Towards a Methodology for Spatially and Temporally Resolved Estimation of Emissions from Reservoirs: Learnings from Australia
Source abstract
Abstract
Methane emissions from freshwater reservoirs represent a globally relevant greenhouse gas source, which are estimated to range from 3% to 10% of all global anthropogenic methane emissions. However, there is high uncertainty in estimating reservoir emissions on local to global scales due to a combination of data paucity in key regions, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere, and challenges monitoring emission pathways. The key to improved spatially and temporally representative estimation of emission rates is to better understand the primary drivers of emission pathways, in particular, ebullition. We examine ebullition from 15 freshwater storages located in the Southern Hemisphere subtropical (South East Queensland) and temperate (Tasmania) regions using a combination of optical methane detection to develop the high-resolution mapping of ebullition zones and floating chamber incubation within ebullition zones to quantify areal emission rates. We demonstrate the equivalent water level, through air pressure or physical water level change, as a key driver of ebullition and examine the implications for spatially and temporally representative estimation of reservoir emissions. This study represents the largest broadscale ebullition survey undertaken across Australian temperate and subtropical reservoirs. The study findings are of broad relevance to scientists and corporate and government entities navigating the complexities of estimating greenhouse gas emissions from reservoirs and related policy instruments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
Hydro Tasmania, 4 Elizabeth Street, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
Seqwater, 117 Brisbane Street, Ipswich, QLD 4305, Australia
Funding
Hydro-Electric Corporation and Seqwater
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. (2025, April 16). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4, Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Available online: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/vol4.html.
2. Johnson, M.S., Matthews, E., Bastviken, D., Deemer, B., Du, J., and Genovese, V. (2021). Spatiotemporal methane emission from global reservoirs. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 126.10.1029/2021JG006305 ↗
3. Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoir water surfaces: A new global synthesis10.1093/biosci/biw117 ↗
4. Beaulieu, J.J., Waldo, S., Balz, D.A., Barnett, W., Hall, A., Platz, M.C., and White, K.M. (2020). Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from reservoirs: Controls and upscaling. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 125.10.1029/2019JG005474 ↗
5. Harrison, J.A., Prairie, Y.T., Mercier-Blais, S., and Soued, C. (2021). Year-2020 global distribution and pathways of reservoir methane and carbon dioxide emissions according to the greenhouse gas from reservoirs (G-res) model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 35.10.1029/2020GB006888 ↗
6. Sampling considerations and assessment of Exetainer usage for measuring dissolved and gaseous methane and nitrous oxide in aquatic systems10.1002/lom3.10031 ↗
7. Wave-induced release of methane: Littoral zones as source of methane in lakes10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.1990 ↗
8. Oxic water column methanogenesis as a major component of aquatic CH4 fluxes10.1038/ncomms6350 ↗
9. Soued, C., and Prairie, Y.T. (2022). Patterns and regulation of hypolimnetic CO2 and CH4 in a tropical reservoir using a process-based modeling approach. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 127.10.1029/2022JG006897 ↗
10. Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink10.1126/science.1196808 ↗
11. Sediment characteristics and methane ebullition in three subarctic lakes10.1029/2017JG004298 ↗
12. Cross continental increase in methane ebullition under climate change10.1038/s41467-017-01535-y ↗
13. Quantification of ebullitive and diffusive methane release to atmosphere from a water storage10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.011 ↗
14. Physical controls on methane ebullition from reservoirs and lakes10.2113/9.2.167 ↗
15. Effect of temperature and atmospheric pressure on methane (CH4) ebullition from near-surface peats10.1029/2006GL027509 ↗
16. Importance of sediment organic matter to methane ebullition in a sub-tropical freshwater reservoir10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.108 ↗
17. (2025, February 02). Surface Hydrology Polygons (National), Available online: https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/83135.
18. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management10.1890/100125 ↗
19. Quantifying spatiotemporal greenhouse gas emissions using autonomous surface vehicles10.1002/rob.21665 ↗
20. Varadharajan, C., and Hemond, H.F. (2012). Time-series analysis of high-resolution ebullition fluxes from a stratified, freshwater lake. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 117.10.1029/2011JG001866 ↗
21. (2025, March 15). Water Data Online, Available online: www.bom.gov.au/waterdata/.
22. (2025, March 15). Climate Data Online, Available online: www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/.
23. Influence of water table level and soil properties on emissions of greenhouse gases from cultivated peat soil10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.002 ↗
24. The importance of small artificial water bodies as sources of methane emissions in Queensland, Australia10.5194/hess-22-5281-2018 ↗
25. (2025, April 20). Dell Inc. Available online: http://www.statsoft.com/Products/STATISTICA-Features.
26. Estimates of reservoir methane emissions based on a spatially balanced probabilistic-survey10.1002/lno.10284 ↗
27. Spatial variability of methane (CH4) ebullition in a tropical hypereutrophic reservoir: Silted areas as a bubble hot spot10.1080/10402381.2017.1390018 ↗
28. Temporal variability in reservoir surface area is an important source of uncertainty in GHG emission estimates10.1029/2024WR037726 ↗
29. Shi, W., Chen, Q., Zhang, J., Lu, J., Chen, Y., Pang, B., Yu, J., and Van Dam, B.R. (2021). Spatial patterns of diffusive methane emissions across sediment deposited riparian zones in hydropower reservoirs. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 126.10.1029/2020JG005945 ↗
30. Bastviken, D., Cole, J., Pace, M., and Tranvik, L. (2004). Methane emissions from lakes: Dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 18.10.1029/2004GB002238 ↗
31. Productivity and depth regulate lake contributions to atmospheric methane10.1002/lno.10247 ↗
32. Methane emission by bubbling from Gatun Lake, Panama10.1029/92JD02170 ↗
33. Wik, M., Crill, P.M., Bastviken, D., Danielsson, Å., and Norbäck, E. (2011). Bubbles trapped in arctic lake ice: Potential implications for methane emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeoscie., 116.10.1029/2011JG001761 ↗
34. Pumping methane out of aquatic sediments–ebullition forcing mechanisms in an impounded river10.5194/bg-11-2925-2014 ↗
35. Air pressure and methane fluxes10.1038/347718b0 ↗
36. Multiyear measurements of ebullitive methane flux from three subarctic lakes10.1002/jgrg.20103 ↗
37. Half of global methane emissions come from highly variable aquatic ecosystem sources10.1038/s41561-021-00715-2 ↗
38. International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) (2023). IFRS S2 climate-related Disclosures, IFRS Foundation. Available online: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/.