electr. Veh. J., 15.10.3390/wevj15080367 ↗
21. Zeller, P. (2018). Handbuch Fahrzeugakustik: Grundlagen, Auslegung, Berechnung, Versuch, Springer Vieweg.10.1007/978-3-658-18520-6 ↗
22. Fiedler, U., Visser, R., and Kreissig, V. (2023, January 11–12). Interior noise optimization of powertrain induced vibrations for an electric vehicle using machine learning methods. Proceedings of the Automotive Acoustics Conference, Rueschlikon, Switzerland.
23. Cóndor López, J., Hansen, T., Weber, A., Kleinfeller, N., and Finger, K. (2024, January 18–21). Gezielte Modifikation des Übertragungsverhaltens von Elastomerlagern durch den Einsatz von vibro-akustischen Metamaterialien. Proceedings of the Fortschritte der Akustik—DAGA 2024, Hannover, Germany.
24. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
25. Hughes, A., and Grawoig, D. (1971). Statistics, a Foundation for Analysis, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
26. Stumpf, J., Naumann, T., Vogt, M., Duddeck, F., and Zimmermann, M. (2020, January 12–14). On the Treatment of Equality Constraints in Mechanical Systems Design Subject to Uncertainty. Proceedings of the NordDesign 2020, Lyngby, Denmark.10.35199/NORDDESIGN2020.24 ↗
27. On the design of large systems subject to uncertainty10.1080/09544828.2017.1303664 ↗