DCmal-2025: A Novel Routing-Based DisConnectivity Malware—Development, Impact, and Countermeasures
Source abstract
Abstract
Operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS include built-in commands that enable administrators to perform essential tasks. These same commands can be exploited by attackers for malicious purposes that may go undetected by traditional security solutions. This research identifies an unmitigated risk of misuse of a standard command to disconnect network services on victim devices. Thus, we developed a novel Proof-of-Concept (PoC) malware named DCmal-2025 and documented every step of its lifecycle, including the core idea of the malware, its development, impact, analysis, and possible countermeasures. The proposed DCmal-2025 malware can cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition without exploiting any software vulnerabilities; instead, it misuses legitimate standard commands and manipulates the routing table to achieve this. We developed two types of DCmal-2025: one that triggers a DoS immediately and another that initiates it after a predefined delay before restoring connectivity. This study evaluated 72 antivirus detection rates of two malware types (DCmal-2025 Type 1 and Type 2) written in C and Rust using VirusTotal. The source code for both types was undetected by any of the antivirus engines. However, after compiling the source code into executable files, only some Windows executables were flagged by general keywords unrelated to DCmal-2024 behaviour; Linux executables remained undetected. Rust significantly reduced detection rates compared to C—from 7.04% to 1.39% for Type 1 and from 9.72% to 4.17% for Type 2. An educational institution was chosen as a case study. The institution’s network topology was simulated using the GNS3 simulator. The result of the case study reveals that both malware types could cause a successful DoS attack by disconnecting targeted devices from all network-based services. The findings underscore the need for enhanced detection methods and heightened awareness that unexplained network disconnections may be caused by undetected malware, such as DCmal-2025.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Cryptographic Implementations and Security
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
King Abdullah II School of Information Technology, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
Intelligent Cybersecurity Engineering Research Group (ICE), The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
Funding
University of Jordan
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Aboaoja, F.A., Zainal, A., Ghaleb, F.A., Al-rimy, B.A.S., Eisa, T.A.E., and Elnour, A.A.H. (2022). Malware Detection Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions: A Survey. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178482 ↗
2. Aslan, Ö., Aktuğ, S.S., Ozkan-Okay, M., Yilmaz, A.A., and Akin, E. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Cyber Security Vulnerabilities, Threats, Attacks, and Solutions. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12061333 ↗
3. Malware Detection: Issues and Challenges10.1088/1742-6596/1807/1/012011 ↗
4. Impact of cyber-attacks on the financial institutions10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.267 ↗
5. Akhtar, Z. (2021). Malware Detection and Analysis: Challenges and Research Opportunities. arXiv.
6. Almomani, I., Maglaras, L.A., Ferrag, M.A., and Ayres, N. (2024). Cyber Malware: Offensive and Defensive Systems, Springer. [1st ed.]. Security Informatics and Law Enforcement.10.1007/978-3-031-34969-0 ↗
7. DeepStrike (2025, June 06). 50+ Malware Statistics 2025: Attacks, Trends and Infections. Available online: https://deepstrike.io/blog/Malware-Attacks-and-Infections-2025.
8. AV-TEST Institute (2025, July 06). Malware Statistics & Trends Report. Available online: https://www.av-test.org/en/statistics/malware/.
9. Positive Technologies (2025, September 15). Cybersecurity Threatscape: Q1 2024. Available online: https://global.ptsecurity.com/en/research/analytics/cybersecurity-threatscape-2024-q1/.
10. Barr-Smith, F., Ugarte-Pedrero, X., Graziano, M., Spolaor, R., and Martinovic, I. (2021, January 24–27). Survivalism: Systematic analysis of windows malware living-off-the-land. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/SP40001.2021.00047 ↗
11. A review of state-of-the-art malware attack trends and defense mechanisms10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3328351 ↗
12. Khalifa, M.A., Almomani, I., and El-Shafai, W. (2024, January 24–27). SAMA: A Comprehensive Smart Automated Malware Analyzer Empowered by ChatGPT Integration. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 30th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), Amman, Jordan.10.1109/ICT62760.2024.10606026 ↗
13. Medhi, D., and Ramasamy, K. (2018). Chapter 3—Routing Protocols: Framework and Principles. Network Routing: Algorithms, Protocols, and Architectures, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-800737-2.00004-1 ↗
14. Cisco Press (2018). Routing Concepts. Routing and Switching Essentials v6 Companion Guide, Cisco Press.
15. Aljawawdeh, H., and Almomani, I. (2013, January 3–5). Dynamic Load Balancing Protocol (DLBP) for Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT), Amman, Jordan.10.1109/AEECT.2013.6716430 ↗
16. DDoS in the IoT: Mirai and other botnets10.1109/MC.2017.201 ↗
17. Silva, R.M., Silva, R., Pinto, B., Salles, R., and Junior, O.D. (2013, January 29–31). Botnets: A survey. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT), Reykjavík, Iceland.
18. Kolesnik, V., and Rolik, O. (2021, January 5–7). The quality management of critical IT infrastructure disturbed by denial of service attacks. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Problems of Infocommunications, Science and Technology (PIC S&T), Kharkiv, Ukraine.10.1109/PICST54195.2021.9772229 ↗
19. The Importance of Network Security in Protecting Sensitive Data and Information10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.906024 ↗
20. Nguyen, N.T., Manolopoulos, Y., Chbeir, R., Kozierkiewicz, A., and Trawiński, B. (2022, January 20–30). Towards Optimizing Malware Detection: An Approach Based on Generative Adversarial Networks and Transformers. Proceedings of the Computational Collective Intelligence, Hammamet, Tunisia.10.1007/978-3-031-16014-1 ↗
21. CrowdStrike (2025, September 15). ARP Spoofing: What It Is & How to Prevent It. Available online: https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/cybersecurity-101/social-engineering/arp-spoofing/.
22. Countering ARP Spoofing Attacks in Software-Defined Networks using a Game-Theoretic Approach10.1016/j.cose.2023.103696 ↗
23. A New Approach for Detecting and Mitigating Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) Poisoning
24. Saritakumar, N., Anusuya, K.V., and Ajitha, S. (2021, January 7–8). Detection and Mitigation of ARP Poisoning Attack in Software Defined Network. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Combinatorial and Optimization, ICCAP 2021, Chennai, India.
25. D-ARP: An Efficient Scheme to Detect and Prevent ARP Spoofing10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172329 ↗
26. Security problems in the TCP/IP protocol suite10.1145/378444.378449 ↗
27. Feng, X., Li, Q., Sun, K., Yang, Y., and Xu, K. (2023, January 21–25). Man-in-the-Middle Attacks without Rogue AP: When WPAs Meet ICMP Redirects. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179441 ↗
28. Exploiting Cross-Layer Vulnerabilities: Off-Path Attacks on the TCP/IP Protocol Suite10.1145/3689819 ↗
29. Feng, X., Li, Q., Sun, K., Qian, Z., Zhao, G., Kuang, X., Fu, C., and Xu, K. (2022, January 10–12). Off-Path Network Traffic Manipulation via Revitalized ICMP Redirect Attacks. Proceedings of the 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 2022), Boston, MA, USA. Available online: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec22-feng.pdf.
30. Feng, X., Li, Q., Sun, K., Yang, Y., and Xu, K. (2023, January 28–30). Traffic Hijacking in Wi-Fi Networks via ICMP Redirects. Proceedings of the ACM Turing Award Celebration Conference—China 2023, Wuhan, China.10.1145/3603165.3607441 ↗
31. Birge-Lee, H., Apostolaki, M., and Rexford, J. (2024). Global BGP Attacks that Evade Route Monitoring. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-85960-1_14 ↗
32. Cho, S., Fontugne, R., Cho, K., Dainotti, A., and Gill, P. (2019, January 19–21). BGP hijacking classification. Proceedings of the 2019 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), Paris, France.10.23919/TMA.2019.8784511 ↗
33. Chuat, L., Legner, M., Basin, D., Hausheer, D., Hitz, S., Müller, P., and Perrig, A. (2022). The Complete Guide to SCION: From Design Principles to Formal Verification. Information Security and Cryptography, Springer. Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-05288-0.10.1007/978-3-031-05288-0 ↗
34. Nakashima, K., Harayama, M., and Mishima, M. (2024, January 28–31). Detection of BGP Hijacking based on AS Hegemony. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC), Taipei, China.10.1109/ICEIC61013.2024.10457231 ↗
35. Furuness, J., Morris, C., Wang, B., Morillo, R., Herzberg, A., and Kasiliya, A. (2025, January 23–28). Securing BGP ASAP: ASPA and Other Post-ROV Defenses. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS 2025), San Diego, CA, USA.10.14722/ndss.2025.240675 ↗
36. Holterbach, T., Alfroy, T., Phokeer, A., Dainotti, A., and Pelsser, C. (2024, January 16–18). A System to Detect Forged-Origin BGP Hijacks. Proceedings of the 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’24), Santa Clara, CA, USA. Available online: https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi24/presentation/holterbach.
37. Wong, K.C.O. (2024). Classifying and Identifying BGP Hijacking attacks on the internet. [Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University Graduate School].
38. On the Effectiveness of BGP Hijackers That Evade Public Route Collectors10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3261128 ↗
39. Identifying OSPF LSA falsification attacks through non-linear analysis10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107031 ↗
40. Chung, J.M. (2024). TCP/IP Protocols and IP Routing. Emerging Secure Networks, Blockchains and Smart Contract Technologies, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-65866-2 ↗
41. Jony, A., and Islam, M.N. (2023, January 21–23). An Effective Technique to Automatically Detect and Neutralize Rogue DHCP Server. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainable Development (ICICT4SD), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICICT4SD59951.2023.10303033 ↗
42. Dilworth, R. (2025). Dark Deceptions in DHCP: Dismantling Network Defenses. arXiv.
43. DHCP DoS and starvation attacks on SDN controllers and their mitigation10.1007/s11416-023-00483-0 ↗
44. Palo Alto Networks PSIRT (2025, September 15). CVE-2024-3661 Impact of TunnelVision Vulnerability. Available online: https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2024-3661.
45. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (2025, September 15). DNSChanger Malware, Available online: https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/dns-changer-malware.pdf/view.
46. Proofpoint (2025, September 15). Home Routers Under Attack via DNSChanger Malware. Available online: https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/home-routers-under-attack-dnschanger-malware-windows-android-devices.
47. Poornachandran, P., Sreeram, R., Krishnan, M.R., Pal, S., Prem Sankar, A.U., and Ashok, A. (2015, January 21–23). Internet of Vulnerable Things (IoVT): Detecting Vulnerable SOHO Routers. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), Bhubaneswar, India.10.1109/ICIT.2015.49 ↗
48. Kaspersky Lab (2025, September 15). Slingshot: The spy that came in from the router, 2021. Section: Resource Center. Available online: https://www.kaspersky.com/about/press-releases/2018_slingshot.
49. (2025, September 15). Securelist (Kaspersky Lab). The Slingshot APT FAQ, Available online: https://securelist.com/apt-slingshot/84312/.
50. Antonakakis, M., April, T., Bailey, M., Bernhard, M., Bursztein, E., Cochran, J., Durumeric, Z., Halderman, J.A., Invernizzi, L., and Kallitsis, M. (2017, January 16–18). Understanding the Mirai Botnet. Proceedings of the 26th USENIX security symposium (USENIX Security 17), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
51. Auliar, R.B., and Bekaroo, G. (2021, January 7–8). Security in IoT-based Smart Homes: A Taxonomy Study of Detection Methods of Mirai Malware and Countermeasures. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME), Mauritius.10.1109/ICECCME52200.2021.9590841 ↗
52. BleepingComputer (2025, September 15). Switcher Android Malware Hacks TP-Link Routers, Changes DNS Settings. Available online: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/switcher-android-malware-hacks-tp-link-routers-changes-dns-settings/.
53. Almomani, I., Ahmed, M., and El-Shafai, W. (2022). Android malware analysis in a nutshell. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0270647 ↗
54. PSafe Blog (2025, September 15). Switcher Trojan: A New Malware Affecting Android Devices. Available online: https://www.psafe.com/en/blog/switcher-trojan-new-malware-affecting-android-devices/.
55. Goodin, D. (2025, September 15). VPNFilter Malware Infecting 500,000 Devices Is Worse Than We Thought. Available online: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/06/vpnfilter-malware-infecting-50000-devices-is-worse-than-we-thought/.
56. Marinos, L., and Lourenco, M. (2018). ENISA Threat Landscape 2018, Publications Office of the European Union.
57. Sapalo Sicato, J.C., Sharma, P.K., Loia, V., and Park, J.H. (2019). VPNFilter Malware Analysis on Cyber Threat in Smart Home Network. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9132763 ↗
58. (2025, May 02). Vardi, Ofek, M.M. Cato CTRL Threat Research: Ballista—New IoT Botnet Targeting Thousands of TP-Link Archer Routers, 2025. Cato Networks. Available online: https://www.catonetworks.com/blog/cato-ctrl-ballista-new-iot-botnet-targeting-thousands-of-tp-link-archer-routers/.
59. Alquran, R., Al Jamal, M., Aljaidi, M., AL-Jamal, M., Khassawneh, B., Alsarhan, A., Alidmat, O., Samara, G., and Almatarneh, S. (2024, January 10–12). Machine Learning as the Shield: Mitigating ARP Poisoning Attacks in Software Defined Networks. Proceedings of the 2024 25th International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT), Zarqa, Jordan.10.1109/ACIT62805.2024.10877217 ↗
60. IoT and man-in-the-middle attacks10.1002/spy2.70016 ↗
61. MITRE Corporation (2025, July 04). MITRE ATT&CK Framework. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/.
62. (2025, June 23). VirusTotal. Available online: https://www.virustotal.com/.
63. Gartner Peer Insights (2025, September 15). Voice of the Customer for Endpoint Protection Platforms. Recognized CrowdStrike as a Customers’ Choice Based on Surveys of Over 600 Enterprise Users. Available online: https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/crowdstrike-named-customers-choice-2025-gartner-voice-of-customer-epp-report/.
64. (2025, September 15). Technology, S. SecureAge Data-Centric Security Solutions. Trusted by Governments, Institutes, and Corporations; 19-Year Transparent Breach History. Available online: https://www.secureage.com/.
65. Haley, K. (2025, September 15). Symantec Enterprise is Here to Stay. Symantec Confirmed as #1 in IDC’s 2019 Corporate Endpoint Security Market Share Report. Available online: https://www.security.com/product-insights/symantec-enterprise-here-stay.
66. Bkav Corporation (2025, June 24). Introducing the Suite of Bkav Pro Antivirus Products to Agencies and Distributors. Available online: https://www.bkav.com/top-news/-/view-content/1242054/introducing-the-suite-of-bkav-pro-antivirus-products-to-agencies-and-distributors.
67. (2025, September 15). Max Secure Software. Anti-Virus Protection Software for Windows, Mac and Android. Official Product Download and Information Page. Available online: https://www.maxpcsecure.com/.
68. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Android Permissions System10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041432 ↗
69. (2025, September 15). Security.org. Antivirus Consumer Report Annual. Statistics on Consumer Antivirus Use in the U.S. Available online: https://www.security.org/antivirus/antivirus-consumer-report-annual/.
70. Raffa, G., Sgandurra, D., and O’Keeffe, D. (2022, January 17–20). Evaluating Anti-Virus Effectiveness in Linux. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Osaka, Japan.10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020475 ↗
71. Fishbein, N., and Guerrero-Saade, J.A. (2024, January 2–4). Project 0xA11C: Deoxidizing the Rust Malware Ecosystem. Proceedings of the Virus Bulletin Conference 2024, Dublin, Ireland.
72. Ehrnschwender, M. (2025, September 15). Digging Through Rust to Find Gold—Extracting Secrets from Rust Malware. Binary Defense Blog. Available online: https://www.binarydefense.com/resources/blog/digging-through-rust-to-find-gold-extracting-secrets-from-rust-malware/.
73. Deep Instinct (2025, July 20). Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)|Deep Instinct. Available online: https://www.deepinstinct.com/endpoint-detection-response.
74. Elastic Security (2025, July 20). Endpoint Security|Elastic. Available online: https://www.elastic.co/security/endpoint-security.
75. Wiki, C.S. (2025, July 20). Rising AntiVirus. Available online: https://computersecurity.fandom.com/wiki/Rising_AntiVirus.
76. Federal Bureau of Investigation Internet Crime Complaint Center (2025, July 23). Internet Crime Report 2024, Available online: https://www.ic3.gov/AnnualReport/Reports/2024_IC3Report.pdf.