journal article·2025-09-01Open access

Seismic Fragility of Large-Span Elevated U-Shaped Aqueduct Based on Incremental Dynamic Analysis

Jing Wei, Xinjun Yan

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

This study uses a U-shaped aqueduct structure in a specific irrigation area as the research object to examine the damage patterns of large-span elevated U-shaped aqueduct structures under seismic action. A single-span aqueduct model that integrates fluid–structure interaction is created with the finite element program ANSYS. The incremental dynamic analysis approach is utilized to perform nonlinear dynamic time–history assessments for three types of bearings—plate rubber bearings, pot rubber bearings and lead-core rubber bearings—under conditions of an empty condition, a half-full condition and a design water level. Seismic fragility curves for the bearings and piers subjected to transverse seismic stress are developed using capacity–demand ratio models and specified damage limit states. The findings demonstrate that the likelihood of aqueduct components being damaged increases substantially as seismic intensity increases, with bearings failing before piers. Under the conditions of empty, half-full and design water levels, the structural mass increases as a result of higher water levels. This alters the dynamic response characteristics and increases the likelihood of failure in a variety of damage states. The probability of plate rubber bearings experiencing minor damage exceedance increases from 11.75% to 61.6% as the water level rises from vacant to design conditions. Lead-core rubber bearings provide better seismic isolation than plate rubber bearings and pot rubber bearings. This greatly lowers the aqueduct structure’s displacement response and damage likelihood. Under design water level circumstances, the chance of mild damage to lead rubber bearings is 8.64%, at a peak ground acceleration of 0.4 g. The damage probabilities for the pot rubber bearings and the plate rubber bearings are 80.68% and 97.45%, respectively. The research findings establish a theoretical foundation for the seismic design and damage evaluation of aqueduct structures in places with high seismic activity, ensuring the stable operation of water transfer projects and sustainable water resource utilization, presenting considerable technical applicability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Dam Engineering and Safety · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Security and Water Disasters Prevention, Urumqi 830052, China

Funding

Key Research and Development Special Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Inter-basin water transfers and water rebound effects: The South-North water transfer Project in China10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131516 ↗
2. A numerical and theoretical analysis of the structural performance for a new type of steel-concrete composite aqueduct10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112839 ↗
3. Roebling’s 1845 Allegheny Aqueduct: Design, History and Performance10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6458 ↗
4. Collision in the expansion joint effects on the seismic behavior of large-scale aqueduct10.1080/13467581.2020.1800478 ↗
5. Experimental Study on Dynamic Interaction between Large U-Shape Aqueduct and Water10.1007/s12205-021-0232-5 ↗
6. Finite element analysis of the aseismicity of a large aqueduct10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.018 ↗
7. Analysis of the importance coefficient of offshore bridges under earthquakes based on seismic fragility and incremental dynamic analysis10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107987 ↗
8. Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.001 ↗
9. Overall seismic reliability analysis of aqueduct structure based on different levels under random earthquake10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105469 ↗
10. Xu, X.Y., Liu, X.H., Jiang, L., and Khan, M.Y.A. (2021). Dynamic Damage Mechanism and Seismic Fragility Analysis of an Aqueduct Structure. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411709 ↗
11. Seismic fragility of arch dams based on damage analysis10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.018 ↗
12. Regional seismic fragility of bridge network derived by covariance matrix model of bridge portfolios10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118035 ↗
13. Seismic fragility analysis of concrete dams: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.034 ↗
14. Nonlinear random seismic response analysis of the double-trough aqueduct based on fiber beam element model10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106856 ↗
15. Seismic reliability analysis of random parameter aqueduct structure under random earthquake10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107083 ↗
16. Seismic fragility assessment of aqueduct bent structures subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116505 ↗
17. Fragility analysis of high-span aqueduct structure under near-fault and far-field ground motions10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.096 ↗
18. Analysis of Seismic Fragility of Aqueduct Structure Based on Copula Function10.1088/1755-1315/304/4/042061 ↗
19. Ma, Y., Wu, Z.B., Liu, Z.S., Zhang, M.Q., and Aibaidula, M. (2022). Seismic Fragility Analysis of Aqueduct Structural Systems Based on G-PCM Method. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142013161 ↗
20. Xiong, Z.H., Liu, C., Zhang, A.J., Zhu, H.D., and Li, J.W. (2021). Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Simply Supported Aqueduct Accounting for Water Stop’s Leakage Risk. Water, 13.10.3390/w13101404 ↗
21. Optimal intensity measures and probabilistic fragility assessment for the long-span aqueduct structure with four-column bents10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139100 ↗
22. Nonlinear Response and Collapse Analysis of Double-Channel Aqueduct under Strong Earthquake
23. (2018). Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures (Standard No. GB 51247-2018).
24. (2008). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (Standard No. ATC-63).
25. De Macêdo Wahrhaftig, A., Eisenberger, M., Baptista Elias, C., and Malheiros Filho, L.A. (2025). Seismic Response of Variable Section Column with a Change in Its Boundary Conditions. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15091456 ↗
26. Seismic Fragility Analysis of Bridge Group Pile Foundations considering Fluid-Pile-Soil Interaction
27. Seismic vulnerability assessment of laminated rubber bearing supported highway bridges with various bearing bonding alternatives10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119498 ↗
28. (2020). Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Specifications for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges (Standard No. JTG/T2231-01-2020).
29. Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.017 ↗
30. Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of aqueduct structures considering different sources of uncertainty10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107750 ↗
31. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00058-9 ↗
32. (2010). Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (Standard No. GB 50011-2010).
33. Seismic fragility of continuous steel highway bridges in New York state10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(689) ↗
34. Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526) ↗
35. Shome, N., and Cornell, C.A. (1999). Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures, Stanford University.
36. Blast resistance performance and failure modes of prestressed thin-walled aqueducts subjected to underwater contact explosion10.1016/j.tws.2024.111993 ↗
37. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1999). Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology. Earthquake Model, Federal Emergency Management Agency. HAZUS99 User’s Manual.
38. Dutta, A., and Mander, J. (2001). Rapid and Detailed Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
39. Multi-angle, multi-damage fragility curves for seismic assessment of bridges10.1002/eqe.2584 ↗
40. Hwang, H., Liu, J.B., and Chiu, Y.H. (2025, August 04). Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges. Mid-America Earthquake Center CD Release 01-06. Available online: https://mae.cee.illinois.edu/publications/reports/Report01-06.pdf.
41. Time-Varying Seismic Fragility Analysis of Offshore Bridges with Continuous Rigid-Frame Girder under Main Aftershock Sequences10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001578 ↗
42. Buckle, I.G., Friedland, I., Mander, J., Martin, G., Nutt, R., and Power, M. (2006). Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures. Part 1, Bridges, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
43. Assessment of plastic hinge length in reinforced concrete columns10.1080/15732479.2023.2263432 ↗
44. Seismic performance upgrade of highway bridges using a novel hybrid placement of bonded and unbonded laminated rubber bearings10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106805 ↗
45. Research on the Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Laminated Rubber Bearing
46. Seismic response of sliding structures to bidirectional earthquake excitation10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199611)25:11<1301::AID-EQE618>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗