LLM-Assisted Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Solving Distributed Heterogeneous No-Wait Permutation Flowshop Scheduling
Source abstract
Abstract
In distributed manufacturing systems, minimizing completion time and improving resource utilization are critical for enhancing operational efficiency. Conventional scheduling models for centralized flowshops struggle to capture the complexity of distributed heterogeneous systems, while existing studies often overlook the combined challenges of heterogeneous factories, no-wait constraints, and sequence-dependent setup times (SDST). This study focuses on the distributed heterogeneous no-wait permutation flowshop scheduling problem with SDST (DHNPFSP-SDST), which is proven NP-hard via polynomial reduction to the classic permutation flowshop scheduling problem (PFSP). We first establish a bi-objective optimization model to simultaneously minimize makespan and total machine non-working time, serving as a standard experimental foundation. The core innovation is a large language model-assisted non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (LLM-NSGAII), Through a structured prompt framework, LLM-NSGAII leverages LLM’s zero-shot in-context learning to dynamically orchestrate selection, crossover, and mutation operations—replacing the fixed operators of traditional NSGAII. Experiments on extended benchmarks show that when compared with mainstream, multi-objective algorithms demonstrate competitiveness across most instances and provide a proof of concept for integrating LLMs with evolutionary algorithms, opening new avenues for algorithmic optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Optimization and Search Problems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xian Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Guangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Guangzhou 510555, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Digital twin for smart manufacturing. A review
2. Differential evolution algorithm for hybrid flow-shop scheduling problems10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2011.05.011 ↗
3. Decomposition-based multi-objective optimization for energy-aware distributed hybrid flowshop scheduling with multiprocessor tasks10.26599/TST.2021.9010007 ↗
4. Multiobjective flexible job shop scheduling using memetic algorithms10.1109/TASE.2013.2274517 ↗
5. A distributed heterogeneous permutation flowshop scheduling problem with lot-streaming and carryover sequence-dependent setup time10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100804 ↗
6. Permutation flowshop scheduling with batch delivery to multiple customers in supply chains10.1109/TSMC.2017.2720178 ↗
7. Multiobjective local search algorithm-based decomposition for multiobjective permutation flowshop scheduling problem10.1109/TEM.2015.2453264 ↗
8. An improved artificial bee colony algorithm with q-learning for solving permutation flow-shop scheduling problems10.1109/TSMC.2022.3219380 ↗
9. A modified adaptive switching-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm for distributed heterogeneous flowshop scheduling with lot-streaming10.1016/j.swevo.2023.101353 ↗
10. Distributed heterogeneous co-evolutionary algorithm for scheduling a multistage fine-manufacturing system with setup constraints10.1109/TCYB.2022.3217074 ↗
11. An ant colony optimization behavior-based moea/d for distributed heterogeneous hybrid flowshop scheduling problem under nonidentical time-of-use electricity tariffs10.1109/TASE.2021.3119353 ↗
12. Double DQN-based coevolution for green distributed heterogeneous hybrid flowshop scheduling with multiple priorities of jobs10.1109/TASE.2023.3327792 ↗
13. A reinforcement learning driven cooperative meta-heuristic algorithm for energy-efficient distributed no-wait flow-shop scheduling with sequence-dependent setup time10.1109/TII.2022.3218645 ↗
14. Distributed scheduling problems in intelligent manufacturing systems10.26599/TST.2021.9010009 ↗
15. A discrete artificial bee colony algorithm for the distributed heterogeneous no-wait flowshop scheduling problem10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106946 ↗
16. Liu, S., Chen, C., Qu, X., Tang, K., and Ong, Y.S. (July, January 30). Large language models as evolutionary optimizers. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Yokohama, Japan.
17. Huang, Y., Zhang, W., Feng, L., Wu, X., and Tan, K.C. (2024). How multimodal integration boost the performance of LLM for optimization: Case study on capacitated vehicle routing problems. arXiv.10.1109/MCII64973.2025.11032980 ↗
18. Evolutionary computation in the era of large language model: Survey and roadmap10.1109/TEVC.2024.3506731 ↗
19. Brahmachary, S., Joshi, S.M., Panda, A., Koneripalli, K., Sagotra, A.K., Patel, H., Sharma, A., Jagtap, A.D., and Kalyanaraman, K. (2024). Large language model-based evolutionary optimizer: Reasoning with elitism. arXiv.10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129272 ↗
20. Chiquier, M., Mall, U., and Vondrick, C. (2024). Evolving interpretable visual classifiers with large language models. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-73039-9_11 ↗
21. Leung, J., and Shen, Z. (2024, January 13–15). Prompt Engineering for Curriculum Design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Technology, Wuhan, China.
22. Haneef, F., Varalakshmi, M., and P U, P.M. (2025, January 21–23). Leveraging RAG for Effective Prompt Engineering in Job Portals. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Okayama, Japan.
23. Loss, L.A., and Dhuvad, P. (2025, January 8–12). From Manual to Automated Prompt Engineering: Evolving LLM Prompts with Genetic Algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Hangzhou, China.10.1109/CEC65147.2025.11043059 ↗
24. A Semantic Controllable Long Text Steganography Framework Based on LLM Prompt Engineering and Knowledge Graph10.1109/LSP.2024.3456636 ↗
25. Genetic improvement of software: A comprehensive survey10.1109/TEVC.2017.2693219 ↗
26. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
27. A reinforcement learning brain storm optimization algorithm (BSO) with learning mechanism10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107645 ↗
28. A reinforcement learning driven artificial bee colony algorithm for distributed heterogeneous no-wait flowshop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times10.1109/TASE.2022.3212786 ↗
29. Iterated greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem10.1016/j.omega.2018.03.004 ↗
30. BRCE: Bi-roles co-evolution for energy-efficient distributed heterogeneous permutation flowshop scheduling with flexible machine speed10.1007/s40747-023-00984-x ↗
31. A survey on the hypervolume indicator in evolutionary multi-objective optimization10.1109/TEVC.2020.3013290 ↗
32. MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759 ↗
33. Zitzler, E., and Künzli, S. (2004, January 18–22). Indicator-based selection in multi-objective search. Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Birmingham, UK.10.1007/978-3-540-30217-9_84 ↗
34. A grid-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization10.1109/TEVC.2012.2227145 ↗
35. Na, S., Jeong, G., Ahn, B.H., Young, J., Krishna, T., and Kim, H. (2024, January 15–17). Understanding Performance Implications of LLM Inference on CPUs. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IISWC63097.2024.00024 ↗
36. Shahandashti, K.K., Sivakumar, M., Mohajer, M.M., Belle, A.B., Wang, S., and Lethbridge, T. (2024, January 14). Assessing the Impact of GPT-4 Turbo in Generating Defeaters for Assurance Cases. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM First International Conference on AI Foundation Models and Software Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.