Spatial–Temporal Physics-Constrained Multilayer Perceptron for Aircraft Trajectory Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
Aircraft trajectory prediction (ATP) is a critical technology for air traffic control (ATC), safeguarding aviation safety and airspace resource management. To address the limitations of existing methods—kinetic models’ susceptibility to environmental disturbances and machine learning’s lack of physical interpretability—this paper proposes a Spatial–Temporal Physics-Constrained Multilayer Perceptron (STPC-MLP) model. The model employs a spatiotemporal attention encoder to decouple timestamps and spatial coordinates (longitude, latitude, altitude), eliminating feature ambiguity caused by mixed representations. By fusing temporal and spatial attention features, it effectively extracts trajectory degradation patterns. Furthermore, a Hidden Physics-Constrained Multilayer Perceptron (HPC-MLP) integrates kinematic equations (e.g., maximum acceleration and minimum turning radius constraints) as physical regularization terms in the loss function, ensuring predictions strictly adhere to aircraft maneuvering principles. Experiments demonstrate that STPC-MLP reduces the trajectory point prediction error (RMSE) by 7.13% compared to a conventional optimal Informer model. In ablation studies, the absence of the HPC-MLP module, attention mechanism, and physical constraint loss terms significantly increased prediction errors, unequivocally validating the efficacy of the STPC-MLP architecture for trajectory prediction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Air Traffic Management and Optimization · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Aerospace and Aviation Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China
Sichuan Jiuzhou Aerocont Technologies Co., Ltd., Mianyang 621700, China
Funding
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) · Sichuan Science and Technology Program, China · Institutional Research Fund from Sichuan University · Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Flight Techniques and Flight Safety
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Cate, K. (2013, January 7–10). Challenges in achieving trajectory-based operations. Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2013-443 ↗
2. An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 201710.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.009 ↗
3. A strategic conflict avoidance approach based on cooperative coevolutionary with the dynamic grouping strategy10.1080/00207721.2014.966282 ↗
4. Characterizing flight delay profiles with a tensor factorization framework10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.024 ↗
5. A multi-view attention-based spatial-temporal network for airport arrival flow prediction10.1016/j.tre.2022.102997 ↗
6. Adequate is better: Particle swarm optimization with limited information
7. Integrating spoken instructions into flight trajectory prediction to optimize automation in air traffic control10.1038/s41467-024-54069-5 ↗
8. New results in optimizing surveillance system tracking and data correlation performance in dense multitarget environments10.1109/TAC.1973.1100421 ↗
9. A strategic flight conflict avoidance approach based on a memetic algorithm10.1016/j.cja.2013.12.002 ↗
10. Flight trajectory prediction enabled by time-frequency wavelet transform10.1038/s41467-023-40903-9 ↗
11. Hybrid System Modeling and Estimation for Arrival Time Prediction in Terminal Airspace10.2514/1.G001412 ↗
12. Adaptive Algorithm to Improve Trajectory Prediction Accuracy of Climbing Aircraft10.2514/1.58508 ↗
13. Tang, X., Zhou, L., Shen, Z., and Tang, M. (2015, January 25–27). 4D trajectory prediction of aircraft taxiing based on fitting velocity profile. Proceedings of the 2015 Cota International Conference Transportation Professionals, Beijing, China.10.1061/9780784479292.001 ↗
14. Daigle, M., Roychoudhury, I., Spirkovska, L., Goebel, K., Sankararaman, S., Ossenfort, J., and Kulkarni, C.S. (2017, January 5–9). Real-time prediction of safety margins in the national airspace. Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Denver, CO, USA.10.2514/6.2017-4388 ↗
15. Ghasemi Hamed, M., Gianazza, D., Serrurier, M., and Durand, N. (2013, January 10–13). Statistical prediction of aircraft trajectory: Regression methods vs. point-mass model. Proceedings of the ATM 2013, 10th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, Chicago, IL, USA.
16. FlightBERT: Binary Encoding Representation for Flight Trajectory Prediction
17. Chatterji, G. (1999, January 9–11). Short-term trajectory prediction methods. Proceedings of the Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Portland, OR, USA.10.2514/6.1999-4233 ↗
18. Mondoloni, S., and Liang, D. (2003, January 23–27). Improving trajectory forecasting through adaptive filtering technique. Proceedings of the 5th USA-Europe ATM Seminar, Budapest, Hungary.
19. Performance evaluation of particle filter resampling techniques for improved estimation of misalignment and trajectory deviation10.1007/s11045-017-0472-1 ↗
20. Hwang, I., Hwang, J., and Tomlin, C. (2003, January 11–14). Flight-mode-based aircraft conflict detection using a residual-mean interacting multiple model algorithm. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Austin, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2003-5340 ↗
21. Aircraft trajectory forecasting using local functional regression in sobolev space10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.013 ↗
22. Hybrid machine learning and estimation-based flight trajectory prediction in terminal airspace10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3126117 ↗
23. Learning aircraft operational factors to improve aircraft climb prediction: A large scale multi-airport study10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.012 ↗
24. Kun, W., and Wei, P. (2008, January 16–18). A 4-D trajectory prediction model based on radar data. Proceedings of the 27th Chinese Control Conference, Kunming, China.
25. Fuzzy Cluster Analysis of 4D Trajectory Based on ADS-B
26. A 4D trajectory prediction model based on the BP neural network
27. Bayesian neural networks for flight trajectory prediction and safety assessment10.1016/j.dss.2020.113246 ↗
28. Data-driven trajectory prediction with weather uncertainties: A Bayesian deep learning approach10.1016/j.trc.2021.103326 ↗
29. Shi, Z., Xu, M., Pan, Q., Yan, B., and Zhang, H. (2018, January 8–13). LSTM-based flight trajectory prediction. Proceedings of the 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489734 ↗
30. Zhang, Z., Yang, R., and Fang, Y. (2018, January 25–27). LSTM Network Based on Antlion Optimization and its Application in Flight Trajectory Prediction. Proceedings of the 2018 2nd IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China.10.1109/IMCEC.2018.8469476 ↗
31. A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for aircraft 4D trajectory prediction10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010963 ↗
32. 4D flight trajectory prediction using a hybrid deep learning prediction method based on ads-b technology: A case study of harts field—Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL)10.1016/j.trc.2022.103878 ↗
33. A combined online-learning model with K-means clustering and GRU neural networks for trajectory prediction10.1016/j.adhoc.2021.102476 ↗
34. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. arXiv.
35. Raissi, M. (2018). Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations. arXiv.10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.039 ↗
36. Nuic, A. (2010). User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Revision 3.10, Eurocontrol.
37. Performance evaluation of a novel 4D trajectory prediction model for civil aircraft10.1017/S0373463308004761 ↗
38. Lin, X., Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., and Liu, W. (2008, January 10–12). Simulation study of algorithms for aircraft trajectory prediction based on ads-b technology. Proceedings of the Asia Simulation Conference-7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing, Beijing, China.10.1109/ASC-ICSC.2008.4675378 ↗
39. Yan, H., Huang, G., Wang, H., and Shu, R. (2013, January 7–8). Application of unscented Kalman filter for flying target tracking. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information Science and Cloud Computing, Guangzhou, China.10.1109/ISCC.2013.10 ↗
40. Lymperopoulos, I., and Lygeros, J. (2008, January 18–21). Adaptive Aircraft Trajectory Prediction using Particle Filters. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.2514/6.2008-7387 ↗
41. Survey of maneuvering target tracking. part v. multiple-model methods10.1109/TAES.2005.1561886 ↗
42. Towards explainable traffic flow prediction with large language models10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100150 ↗
43. GPT-4 enhanced multimodal grounding for autonomous driving: Leveraging cross-modal attention with large language models10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100116 ↗
44. Leveraging reinforcement learning for dynamic traffic control: A survey and challenges for field implementation10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100104 ↗
45. A data-driven approach for dynamic and adaptive aircraft trajectory prediction10.1016/j.trpro.2021.11.002 ↗
46. Jeung, H., Shen, H.T., and Zhou, X. (2007). Mining trajectory patterns using hidden Markov models. International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-74553-2_44 ↗
47. A SVM Approach of Aircraft Conflict Detection in Free Flight10.1155/2018/7964641 ↗
48. Wiest, J., Hoffken, M., Kressel, U., and Dietmayer, K. (2012, January 3–7). Probabilistic trajectory prediction with gaussian mixture models. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IVS.2012.6232277 ↗
49. 4-D flight trajectory prediction with constrained LSTM network10.1109/TITS.2020.3004807 ↗
50. Bidirectional Q-learning for recycling path planning of used appliances under strong and weak constraints10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100153 ↗
51. Hashemi, S.M., Botez, R.M., and Grigorie, T.L. (2020). New Reliability Studies of Data-Driven Aircraft Trajectory Prediction. Aerospace, 7.10.3390/aerospace7100145 ↗
52. Neretin, E.S., Phuong, N.T.L., and Quan, N.N.H. (2022, January 14–15). An Analysis of Human Interaction and Weather Effects on Aircraft Trajectory Prediction via Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the 2022 XIX Technical Scientific Conference on Aviation Dedicated to the Memory of N.E. Zhukovsky (TSCZh), Moscow, Russia.10.1109/TSCZh55469.2022.9802458 ↗
53. Schafer, M., Strohmeier, M., Lenders, V., Martinovic, I., and Wilhelm, M. (2014, January 15–17). Bringing Up OpenSky: A Large-Scale ADS-B Sensor Network for Research. Proceedings of the 13th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/IPSN.2014.6846743 ↗
54. Skinn, D., and Tipps, D.O. (1996). Analysis of Boeing 737-400 aircraft operational data, FAA Report DOT/FAA/AR-95/21.
55. Dynamics of air combat
56. Raymer, D.P. (1992). Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [2nd ed.].
57. Meilinger, P.S. (2010). Bomber: The Formation and Early Years of Strategic Air Command, Air University Press.
58. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2015). U-2 Dragon Lady: Technical Specifications, Lockheed Martin Corporation.