Integration of Peridynamics and Deep Learning for Efficient and Accurate Thermomechanical Modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate and efficient modeling of thermomechanical failure in critical structures under extreme conditions remains a great challenge. Traditional local methods struggle with discontinuities, such as fractures, while peridynamics (PD) is computationally intensive. This study presents a rapid prediction framework that combines sequential PD thermomechanical coupling simulations with a deep learning (DL) surrogate model. The framework adopts bond-based PD to solve the deformation field, accounting for thermal expansion, whereas the temperature field is handled using the peridynamic differential operator to address boundary effects and enhance transient accuracy. The validation results show that the PD thermomechanical coupling model achieved high accuracy. For example, the cooling simulation results of a 2D plate using PD and FEM show that the results had a global error in temperature and displacement of less than 0.7%. In the Al2O3 ceramic quenching simulations, the crack propagation path is accurately reproduced using the PD model, which matches the experimental data well. To improve the computational efficiency, the DL surrogate model was trained on a large dataset generated by PD simulations. The inputs include the crack geometries and loads, and the outputs are the predicted crack openings, average radial displacement/strain, and circumference change rates. The optimized deep neural network (DNN) consisted of two hidden layers, each with nine neurons. The DNN model predicted complex multi-output responses in approximately 0.5 s, about 1200 times faster than direct PD simulation, maintaining high accuracy. The PD-DL framework offers a new direction for assessing the thermomechanical damage and structural integrity in engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Key Laboratory of Nuclear Reactor Technology, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610213, China
Department of Engineering Mechanics, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Laboratory of Nuclear Reactor Technology
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Engineering critical assessment of RPV with nozzle corner cracks under pressurized thermal shocks10.1016/j.net.2020.04.019 ↗
2. A thermo-mechanical coupling model for simulating the re-entry failure evolution mechanism of spacecraft propulsion module10.1016/j.tws.2022.110504 ↗
3. Chen, W., Dai, S., and Zheng, B. (2022). Continuum damage dynamic model combined with transient elastic equation and heat conduction equation to solve RPV stress. Fractal Fract, 6.10.3390/fractalfract6040215 ↗
4. Numerical fracture analysis of a reactor pressure vessel based on Abaqus-FRANC3D co-simulation method10.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.078 ↗
5. Han, D., Fan, H., Yan, C., Wang, T., Yang, Y., Ali, S., and Wang, G. (2022). Heat conduction and cracking of functionally graded materials using an FDEM-Based thermo-mechanical coupling model. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312279 ↗
6. A comparison between the NMM and the XFEM in discontinuity modeling10.1142/S0219876212400300 ↗
7. Hybrid differential transform method/smoothed particle hydrodynamics and DT/finite difference method for transient heat conduction problems10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104495 ↗
8. Using an improved SPH algorithm to simulate thermo-hydro-mechanical-damage coupling problems in rock masses10.1016/j.csite.2023.103085 ↗
9. MLS-based numerical manifold method based on IPIM for 3D transient heat conduction of FGMs10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124704 ↗
10. MLS-based numerical manifold method for steady-state three-dimensional heat conduction problems of functionally graded materials10.1016/j.camwa.2023.05.032 ↗
11. Three-dimensional phase-field modeling of temperature-dependent thermal shock-induced fracture in ceramic materials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108444 ↗
12. Phase-field modeling and machine learning of electric-thermal-mechanical breakdown of polymer-based dielectrics10.1038/s41467-019-09874-8 ↗
13. An electromechanical coupling peridynamic model for piezoelectric solids with defects10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110679 ↗
14. A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
15. Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
16. Peridynamic investigation on thermal fracturing behavior of ceramic nuclear fuel pellets under power cycles10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.214 ↗
17. A peridynamic thermal contact model for heat conduction analysis of thermally imperfect interface and conductive crack10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.126763 ↗
18. Possible causes of numerical oscillations in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics and a bond-associated higher-order stabilized model10.1016/j.cma.2019.112592 ↗
19. Fully coupled peridynamic thermomechanics10.1016/j.jmps.2013.10.011 ↗
20. A coupled thermo-mechanical bond-based peridynamics for simulating thermal cracking in rocks10.1007/s10704-018-0273-z ↗
21. An improved coupled thermo-mechanic bond-based peridynamic model for cracking behaviors in brittle solids subjected to thermal shocks10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.09.007 ↗
22. Investigation on thermal failure of functionally graded materials using fully coupled thermo-mechanical peridynamics10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116454 ↗
23. A multi-horizon fully coupled thermo-mechanical peridynamics10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105758 ↗
24. Nonlocal thermomechanical coupled analysis of wheel-rail contact using a peridynamic model10.1016/j.wear.2023.204954 ↗
25. Liu, S., Han, F., Deng, X., and Lin, Y. (2023). Thermomechanical peridynamic modeling for ductile fracture. Materials, 16.10.20944/preprints202304.0682.v1 ↗
26. A fully coupled thermo-mechanical peridynamic model for cracking analysis of frozen rocks10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105809 ↗
27. The effects of thermal stresses on the elliptical surface cracks in PWR reactor pressure vessel10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.12.001 ↗
28. Shakedown and limit analyses of a pressurised water reactor vessel nozzle under cyclic thermo-mechanical loadings10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111947 ↗
29. Prediction of compressive mechanical properties of three-dimensional mesoscopic aluminium foam based on deep learning method10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104684 ↗
30. A novel deep learning approach of multiaxial fatigue life-prediction with a self-attention mechanism characterizing the effects of loading history and varying temperature10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106851 ↗
31. High energy absorption design of porous metals using deep learning10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109593 ↗
32. Peridynamic differential operator and its applications10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.028 ↗
33. Fundamental solution-embedded peridynamic differential operator modeling for thermal conduction10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.109991 ↗
34. Hahn, D.W., and Özisik, M.N. (2012). Heat Conduction, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118411285 ↗
35. Direct numerical simulations on crack formation in ceramic materials under thermal shock by using a non-local fracture model10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.04.012 ↗
36. Li, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Bai, X., Shao, X., and Wu, B. (2024). Coupled non-ordinary state-based peridynamics model for ductile and brittle solids subjected to thermal shocks. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14166927 ↗
37. Study on thermal shock failure characteristics of RPV during IVR system start-up for typical advanced PWR10.3389/fenrg.2022.899405 ↗