journal article·2025-08-29Open access

An Optimization Placement Method of Sensors for Water Film Thickness Estimation of the Entire Airport Runway

Juewei Cai, Rongxin Zhao, Wei Ouyang, Dehuai Yang, Mengyuan Zeng

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

This study presents an optimized methodology for the placement of water film thickness sensors, integrating information theory with experimental validation. Initially, the two-dimensional shallow-water equations are employed to simulate the spatiotemporal evolution of water film thickness across the entire runway, providing a comprehensive foundational dataset. By applying information entropy theory, the total information content at each runway grid point is quantified. Analysis indicates that grid points with higher total information content generally correspond to regions of greater water film thickness. The optimal placement for a single sensor is determined by identifying the location that maximizes total information content, and its effectiveness is validated through controlled rain–fog experiments. The results demonstrate that positioning a single sensor at a site with higher water film thickness reduces the overall mean estimation error by 57%, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy. By extending the single-sensor placement framework, the total information content across all runway points is recalculated, and additional rain–fog experiments are conducted to verify the optimal locations. By incorporating a correlation coefficient–distance (C–D) model to define each sensor’s influence radius, a collaborative multi-sensor placement strategy is developed and implemented at Seletar Airport, Singapore. The findings show that sensor locations with higher water film thickness correspond to increased total information content, and that expanding the number of deployed sensors further improves estimation accuracy. Compared with conventional placement approaches, which rely on subjective judgment and long-term operational experience, the proposed method enhances estimation accuracy by over 23% when deploying two sensors. These results provide a robust basis for the strategic placement of runway water film thickness sensors and contribute to more precise assessments of pavement surface conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Air Traffic Management and Optimization · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Engineering Structure Safety No. 75, Wanping South Road, Shanghai 201108, China

College of Transportation, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China

PowerChina Road & Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100048, China

Funding

Shanghai Pujiang Programme · Shanghai Urban Digital Transformation Special Fund Project · Shanghai 2023 Annual “Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan” Social Development Science and Technology Challenge Project · Shanghai Rising-Star Program

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. International Civil Aviation Organization (2023). 2023 Safety Report, ICAO.
2. A Review of General Aviation Safety (1984–2017)10.3357/AMHP.4862.2017 ↗
3. Running out of Runway: Analysis of 35 Years of Landing Overrun Accidents
4. Tire-Pavement Friction Modeling Considering Pavement Texture and Water Film10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.04.001 ↗
5. Incorporating Pavement Skid Resistance and Hydroplaning Risk Considerations in Asphalt Mix Design10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000872 ↗
6. Estimation Method for Area Distribution of Water Film Thickness on Airport Runway Modified by Measured Data in Real Time
7. Parameters Influencing Measurement and Modeling of Skid Resistance of Asphalt Pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.002 ↗
8. Civil Aviation Administration of China (2010). China Civil Airport Airfield Maintenance Technical Guide (AC-140-CA-2010-3), CAAC.
9. Assessment of operational characteristics of continuous friction measuring equipment (CFME)10.1080/10298436.2012.667097 ↗
10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2020). Guide for Pavement Friction, AASHTO.
11. Modelling of Aircraft Braking Coefficient from IMAG Friction Measurements
12. Federal Aviation Administration (2016). Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM), FAA.
13. International Civil Aviation Organization (2021). Global Reporting Format (GRF) for Runway Surface Conditions, ICAO.
14. Civil Aviation Administration of China (2021). Notification on the Issuance of Rules for the Assessment and Reporting of Runway Surface Conditions at Transport Airports, CAAC.
15. Sun, L. (2009). Research on IRS21 Intelligent Pavement Condition Sensor. [Master’s Thesis, Southeast University].
16. Remote Sensing of Weather and Road Surface Conditions: Is Technology Mature for Reliable Intelligent Transportation Systems Applications?10.3141/2329-02 ↗
17. Application of infrared thermography for debonding detection in asphalt pavements10.1007/s13349-019-00337-8 ↗
18. Implementation of Polymer Optical Fibre Sensor System for Monitoring Water Membrane Thickness on Pavement Surface10.1080/10298436.2019.1652298 ↗
19. Wosniok, A. (2019). POF Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring. Plastic Optical Fiber Sensors, CRC Press.10.1201/b22357-12 ↗
20. Fiber Bragg grating sensors for monitoring of physical parameters: A comprehensive review10.1117/1.OE.59.6.060901 ↗
21. Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model for Surface-Flow Routing10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000913 ↗
22. Modelling and Simulation of Pavement Drainage10.1080/10298436.2017.1347437 ↗
23. On a Class of High Resolution Total-Variation-Stable Finite-Difference Schemes10.1137/0721001 ↗
24. A new method for automated monitoring of road pavement aging conditions based on recurrent neural network10.1109/TITS.2022.3204334 ↗
25. Wide-Area Dynamic Sensing Method of Water Film Thickness on Asphalt Runway10.1520/JTE20190172 ↗
26. Yang, W., Tian, B., Fang, Y., Wu, D., Zhou, L., and Cai, J. (2022). Evaluation of Highway Hydroplaning Risk Based on 3D Laser Scanning and Water-Film Thickness Estimation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19137699 ↗
27. Estimation of surface run-off for urban area using integrated remote sensing and GIS approach10.14525/jjce.8.1.2630 ↗
28. Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics10.1103/PhysRev.106.620 ↗
29. Vargas, E. (2022). Shallow-Water Sensor Placement, Naval Postgraduate School.
30. A comparative study of mutual information-based input variable selection strategies for the displacement prediction of seepage-driven landslides using optimized support vector regression10.1007/s00477-022-02183-5 ↗
31. Measuring and Testing Dependence by Correlation of Distances
32. Optimal sensor placement for the routine monitoring of urban drainage systems: A re-clustering method10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117579 ↗
33. Barrett, M.L., and Pigman, J.G. (2025, August 19). Evaluation of Automated Bridge Deck Anti-Icing System, Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/15875.
34. Chang, N.B., and Guo, D.H. (2006, January 23–25). Urban flash flood monitoring, mapping and forecasting via a tailored sensor network system. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA.