Social Trusty Algorithm: A New Algorithm for Computing the Trust Score Between All Entities in Social Networks Based on Linear Algebra
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing importance of social networks has led to increased research into trust estimation and interpretation among network entities. It is important to predict the trust score between users in order to minimize the risks in user interactions. This article enables the identification of the most reliable and least reliable entities in a network by expressing trust scores numerically. In this paper, the social network is modeled as a graph, and trust scores are calculated by taking the powers of the ratio matrix between entities and summing them. Taking the power of the proportion matrix based on the number of entities in the network requires a lot of arithmetic load. After taking the powers of the eigenvalues of the ratio matrix, these are multiplied by the eigenvector matrix to obtain the power of the ratio matrix. In this way, the arithmetic cost required for calculating trust between entities is reduced. This paper calculates the trust score between entities using linear algebra techniques to reduce the arithmetic load. Trust detection algorithms use shortest paths and similar methods to eliminate paths that are deemed unimportant, which makes the result questionable because of the loss of data. The novelty of this method is that it calculates the trust score without the need for explicit path numbering and without any data loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Computer Technologies Department, Vocational School of Arapgir, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya 44800, Turkey
Software Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, İnönü University, Malatya 44100, Turkey
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. MECIM: Multi-entity evolutionary competitive influence maximization in social networks10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126436 ↗
2. Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks10.1145/1594173.1594174 ↗
3. Exploring security and trust mechanisms in online social networks: An extensive review10.1016/j.cose.2024.103790 ↗
4. An integrative model of organizational trust10.2307/258792 ↗
5. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model10.2307/30036519 ↗
6. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235 ↗
7. A group trust metric for identifying people of trust in online social networks10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.084 ↗
8. Measuring trust in social networks based on linear uncertainty theory10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.055 ↗
9. Minimizing the expected complete influence time of a social network10.1016/j.ins.2010.03.012 ↗
10. A Large-Scale Group Decision Making Model Based on Trust Relationship and Social Network Updating
11. A novel consensus model considering individual and social behaviors under the social trust network10.1016/j.ins.2024.120587 ↗
12. A novel collective matrix factorization model for recommendation with fine-grained social trust prediction10.1002/cpe.4233 ↗
13. A cost-effective algorithm for inferring the trust between two individuals in social networks10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.027 ↗
14. Golbeck, J.A. (2005). Computing and Applying Trust in Web-Based Social Networks. [Ph.D. Thesis., University of Maryland].
15. Taherian, M., Amini, M., and Jalili, R. (2008, January 8–13). Trust inference in web-based social networks using resistive networks. Proceedings of the 2008 Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ICIW.2008.41 ↗
16. Liu, G., Wang, Y., and Orgun, M. (2009, January 29–31). Trust inference in complex trust-oriented social networks. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CSE.2009.248 ↗
17. Personalized recommendation via trust-based diffusion10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928574 ↗
18. A topic-sensitive trust evaluation approach for users in online communities10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105546 ↗
19. A knowledge coverage-based trust propagation for recommendation mechanism in social network group decision making10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107005 ↗
20. Trust-aware recommendation based on heterogeneous multi-relational graphs fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.001 ↗
21. A deep learning based trust-and tag-aware recommender system10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.064 ↗
22. Trust-aware location recommendation in location-based social networks: A graph-based approach10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119048 ↗
23. KTPGN: Novel event-based group recommendation method considering implicit social trust and knowledge propagation10.1016/j.ins.2023.119159 ↗
24. The trust incentive mechanism by trust propagation to optimize consensus in social network group decision making10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125111 ↗
25. A bilateral negotiation mechanism by dynamic harmony threshold for group consensus decision making10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108225 ↗
26. Decayed trust propagation method in multiple overlapping communities for improving consensus under social network group decision making10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3398591 ↗
27. An incentive mechanism-based minimum adjustment consensus model under dynamic trust relationship10.1109/TCYB.2023.3349257 ↗
28. A novel trust prediction approach for online social networks based on multifaceted feature similarity10.1007/s10586-022-03617-z ↗
29. Trust levels in social networks10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19850 ↗
30. Huang, M., Jiang, Q., Qu, Q., and Rasool, A. (2021). An overlapping community detection approach in ego-splitting networks using symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization. Symmetry, 13.10.3390/sym13050869 ↗
31. Boosting Viewer Experience with Emotion-Driven Video Analysis: A BERT-based Framework for Social Media Content10.62762/JAIB.2025.954751 ↗
32. Bondy, J.A., and Murty, U.S.R. (2008). Graph Theory, Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.10.1007/978-1-84628-970-5 ↗
33. Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.003.0001 ↗
34. Graph anomaly detection with graph neural networks: Current status and challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3211306 ↗
35. Larson, R., Edwards, B.H., and Falvo, D.C. (2013). Elementary Linear Algebra, John Wiley & Sons.
36. Singh, S.I., and Sinha, S.K. (2010). A new trust model based on time series prediction and Markov model. Information and Communication Technologies: International Conference, ICT 2010, Kochi, Kerala, India, September 7–9, 2010, Proceedings, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-15766-0_22 ↗
37. Norris, J.R. (1998). Markov Chains, Cambridge University Press. No. 2.10.1017/CBO9780511810633 ↗
38. Kunegis, J. (2013, January 13–17). Konect: The Koblenz Network Collection. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available online: http://konect.cc/networks/.10.1145/2487788.2488173 ↗
39. Johnson, D.S., and Trick, M.A. (1996). Cliques, Coloring, and Satisfiability: Second DIMACS Implementation Challenge, 11–13 October 1993, American Mathematical Society. Available online: https://cedric.cnam.fr/~porumbed/graphs/.10.1090/dimacs/026 ↗